Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Composition of a Comet Poses a Puzzle for Scientists
NY Times ^ | September 7, 2005 | KENNETH CHANG

Posted on 09/07/2005 12:10:01 PM PDT by neverdem

Although comets form at the frigid edges of the solar system, they appear somehow to contain minerals that form only in the presence of liquid water, and at much warmer temperatures, scientists are reporting today.

On July 4, as planned, part of the Deep Impact spacecraft - essentially an 820-pound, washing machine-size bullet - slammed into the comet Tempel 1 at 23,000 miles an hour. The collision tossed up thousands of tons of ice and dust from the comet that were observed by telescopes on Earth as well as small flotilla of spacecraft.

One of the observers was the Spitzer Space Telescope, a NASA mission that takes pictures in the infrared part of the spectrum. In the burst of light after the collision, Spitzer detected specific colors of infrared light that indicated that Tempel 1 contained clays and carbonates, the minerals of limestone and seashells.

Clays and carbonates both require liquid water to form.

"How do clays and carbonates form in frozen comets where there isn't liquid water?" said Carey M. Lisse, a research scientist at the Applied Physics Laboratory at Johns Hopkins University who is presenting the Spitzer data today at a meeting of the Division for Planetary Sciences in Cambridge, England. "Nobody expected this."

Spitzer also detected minerals known as crystalline silicates. Astronomers had already known that comets contain silicates, but silicates line up in neat crystal structures only when they are warmed to 1,300 degrees Fahrenheit - temperatures reached at around the orbit of Mercury - and then cooled.

"How do you do that and then how do you put that stuff into a comet that forms out by Pluto?" Dr. Lisse said.

Dr. Lisse said that the presence of the clays, carbonates and crystalline silicates indicated that material in the solar system's primordial cloud had somehow...

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: astrochemistry; comets; deepimpact; minerals; nasa; science; tempel1; xplanets
Science
Arrows on a composite image of the comet Tempel 1 point to two areas where the surface is smooth instead of spotted with depressions.
1 posted on 09/07/2005 12:10:02 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

kewl--bump


2 posted on 09/07/2005 12:11:24 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

ping


3 posted on 09/07/2005 12:11:44 PM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Clays and carbonates both require liquid water to form.

Sez them..........

4 posted on 09/07/2005 12:13:27 PM PDT by Red Badger (United States Marine Corps.....An army of WON!...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

bump for later.

Could be that they are interpreting their IR signals with a terracentric view.

It also seems a bit rash to me to be generalizing data for all Oort and Kuiper objects using data from just one.


5 posted on 09/07/2005 12:13:52 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

"Could be that they are interpreting their IR signals with a terracentric view."

How horribly unprogressive. Down with terracentrism!


6 posted on 09/07/2005 12:15:17 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry (Esse Quam Videre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

It looks like an interesting article, but no way am I going to the New York Times to read the rest.


7 posted on 09/07/2005 12:18:01 PM PDT by EternalHope (Boycott everything French forever. Including their vassal nations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
This item (slightly different titles) has been posted twice before:
Deep Impact collision ejected the stuff of life , and
Deep Impact space collision reveals comets to be fluffy balls of powder .
8 posted on 09/07/2005 12:18:14 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Discoveries attributable to the scientific method -- 100%; to creation science -- zero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Metaresearch.org has some explanations for this. Interesting none the less


9 posted on 09/07/2005 12:18:38 PM PDT by Shark24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

"How do clays and carbonates form in frozen comets where there isn't liquid water?"

Remnants from a previous solar system I venture to guess.


10 posted on 09/07/2005 12:19:47 PM PDT by P from Sheb (The W knows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
essentially an 820-pound, washing machine-size bullet...Why didn't they use a hot water heater sized bullet?..or better yet a refrigerator sized bullet? The budget must have been slashed because I believe initial planning was for a piano sized bullet.
11 posted on 09/07/2005 12:21:49 PM PDT by carumba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

It's taken a while for the analysis to start getting some results, as expected. The comet seems to be like a cottonball cone you would buy and possibly eat at the fair. There isn't much substance to it. But what there is would be very useful on the moon if they can get it there.


12 posted on 09/07/2005 12:22:10 PM PDT by RightWhale (We in heep dip trubble)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P from Sheb

or remnants from the early bodies in this solar system.


13 posted on 09/07/2005 12:23:56 PM PDT by King Prout (and the Clinton Legacy continues: like Herpes, it is a gift that keeps on giving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Hmmm... evidence of Tiamat? What do Enki, Enlil, and the rest of the Nibiruians have to say about this? ;-)


14 posted on 09/07/2005 12:24:50 PM PDT by thchronic (www.conservative-talk.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carumba
The budget was tight, so they had to BITE THE BULLET.........
15 posted on 09/07/2005 12:29:11 PM PDT by Red Badger (United States Marine Corps.....An army of WON!...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"How do you do that and then how do you put that stuff into a comet that forms out by Pluto?" Dr. Lisse said.

the obvious answer is that it formed somewhere warmer.

16 posted on 09/07/2005 12:31:09 PM PDT by CzarNicky (The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: King Prout

From the moon's birth perhaps.


17 posted on 09/07/2005 12:32:00 PM PDT by P from Sheb (The W knows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: thchronic

No, it's just another piece of evidence for the exploded planet theory.


18 posted on 09/07/2005 12:33:49 PM PDT by Scarlet Pimpernel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: P from Sheb

or the collision which formed the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter, or any number of other impacts.

al data indicates that the early solar system was a rather hoppin' jernt.


19 posted on 09/07/2005 12:34:17 PM PDT by King Prout (and the Clinton Legacy continues: like Herpes, it is a gift that keeps on giving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: El Gato; JudyB1938; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; ..
E.P.A. to Bar Data From Pesticide Studies Involving Children and Pregnant Women

Panel Recommends Drug (for rheumatoid arthritis)

FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list. Anyone can post any unrelated link as they see fit.

20 posted on 09/07/2005 12:34:50 PM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CzarNicky

or some WHEN warmer


21 posted on 09/07/2005 12:34:57 PM PDT by King Prout (and the Clinton Legacy continues: like Herpes, it is a gift that keeps on giving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

huh???


22 posted on 09/07/2005 12:35:23 PM PDT by King Prout (and the Clinton Legacy continues: like Herpes, it is a gift that keeps on giving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

Check with Greta


23 posted on 09/07/2005 12:37:57 PM PDT by Unicorn (Too many wimps around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
but silicates line up in neat crystal structures only when they are warmed to 1,300 degrees Fahrenheit - temperatures reached at around the orbit of Mercury - and then cooled.

Uh huh, and diamonds can only be formed under high pressure.

(Unless you are growing them commercially in a low pressure chemical vapor deposition reactor)...

24 posted on 09/07/2005 12:38:11 PM PDT by null and void (Does my life *really* need a sarcasm tag????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

"It also seems a bit rash to me to be generalizing data for all Oort and Kuiper objects using data from just one"

Ditto. You know that a Pluto probe goes out next year, right? It's the fastest space vehicle ever made. It'll reach Pluto in 2015, and go on to the Kuiper Belt from there, giving scientists very important data on the early circumstances of life's evolution in the solar system. NASA & planetary scientists are caqlling this "the most important space science project of the next decade".


25 posted on 09/07/2005 12:39:37 PM PDT by George Oh Well
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

That is exactly what I was thinking! LOL


26 posted on 09/07/2005 12:41:06 PM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: thchronic
Tiamat is around?
Someone get Marduk; his job isn't quite finished...
27 posted on 09/07/2005 12:46:22 PM PDT by akorahil (consider this space filled with yet another witty and irreverent tag line instead of this...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tiamat

They're talkin' 'bout you...


28 posted on 09/07/2005 12:50:38 PM PDT by null and void (Does my life *really* need a sarcasm tag????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Its obviously an Ice Rink, anyone who loves hockey could have explained this!

GAME ON!


29 posted on 09/07/2005 12:51:25 PM PDT by Mikey_1962
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: King Prout; All
huh???

Consider it health and science potpourri for my health and science ping list.

I had grief from the admin mods. I was told that I was posting too many stories that required excerpting, and that I should post my health and science stories in chat. In the case of stories that require excerpting, folks have to link to them anyway to read the whole story. I can't enthusiastically post a health or science story to chat. Multiple unrelated links also means I am less likely to be a pest, which means I'm less likely to be asked to delist someone from my ping lists, lists that have only a vague chronological order

30 posted on 09/07/2005 12:51:42 PM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: null and void; tiamat

tiamat quit this site: the racism some displayed on Katrina threads was her "last straw".

I wish she'd reconsider.


31 posted on 09/07/2005 1:05:48 PM PDT by King Prout (and the Clinton Legacy continues: like Herpes, it is a gift that keeps on giving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: King Prout

Damm! I didn't know! I wish she'd reconsider too!!!

I'm gonna miss that Bronze Age Gal.


32 posted on 09/07/2005 1:07:26 PM PDT by null and void (Does my life *really* need a sarcasm tag????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: CzarNicky
the obvious answer is that it formed somewhere warmer.

Ding, ding, ding. We have a winner...

33 posted on 09/07/2005 1:11:17 PM PDT by GOPJ (A person who will lie for you will lie against you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Nice post.

It has long been known that our star; the sun, is a fourth generation star. In other words, it was created from the dust and debris of an earlier star. Which, the earlier star, was formed from the dust and debris from a yet even earlier star. Thisstar as also formed from the debris of an earlier star which was formed from a star that was created from the debris left over from the big bang.

By all accounts, each star had planets, as we know know that systems with planetary bodies are quite common.

Why would it be too difficult to understand that one of these earlier planets had life on it? Is it really too difficult to understand the life form that might be billions of years old?
34 posted on 09/07/2005 2:04:08 PM PDT by vannrox (The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Is it really too difficult to understand the life form that might be billions of years old?

Yeah. Nothing is older than 4004 BC...

35 posted on 09/07/2005 2:20:15 PM PDT by null and void (Does my life *really* need a sarcasm tag????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
For Comparison
36 posted on 09/07/2005 6:55:52 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

God is Life, He's Everything, including a billion years old, and yes He is Alive! So its not to hard to believe "the life form that may be a billion years old." That said, if what you are saying is so obvious, then why wasn't it mentioned by one of the Scientists studying the issue?


37 posted on 09/07/2005 7:00:13 PM PDT by Right in Wisconsin (Get Off of Stupid!!! (General Honore))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic

Thanks.


38 posted on 09/07/2005 7:09:45 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Discoveries attributable to the scientific method -- 100%; to creation science -- zero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: null and void
(Unless you are growing them commercially in a low pressure chemical vapor deposition reactor)...

True. Please help me out with the crystal structure of CVD diamonds. Are they single-crystal cubic?

39 posted on 09/07/2005 7:32:13 PM PDT by Bernard Marx (Don't make the mistake of interpreting my Civility as Servility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx
As far as I know, polycrystalline, grain size in the micron range.

Good for heat spreaders, abrasion resistance, and antistiction coatings.
40 posted on 09/07/2005 8:43:10 PM PDT by null and void (Does my life *really* need a sarcasm tag????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Now you made me go do some work. I was confused because I know CVD techniques are being used to grow gem diamonds and polycrystalline materials are almost impossible to polish. It turns out there are several different techniques, most yielding polycrystalline diamond for industrial applications.

But a single crystal diamond substrate can be used as a template for further single crystal growth in which the synthetic grows with the same crystallographic orientation everywhere on the substrate. (I don't know how they get those substrates but they do). If it's grown to great enough thickness the diamond produced this way can be polished into faceted stones. I just couldn't recall the details.

41 posted on 09/07/2005 9:22:18 PM PDT by Bernard Marx (Don't make the mistake of interpreting my Civility as Servility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx

Ah. My interest was from an engineering materials standpoint. Thanks for the additional information!


42 posted on 09/07/2005 9:28:58 PM PDT by null and void (Does my life *really* need a sarcasm tag????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Right in Wisconsin

Various "scientists" each have their own areas of expertise. A astrophysicist who studies the chemical makeup of stars has a background completely different than an geologist. Actually, scientists are very conservative, and would do their best downplay the discovery. I gather most of the "scientists" are really engineers who are analyzing the data. So any information is most certainly downplayed.


43 posted on 09/08/2005 5:10:59 AM PDT by vannrox (The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

ping


44 posted on 09/20/2005 9:21:11 PM PDT by Bittersweetmd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

third of four


45 posted on 10/05/2005 9:38:00 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated by FR profile on Sunday, August 14, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Catastrophism

46 posted on 05/09/2006 9:16:09 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
Phase diagram of water revised
PhysOrg
Thursday, October 5, 2006
Supercomputer simulations by two Sandia researchers have significantly altered the theoretical diagram universally used by scientists to understand the characteristics of water at extreme temperatures and pressures. The new computational model also expands the known range of water's electrical conductivity. The Sandia theoretical work showed that phase boundaries for "metallic water" -- water with its electrons able to migrate like a metal's -- should be lowered from 7,000 to 4,000 kelvin and from 250 to 100 gigapascals. (A phase boundary describes conditions at which materials change state -- think water changing to steam or ice, or in the present instance, water -- in its pure state an electrical insulator -- becoming a conductor.) The lowered boundary is sure to revise astronomers' calculations of the strength of the magnetic cores of gas-giant planets like Neptune. Because the planet's temperatures and pressures lie partly in the revised sector, its electrically conducting water probably contributes to its magnetic field, formerly thought to be generated only by the planet's core. The calculations agree with experimental measurements in research led by Peter Celliers of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

47 posted on 10/05/2006 10:46:26 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (If I had a nut allergy, I'd be outta here. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson