Skip to comments.
Police Begin Seizing Guns of Civilians
The New York Times ^
| 9 SEPTEMBER 2005
| ALEX BERENSON and JOHN M. BRODER
Posted on 09/09/2005 1:49:01 AM PDT by rdb3
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-302 next last
To: Now_is_The_Time
"I'll own firearms when they become
powerful enough to be effective."
You would be very surprised at how effective a 22lr semi-auto with a good scope can be. You dont have to kill just wound and that man is out.
To: hiredhand
I was thinking the same thing.Hell,these guns were useless anyway,since when it came time to truly need them,the people turned them over to government.Wouldn't work that way here.
42
posted on
09/09/2005 5:56:20 AM PDT
by
quack
To: The Red Zone; rdb3
When the Senator, Governor, Mayor or Police Chief says
A Patriots reply to the Senator, Governor, Mayor or Police Chief would be,
Are you aware that the 2nd Amendment protects the 1st Amendment?
The 1st Amendment is for us to talk about the laws you want to pass or have enforced. Now, if you don't like my questions perhaps we should go to the 2nd Amendment before things get too far out of hand in our America like they did in Germany, Korea and Iraq.
Sir, let me ask you once more,
When was the last time you read the US Constitution, the State Constitution and your Oath of Office?
Do you still support them? Now what will it be? The 1st or the 2nd?
Yes Sir, the choice is yours!
43
posted on
09/09/2005 5:56:29 AM PDT
by
B4Ranch
(The New World Odor is UN-American)
To: quack
I was thinking the same thing.Hell,these guns were useless anyway,since when it came time to truly need them,the people turned them over to government.Wouldn't work that way here.
Yeah...if you're going to GIVE THEM UP, then ya shouldn't have em to begin with!
...wouldn't work that way here either. :-)
They TRULY are reaping the rotten fruit produced from a liberal controlled state down there.
44
posted on
09/09/2005 5:59:54 AM PDT
by
hiredhand
(My kitty disappeared. NOT the rifle!)
To: quack; Admin Moderator
Thanx for pointing that out. This thread is a duplicate. Mod, lock this one up.
If you want a Google GMail account, FReepmail me.
They're going fast!
45
posted on
09/09/2005 6:01:01 AM PDT
by
rdb3
(I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me. --Philippians 4:13)
To: rdb3
There's nothing more important than the preservation of human life. ...even if we have to KILL YOU to do so.
46
posted on
09/09/2005 6:02:20 AM PDT
by
Jeff Head
(www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
To: hiredhand
No law was ordered. The only thing that has to happen is for people to hand over weapons when told to do so. Christiane Amanpour did a report on CNN about mandatory evacuations. She showed a couple, apparently carpenters and roofers, being forced to evacuate from a functional home. She also reported that mandatory evacuations had not yet been ordered.
The anchor asked her about the discrepancy between what the officials were saying and what Christiane had just shown. Christiane was shaking her head incredulously. All she could do was point out that the couple wasn't forced to evacuate. That is, they left on their own, rather than being handcuffed.
Same story here, I guess.
47
posted on
09/09/2005 6:09:10 AM PDT
by
ordinaryguy
(I know many here don't like Christiane Amanpour, but she nailed this issue.)
To: Gefreiter
Why did these writers feel it relevant that the LEOs and soldiers had "assault rifles"? They mentioned it like 3-4 times. Do you really think the "writers" at the NYT have any idea what an assault rifle is? They call any long gun an assault rifle.
48
posted on
09/09/2005 6:11:22 AM PDT
by
ELS
(Vivat Benedictus XVI!)
To: quack
Ok, you can take your chances with AR-15 or AK-47. I think the police and National Guard would have the advantage tho.
49
posted on
09/09/2005 6:11:25 AM PDT
by
Now_is_The_Time
(I'll own firearms when they become powerful enough to be effective.)
To: rdb3
"There's nothing more important than the preservation of human life." And we've brought assault weapons to prove it!
50
posted on
09/09/2005 6:12:09 AM PDT
by
theDentist
(The Dems have put all their eggs in one basket-case: Howard "Belltower" Dean.)
To: PositiveCogins
Good argument, very logical and realistic.
51
posted on
09/09/2005 6:12:34 AM PDT
by
Now_is_The_Time
(I'll own firearms when they become powerful enough to be effective.)
To: rdb3
Isn't religious freedom a freedom?
Psst Have another cup of coffee, relax and then reply. :~)
52
posted on
09/09/2005 6:13:44 AM PDT
by
B4Ranch
(The New World Odor is UN-American)
To: rdb3
Mr. Compass, the police superintendent, said that after a week of near anarchy in the city, no civilians in New Orleans will be allowed to carry pistols, shotguns, or other firearms of any kind. "Only law enforcement are allowed to have weapons," he said.
That order apparently does not apply to the hundreds of security guards whom businesses and some wealthy individuals have hired to protect their property. The guards, who are civilians working for private security firms like Blackwater, are openly carrying M-16s and other assault rifles.
Mr. Compass said that he was aware of the private guards but that the police had no plans to make them give up their weapons.
Blackwater must be there to protect businesses (and those that can afford it)..from being looted by the NO police.
imo
To: rdb3
To: Now_is_The_Time
You've got to be kidding me.Do you think no one,but law enforcement and military know how to arm themselves and use their weapons?Do you think there are no fully auto rifles in the hands of citizens?
Tell ya what,search for the video of the LA bank robbers and see just how well law enforcement could handle TWO GUYS properly prepared.I'm glad you weren't around when our forefathers were outgunned and outnumbered by British military.
55
posted on
09/09/2005 6:19:51 AM PDT
by
quack
To: Now_is_The_Time
All a legal firearm will do is get you killed or in more trouble.There are 6,000,000 dead Jews who probably agreed with you right up to end (almost).
56
posted on
09/09/2005 6:20:21 AM PDT
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
To: quack
Ever heard of an AR-15 or AK-47?Legal and lethal. Yup! Know how to use them too.
57
posted on
09/09/2005 6:21:22 AM PDT
by
StarCMC
(Old Sarge is my hero...doing it right in Iraq! Vaya con Dios, Sarge.)
To: Now_is_The_Time; quack
Ok, you can take your chances with AR-15 or AK-47. I think the police and National Guard would have the advantage tho.
NOT if all "decent" citizens were armed and willing to protect their property! The problem, as I've been saying, is that LA is a leftist controlled state. I don't think there are enough "good" people down there to do any more than simply make a valiant stand!
Your tagline sucks. :-)
58
posted on
09/09/2005 6:22:12 AM PDT
by
hiredhand
(My kitty disappeared. NOT the rifle!)
To: rdb3
These bozos couldn't take on the gangs and hoodlums when they were killing citizens and shooting at relief workers, but now they can can go door to door threatening citizens with illegal confiscation? This is right out of the third world playbook!
59
posted on
09/09/2005 6:24:25 AM PDT
by
claudiustg
(Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
To: 2Am4Sure
I hope the NRA initiates a class-action lawsuit, and seeks punitive damagesBttt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-302 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson