Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CIA asked Dutch govt not to act against A Q Khan
Rediff India Abroad ^ | September 9, 2005

Posted on 09/09/2005 3:10:23 AM PDT by Arjun

CIA asked Dutch govt not to act against A Q Khan September 09, 2005 11:40 IST Last Updated: September 09, 2005 11:51 IST

Former Dutch Premier Ruud Lubbers has said that the Netherlands government, in 1975 and in 1986, had refrained from acting against disgraced Pakistani nuclear scientist Abdul Qadir Khan following requests from the United States Central Intelligence Agency, media reports said.

A Q Khan transferred centrifuges to N Korea

Dutch newspapers, Telegraaf, NRC Handelsblad, and Radio ARGOS quoted Lubbers as saying that BVD, the Dutch intelligence agency, had also asked the ministry of economic affairs in 1975, then headed by him, not to act against Khan.

"I think the American intelligence agency put into practice what is very common there; just give us all the information. And do not arrest that man; just let him go ahead. We will have him followed and that way gain more information," Lubbers told VPRO Argos Radio in an interview.

According to the interview transcript, he asked, "what are we doing here? We have watched this man for 10 years already. Apparently, he is up to some fairly serious things. .... And again I'm told: No, just leave it to the intelligence agencies. .... Yes, in hindsight that is very stupid indeed."

Pak refuses US access to A Q Khan

The economic affairs ministry, then headed by Lubbers, had in its purview Urenco, the uranium enrichment firm in Almelo where Khan worked in 1975 when suspicions about his spying had arisen in the Dutch government circles.

Asked when did he first hear Khan's name, Lubbers said Khan was "a young Pakistani who works there (Urenco) and there are indications that he is doing things he shouldn't. He takes home information and copies it. And we have to sort that out. And maybe deny him entry from now on."

Lubbers, who later rose to become the prime minister of the Netherlands, also said, "I seem to recall from those days that I had once asked whether it is sufficient to merely deny him entry or should we do more. The answer I was given at that time was that the American intelligence agency preferred not to arrest the man but to have him followed."

Complete Coverage: Pakistan's nuclear bazaar

In the radio interview, he maintained that Khan was "caught in the act" by the security regime in Urenco which "reported it to the BVD. The BVD reported it to its counterpart in Washington.

"The counterpart in Washington then follows a course that amounts to: let him go and we will gain more information. And that is where things start to go wrong," Lubbers said.

The Dutch newspapers, Telegraaf and NRC Handelsblad, also reported that the matter was debated in the Netherlands Parliament and that a Dutch businessman appeared before the local courts on charges of trying to supply parts for nuclear bombs to Khan.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aqkhan; india; iraq; islam; islamicbomb; loosenukes; nuclear; pakistan; wmd

1 posted on 09/09/2005 3:10:23 AM PDT by Arjun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Arjun

Although this is presented as a typical CIA bungle, it's not necessarily so.


2 posted on 09/09/2005 3:43:25 AM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkepley

Not necessarily so?
Seems like a major bungle to me.
This AQ Khan crazy has been extremely charitable with stolen goos - nuke tech in this case - and has generously shared with the likes of Iran, N Korea, Libya etc (could this august company get any worse?).
I believe the CIA was acting under political compulsions arising from America's Afghanistan ops against the Soviets which sorely needed Pak's help the.
The chickens are coming home to roost now.
Even as we speak, in the name of help on the war on terror, we've been cutting Pak too much slack on the all-important nuke proliferation issue, methinks.


3 posted on 09/09/2005 3:50:46 AM PDT by voletti (The meaning of life, the universe and everything...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: voletti

Could be. Could be otherwise. Occasionally in the past the CIA has helped see that equipment reached certain countries because they had gotten access to it beforehand. One of the most succesful cold war operations was such. One can hope. I don't work in the CIA and can't be certain. All I'm saying is that what we hear in newspapers is not necessarily the whole story.


4 posted on 09/09/2005 4:17:57 AM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Arjun

The CIA seems totally incapable of doing anything right.


5 posted on 09/09/2005 4:37:49 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Why are you surprised? CIA is formed from the same pool --- American population, which is 50% leftist.
6 posted on 09/09/2005 5:05:21 AM PDT by ExitPurgamentum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Arjun

The CIA and Hogans Goat seem to be compatible.


7 posted on 09/09/2005 5:07:08 AM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExitPurgamentum

I don't believe 50% of the population is compromised of the same radicals you find in the media spotlight.


8 posted on 09/09/2005 5:09:04 AM PDT by mcg2000 (Wolf Blitzer: "They're all so desperate, so poor and so black.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ExitPurgamentum

Given the CIA's employment pool, by definition half are below average intelligence. Common sense would lead one to assume that they are the office directors who run the show and make the decisions.


9 posted on 09/09/2005 5:18:02 AM PDT by gaspar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bkepley

Paging Valerie Plame!


10 posted on 09/09/2005 5:21:21 AM PDT by 6SJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bkepley

How do you figure that this is not necessarily a CIA bungle?


11 posted on 09/09/2005 5:37:58 AM PDT by Piranha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Arjun

How is Khan disgraced? Last I heard, Mushie lionized him...


12 posted on 09/09/2005 5:40:27 AM PDT by Little Ray (I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Nah. Ya just never hear about it when they get it right... The problem disappears and the solution never was...


13 posted on 09/09/2005 5:41:33 AM PDT by Little Ray (I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Arjun

Where is Jack Bauer when we need him. Our real life people are just useless doofuses.


14 posted on 09/09/2005 5:49:01 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Piranha
How do you figure that this is not necessarily a CIA bungle?

I thought I answered that. But notice I said not necessarily.

15 posted on 09/09/2005 5:50:32 AM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mcg2000
I spoke of 50% that voted for Kerry. This has nothing to do with the media.
16 posted on 09/09/2005 7:21:53 AM PDT by ExitPurgamentum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bkepley

You're not necessarily a mindless defender of internationalist bureaucracies that frustrate American national objectives.


17 posted on 09/09/2005 9:35:53 AM PDT by Piranha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Piranha

I guess you're pretty sharp.


18 posted on 09/09/2005 10:07:22 AM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ExitPurgamentum

What percentage of that 50% votes Dem "just because they always have." The belief systems are different and don't reflect the 50% of the population that you've stated - imop.


19 posted on 09/09/2005 6:11:45 PM PDT by mcg2000 (Wolf Blitzer: "They're all so desperate, so poor and so black.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mcg2000
Your point is well taken. But then there must be an proportion of Republican that vote by habit, must it not?
20 posted on 09/09/2005 8:07:16 PM PDT by ExitPurgamentum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mcg2000

an proportion => an equal proportion.
Sorry.


21 posted on 09/09/2005 8:08:08 PM PDT by ExitPurgamentum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson