Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: McGavin999

"That is due to a seperate compact signed between the governors. Sheesh, I really wish you'd read a little before you post, it's embarrassing to have a freeper so uninformed."

The point of the post is that Texas went in before the lawyers gave permission.

And do you deny that none of the helos from the Marines, Army, NAvy waited for no stinkin permission to conduct rescue?


28 posted on 09/10/2005 8:34:16 AM PDT by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: spanalot
What does that have to do with the AP spinning the story?

Your pathological hated of FEMA is well documented. Why do you have to hijack every thread?

31 posted on 09/10/2005 8:44:49 AM PDT by been_lurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: spanalot; Admin Moderator
To those replying to spamalot, he/she/it has been spreading lies, disinformation and unadulterated nonsense ever since day one of this disaster. Several other flying monkeys that are getting the same talking points from Nagin/Blanko/DNC(?) will probably show up shortly to pile it on a little thicker.

Admin Moderator, please take a sampling of this poster's comments over the last few days. I'll think you'll find he/she/it disregards any and all evidence belying his/her/its points and continues to forge ahead with their agenda.

FGS

33 posted on 09/10/2005 9:06:14 AM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: spanalot
The point of the post is that Texas went in before the lawyers gave permission.

And do you deny that none of the helos from the Marines, Army, NAvy waited for no stinkin permission to conduct rescue?

Do you have any evidence that they did not have permission as you claim? It is a wild claim you are making. If find it hard to belive they did not have orders to go in, and that the govenor of the state did not authorize it, something he could be done in a matter of seconds over the phone.

If you have evidence to back up your claim that they went in illegally in Texas, give us a link. If not you are just making crap up to fit your agenda

34 posted on 09/10/2005 9:14:58 AM PDT by On the Road to Serfdom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: spanalot

You are not responding to his point. The agreement between Texas and Louisiana would not be subject to the laws.

You are still wrong.


45 posted on 09/10/2005 9:57:11 AM PDT by sgtyork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: spanalot
Texas didn't have to wait for the lawyers, it was an agreement signed between the governors (a mutual assistance program) long before the disaster struck.

There have been conflicting stories, even today, about what happened. The Red Cross and Salvation army were right there with the aid supplies (how do you suppose they got them) but were turned back by the LA authorities.

Evacuation is the responsibility of the local government. I recall clearly hearing General Honore asking (via the media) to PLEASE have the mayor contact him because he could not find the guy.

I appreciate the fact that you have no loyalty or alliance with the US Constitution, but the rest of us do.

57 posted on 09/10/2005 10:40:27 AM PDT by McGavin999 (We're a First World Country with a Third World Press (Except for Hume & Garrett ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson