Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. agency blocks photos of New Orleans dead
Reuters | September 7, 2005

Posted on 09/06/2005 10:29:23 PM PDT by HAL9000

NEW ORLEANS, Sept 6 (Reuters) - The U.S. government agency leading the rescue efforts after Hurricane Katrina said on Tuesday it does not want the news media to take photographs of the dead as they are recovered from the flooded New Orleans area.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency, heavily criticized for its slow response to the devastation caused by the hurricane, rejected requests from journalists to accompany rescue boats as they went out to search for storm victims.

An agency spokeswoman said space was needed on the rescue boats and that "the recovery of the victims is being treated with dignity and the utmost respect."

"We have requested that no photographs of the deceased be made by the media," the spokeswoman said in an e-mailed response to a Reuters inquiry.

The Bush administration also has prevented the news media from photographing flag-draped caskets of U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq, which has sparked criticism that the government is trying to block images that put the war in a bad light.

The White House is under fire for its handling of the relief effort, which many officials have charged was slow and bureacratic, contributing to the death and mayhem in New Orleans after the storm struck on Aug. 29.



TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alreuters; fema; hurricane; hurricanekatrina; katrina; neworleans; photojournalism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
To: killjoy

It is called common decency and respect for the dead. Sorry, NA, forgot is was the MSM under discussion.


61 posted on 09/06/2005 11:24:12 PM PDT by Ursus arctos horribilis ("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: injin
Agree. Would they want to see their loved ones' remains displayed so capriciously - just to sell their photos...?!
62 posted on 09/06/2005 11:26:24 PM PDT by hummingbird (21st Century Newsreporting - "Don't get me started!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
He posted them in April of 2004 according to this NYT story.

They were posted online long before that. It might not have been on defenselink, but it was on one of the public military sites. I have about 10 DVDs filled with US military photos from .mil sites. I used to have an automated process that went out and grabbed anything new. I can get you more exact dates, based on file timestamps, if you want but it will take a little bit of time to find them.

63 posted on 09/06/2005 11:26:57 PM PDT by killjoy (Real Men Love Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Joe Cannon
What a wonderful way for the family to find out that their loved one is dead. Media scum.

The crappiest most tasteless picture I've ever seen in my local paper was of my cousin's bloated corpse, butt crack showing above his blue jeans, and the water line on the front page.

I don't know what the hell they were thinking publishing something like that.

64 posted on 09/06/2005 11:33:29 PM PDT by sockmonkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lauretij2
Basically, it's totally turned into something that's outreagously horrible, but unrecognizable.

Kinda' makes me wonder why they want to take the pictures in the first place if that's the case.
65 posted on 09/06/2005 11:35:18 PM PDT by hummingbird (21st Century Newsreporting - "Don't get me started!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Eva
There is an excellent article on Opinion Journal, tonight, that does just that, criticizes Blanco and Nagin.

Ehhhhhxcellent. Off to go read and bookmark... Thanks!

66 posted on 09/06/2005 11:43:19 PM PDT by Prime Choice (E=mc^3. Don't drink and derive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: GoBucks2002; killjoy
Someone needs to provide a link to this.

Releasing any statement about this is complete and utter stupidity.

67 posted on 09/06/2005 11:56:40 PM PDT by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Lauretij2

Then what's the point of publishing it?


68 posted on 09/07/2005 12:16:22 AM PDT by McGavin999 (Global Dumbing far more serious threat than Global Warming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: killjoy
Look, we all know that most in the media have absolutely zero morals and they must have all been raised by wolves since they don't seem to have a sense of what is right or wrong, but I'm surprised to find that kind of thinking on this forum.

You don't want to respect the dead, that's your businesss, but most Americans would be highly offended by that kind of lack of respect.

I realize there are people who get some kind of sick thrill out of gore, but they're usually some pretty sick individuals. Surely you wouldn't be one of them, would you?

69 posted on 09/07/2005 12:20:10 AM PDT by McGavin999 (Global Dumbing far more serious threat than Global Warming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

There would be a lot less murdered victims if that idiot Nagin actually thought to post some police officers at the superdome.


70 posted on 09/07/2005 12:22:33 AM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
You don't want to respect the dead, that's your businesss, but most Americans would be highly offended by that kind of lack of respect.

The photos taken during the Tsunami were done for ID purposes. The bodies were in incredibly bad shape and photos were taken to preserve what was left of them. This includes photos of any remaining characteristics such as tattoos, jewelry, deformaties, and anything else that could be used to potentially ID the bodies later on.

After the photos were taken, the bodies were buried along with numbers so if they were identified later, they could be dug up and given a proper cremation (this is Thailand). The photos taken of the corpses were posted publically in the hope that family members could possibly identify the corpses to find their loved ones.

There is nothing 'sick' about it.

71 posted on 09/07/2005 12:31:14 AM PDT by killjoy (Real Men Love Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: expatguy
I think 40,000 dead from this tragedy is a conservative figure.

I agree.
72 posted on 09/07/2005 12:45:42 AM PDT by montanus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: killjoy

The original intent of the photos is one thing, you passing them around the internet is quite another. Do you deny offering to show them to me, or that you've shown them to other freepers?


73 posted on 09/07/2005 12:48:34 AM PDT by McGavin999 (Global Dumbing far more serious threat than Global Warming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: montanus

People also need to take into consideration that many of the bodies will never be found - the same was the case with the tsunami - the tidal surge comes in and then goes out taking many of the bodies with it.


74 posted on 09/07/2005 12:48:42 AM PDT by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
The original intent of the photos is one thing, you passing them around the internet is quite another. Do you deny offering to show them to me, or that you've shown them to other freepers?

Why would I deny it? I was contacted by a few FReepers, who will remain nameless, because they were curious about it. The photos are a matter of public record so I see no problem with someone seeing them. I extended the offer to you since in previous posts you expressed an interest in the subject. There is no thrill involved, trust me. My GF still has nightmares over taking them.

75 posted on 09/07/2005 12:50:51 AM PDT by killjoy (Real Men Love Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: killjoy
I don't have any interest in it at all, never did, never expressed any interest whatsoever in seeing them. The dead are to be respected.

The people going through this horror have enough to deal with, the media has no business adding onto it.

I understand they are publishing these pictures in europe, well, I guess that's to be expected. They have to get their thrills somehow. Common things for common people.

76 posted on 09/07/2005 12:58:35 AM PDT by McGavin999 (Global Dumbing far more serious threat than Global Warming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: expatguy

Well, there are any number of angles from which we can view the problem.

But I look at it this way: we've rescued 38,000 people and rescue operations are still going on. So what about all the people who couldn't get up high enough and drowned in their house? How many people have died from thirst up in their attics? How many sick people died from heat exhaustion or lack of medical care? It's already been eight days.

120,000 people in New Orleans did not have personal transportation. Add to that the people who did have cars but chose to stay. Say 200,000 people stayed in New Orleans. 40,000 have been rescued. Another 60,000 were taken out of the Superdome and Convention Center.

Then you have to add in the dead from outlying parishes and Mississippi.

I think that 40,000 is a working estimate, but as you said, it's a conservative one. People need to be ready to see it go much higher.


77 posted on 09/07/2005 1:09:57 AM PDT by montanus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

I see nothing in the article (I assume it's posted in its entirety) that justifies the headline.


79 posted on 09/07/2005 1:14:01 AM PDT by non-anonymous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Major_Risktaker

Is that your mama?


80 posted on 09/07/2005 1:17:31 AM PDT by McGavin999 (Global Dumbing far more serious threat than Global Warming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson