Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. agency blocks photos of New Orleans dead
Reuters | September 7, 2005

Posted on 09/06/2005 10:29:23 PM PDT by HAL9000

NEW ORLEANS, Sept 6 (Reuters) - The U.S. government agency leading the rescue efforts after Hurricane Katrina said on Tuesday it does not want the news media to take photographs of the dead as they are recovered from the flooded New Orleans area.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency, heavily criticized for its slow response to the devastation caused by the hurricane, rejected requests from journalists to accompany rescue boats as they went out to search for storm victims.

An agency spokeswoman said space was needed on the rescue boats and that "the recovery of the victims is being treated with dignity and the utmost respect."

"We have requested that no photographs of the deceased be made by the media," the spokeswoman said in an e-mailed response to a Reuters inquiry.

The Bush administration also has prevented the news media from photographing flag-draped caskets of U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq, which has sparked criticism that the government is trying to block images that put the war in a bad light.

The White House is under fire for its handling of the relief effort, which many officials have charged was slow and bureacratic, contributing to the death and mayhem in New Orleans after the storm struck on Aug. 29.



TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alreuters; fema; hurricane; hurricanekatrina; katrina; neworleans; photojournalism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
To: HAL9000
I found reading of the Galveston 1900 hurricane interesting. The militia and police officers placed looters against the nearest wall or pile of debris and unceremoniously shot them out of hand without benefit of trial or proceeding.

But what was really interesting was they did the same to "Kodiak fiends" caught taking photos of the nude dead. I took the term Kodiak fiend to mean MSM of the era. Would prove to be a worthy idea to resurrect same treatment for present day MSM.
41 posted on 09/06/2005 11:06:37 PM PDT by Ursus arctos horribilis ("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
I think you are mistaken. The military casket photos were never on DefenseLink.mil until after the forced release of them via the FOIA from "TheMemoryHole.org".

When was the FOIA? I remember downloading them from the Afghanistan conflict before we ever went into Iraq.

42 posted on 09/06/2005 11:07:08 PM PDT by killjoy (Real Men Love Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: killjoy
Since when is the government in charge of what the media prints or does not print? Stupidity like this is what is giving this administration a bad name.

Nowhere does it say the government is ordering the media to stop taking pictures of the dead. That's because they can't, both legally and practically. My guess is that you know this, too, so try reading the article a little more thoroughly next time. The quote says the government "requests" they not take the photos.

Now, tell me again about stupidity and bad names.

43 posted on 09/06/2005 11:07:18 PM PDT by GoBucks2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

ogrish has some pics, as well as tsunami pics.

The bloated semi-human faces you'll see are not anything you want to see. I can take it, but very few can.


44 posted on 09/06/2005 11:08:10 PM PDT by Lauretij2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
These guys understand about as much about the United States as they do Poland.

The BBC TV news last night said the new troops in New Orleans were from Fort Bragg, Texas.

45 posted on 09/06/2005 11:08:28 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice

There is an excellent article on Opinion Journal, tonight, that does just that, criticizes Blanco and Nagin.


46 posted on 09/06/2005 11:10:08 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: djf

We actually should see pics of the dead. And the 9/11 splattered bodies.

We're adults, we need to not be so damn desensitized by the media. ogrish usually provides as much as they can, but it's pretty rare to get major disaster-area footage.


47 posted on 09/06/2005 11:10:26 PM PDT by Lauretij2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: killjoy
Gee, and you wouldn't recognize the clothes they were wearing? Don't give me that. The Iraqis were able to identify the remains of their loved ones buried for years by they were wearing when they were taken away. Even with the deterioration and only bones inside of them.

When you love someone, there is always something about what remains that you will recognize.

48 posted on 09/06/2005 11:12:06 PM PDT by McGavin999 (Global Dumbing far more serious threat than Global Warming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: GoBucks2002
Nowhere does it say the government is ordering the media to stop taking pictures of the dead. That's because they can't, both legally and practically.

So why are they even making a statement about it?

49 posted on 09/06/2005 11:12:45 PM PDT by killjoy (Real Men Love Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

It's as likely to identify flood drowning victims as it is to identify the cow of the steak you ate.

Basically, it's totally turned into something that's outreagously horrible, but unrecognizable.


50 posted on 09/06/2005 11:14:26 PM PDT by Lauretij2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici; All
No, maybe they were too busy publishing photos of dead Asian tsunami victims.

Sorry guys, but with all due respect, I call this a very bad move on the part of the US Government - and for two main reasons really.

Number 1 - How do you stop someone from taking photos? Many have already been taken - what kind of restrictive action will be taken against anyone who publishes them?

Number 2 - I live and work in on of the countries affected by the earthquake and tsunamis and am very concerned how this can be manipulated and how it will play out in the local media here.

Where is the similar "respect" for the victims of the tsunami and how many of you saw the photos of the dead strewn along the beaches in Thailand?

51 posted on 09/06/2005 11:14:55 PM PDT by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
When you love someone, there is always something about what remains that you will recognize.

In Thailand, jewelry was used in a lot of cases to ID the bodies. My point is unless they are printing detailed close-ups of identifying features in the news, they are not going to be identified this way.

52 posted on 09/06/2005 11:16:09 PM PDT by killjoy (Real Men Love Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: expatguy

Think of all the 9/11 stuff we never got to see.

A lot of it simply makes it easier to forget and sanitize. People need to see atrocities. ALL the details.

A natural disaster's a little more refined, but I still say show all of it.

Why not show it all? The government shouldn't say what's ok and what's not.


53 posted on 09/06/2005 11:17:23 PM PDT by Lauretij2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: The Noodle
I'm of the opinion that the figure will shock many of you here.

I think 40,000 dead from this tragedy is a conservative figure.

54 posted on 09/06/2005 11:19:08 PM PDT by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: killjoy
He posted them in April of 2004 according to this NYT story.
55 posted on 09/06/2005 11:19:24 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: dc-zoo
The CNN war bitch never misses a chance to show the dead victims, all the while blabbing on about how Bush was being criticized for the disaster.

Attempting a linkage, nah, not her.

Greta was strutting her stuff tonight looking like a deer in the headlights. She was wearing a NOPD jacket, said some LEO had bestowed it to protect her against the evening chill. Likely got PO'ed when he didn't give her a sidearm to complete the outfit.

56 posted on 09/06/2005 11:20:24 PM PDT by Ursus arctos horribilis ("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: killjoy
So why are they even making a statement about it?

My guess is that it's because they would prefer pics not be taken.

How have you managed to get this far in life without the ability to see the difference between a request and a command?

57 posted on 09/06/2005 11:20:50 PM PDT by GoBucks2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: expatguy

Privately, I would not want photos of my loved ones splashed in bloated splendar across the pages of the Washington Post or the internet.

Publicly, the more the merrier. Show the bodies falling out the towers. Show the bodies floating down Canal street, the cops looting Wal-Mart and the dead elderly folks in their wheelchairs.

And those photos will keep being published until the MSM is convinced that the locals truly are to blame for this f***-up. Then the photos will stop.


58 posted on 09/06/2005 11:20:57 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (When a Jihadist dies, an angel gets its wings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"You mean unless they see an actual picture, they may not miss their loved one? "

Actually, no. I am not for the media publication of the pics at all. But I do wonder about a general discouragement of any truthful deathtolls. As I remember, MS seemed to sit on 59 or so for a few days, after it became totally apparent that it must be much higher, maybe magnitudes higher. Nagin recently confirmed that 10, 000 won't really surprise him, and my wife heard 09/06 that 80,000 body bags had been ordered, didn't hear who. I'm gonna go google bodybags.

59 posted on 09/06/2005 11:21:41 PM PDT by de Buillion (Perspective: 1880 dead Heroes in 3 yr vs. 3589 abortions EVERY DAY , 1999, USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: konaice
When the finally tally is in we will have lost more people to a Sobbing Governor and a corrupt and incompetent Mayor that we lost on 9/11, Afghanistan, Gulf I, Gulf II and the occupation of Iraq combined.

That is a truly sobering remark and bears repeating. I hope that the numbers are not going to go that high but I think everyone knows or senses that they will. God rest their souls.
60 posted on 09/06/2005 11:22:41 PM PDT by hummingbird (21st Century Newsreporting - "Don't get me started!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson