Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justices pay tribute to Rehnquist (all except Souter, who refuses to issue statement)
CNN ^ | September 4, 2005 | CNN

Posted on 09/04/2005 8:15:18 PM PDT by SpringheelJack

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-173 next last
To: SpringheelJack

Souter has been mad since Justice Rehnquist kicked his rear in the 1998 All Court Greco Roman Wrestling Match.


41 posted on 09/04/2005 8:39:52 PM PDT by HoustonCurmudgeon (I'm a Conservative but will not support evil just because it's "the law.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chrispycsuf
if you guys are sinking that low, maybe this isnt the type of conservatives i want to be around

My heart is broken.

42 posted on 09/04/2005 8:40:01 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: JLS
I suspect maybe Justice Renquist often expressed his disapproval of Souter lying his way on the court. Or maybe Renquist froze Souter out of decisions he wished to write because of his lying his way onto the court.

Very insightful theory! It has already been established that Souter is a liar and the enemy of conservatives. I am hoping that W has learned the hard lessons of his father's mistakes. Conservatives are already roasting him over his non-existant immigration 'policy'. Time for W to grow some balls and reward his conservative supporters by creating a conservative Supreme Court.

43 posted on 09/04/2005 8:43:17 PM PDT by demkicker ((Life has many choices. Eternity has only two. Which one have you chosen?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: chrispycsuf
"if you guys are sinking that low, maybe this isnt the type of conservatives i want to be around.."

This is a conservative forum where people are allowed to speak their minds. If it is too much for you to handle then perhaps you are right--maybe you should not be here. Nice having you here briefly and hope you find another forum that suits your taste.
44 posted on 09/04/2005 8:44:41 PM PDT by dmw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: chrispycsuf
If Souter is gay, that puts him in a small minority. Granting that scenario, he then becomes a person that makes decisions affecting the large majority. Telling us that it is none of the majority's business as to his sexual orientation is rather disingenuous.
45 posted on 09/04/2005 8:44:56 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth

Is the pope catholic ?


46 posted on 09/04/2005 8:45:15 PM PDT by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
I truly believe somebody has some serious dirt on this scumbag Souter.

There were good reasons why certain behavioral tendencies were once shunned for being intrinsically extortable. Avoiding these traits in potential judicial nominees is still good public policy.

47 posted on 09/04/2005 8:47:01 PM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SpringheelJack

Souter vs Rehnquist...........I think it all stems from a property rights joke that Rehnquist related to Souter.........ha


48 posted on 09/04/2005 8:47:13 PM PDT by AwesomePossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Souter plays for the other team in more ways than one.


49 posted on 09/04/2005 8:47:31 PM PDT by adam_az (It's the border, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SpringheelJack

He must have consulted with Dershiwitch. (misspell intended)


50 posted on 09/04/2005 8:47:39 PM PDT by Ursus arctos horribilis ("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #51 Removed by Moderator

To: adam_az


LOL!


52 posted on 09/04/2005 8:48:25 PM PDT by onyx (North is a direction. South is a way of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth
Here is the problem. The big gay organizations have been threatening to out Souter for several years and it is more than obvious that if he IS gay he did not want to be outed. That is the problem since that is where pressure can be brought to bear. I have no problem if he is gay BUT I do have a problem with the prospect of him making decisions under the threat of being outed.
53 posted on 09/04/2005 8:48:44 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: cynicom

but that same arguement can be then be used by the left into their probe into the adoption of Robert's children....i just dont see the need to probe a persons life...we now know he is liberal...that enough is resoning why he is brain-dead when it comes to making logical decisions


54 posted on 09/04/2005 8:49:41 PM PDT by chrispycsuf (our troops need our support now more than ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: chrispycsuf

LOL, you haven't been here long have you? It was just a question. This forum has all kinds and if you get offended easily you are better off somewhere else.


55 posted on 09/04/2005 8:49:50 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SpringheelJack

Did you see what Ginsburg said?

I need to drop some heavy objects to see if gravity is still functioning!


56 posted on 09/04/2005 8:52:22 PM PDT by Grizzled Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chrispycsuf

No, it is not sufficient reason.

He did not present himself as a liberal during his confirmation hearings. In other words, he lied.


57 posted on 09/04/2005 8:53:25 PM PDT by onyx (North is a direction. South is a way of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: onyx

dont all liberals


58 posted on 09/04/2005 8:53:43 PM PDT by chrispycsuf (our troops need our support now more than ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: onyx

but i do see your point now...the question of his sexuality just seemed to come out of nowhere...so im just going to shut up now...


59 posted on 09/04/2005 8:55:13 PM PDT by chrispycsuf (our troops need our support now more than ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: chrispycsuf
Roberts??? Indeed, I hope the dems do a through grilling and background check on Roberts. That is their job.

When anyone seeks one of the highest posts in our government, they have to understand that they no longer have immunity from scrutiny.

The last Justice Roberts was appointed as a conservative republican and he turned out to be the best accomplice FDR had in government. So much for labels.

60 posted on 09/04/2005 8:55:31 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-173 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson