Skip to comments.[What] White do-gooders did for black America
Posted on 09/10/2005 8:35:29 PM PDT by saquin
As it quickly became clear that there was a certain demographic skew among the people stranded in New Orleans, journalists began intoning that Hurricane Katrina had stripped bare the continuing racial inequity in America.
The extent to which this was hidden is unclear, actually. An awareness that a tragic disproportion of black Americans are poor has been a hallmark of civic awareness among educated Americans for 40 years now.
The problem is less a lack of awareness than a lack of understanding. The publicly sanctioned take is that white supremacy is why 80% of New Orleanss poor people are black. The civics lesson, we are to think, is that the civil rights revolution left a job undone in an America still hostile to black advancement.
In fact, white America does remain morally culpable but because white leftists in the late 1960s, in the name of enlightenment and benevolence, encouraged the worst in human nature among blacks and even fostered it in legislation. The hordes of poor blacks stuck in the Superdome last week wound up there not because the White Man barred them from doing better, but because certain tragically influential White Men destroyed the fragile but lasting survival skills poor black communities had maintained since the end of slavery.
Few thinking people regret the flower childrens opposition to the Vietnam war, sexism and racial discrimination. But these advances also spelt the demise of old standards of responsibility. Taught that criminality and violence must be judged in proportion to the extent to which poverty and discrimination have coloured ones existence, the enlightened white person saw black violence as understandable.
This meant a largely theatrical black separatist ideology, drastically short on constructive aims, had a public sanction that it had never had before. Hating whitey for its own sake now had an ear among the influential and quickly became the word on the street.
There was a new sense that the disadvantages of being black gave one a pass on civility or even achievement: this was when black teens started teasing black nerds for acting white.
Behaviour that most of a black community would have condemned as counterproductive started to seem normal. Through the late 1960s blacks burnt down their own neighbourhoods as gestures of being fed up. But blacks had been fed up for centuries: why were these the first riots initiated by blacks rather than white thugs when the economy was flush and employment opportunities were opening up as never before? Because the culture had changed, in ways that hindered too many blacks from taking advantage of the civil rights revolution. Meanwhile, the most grievous result of the new consensus was black American historys most under-reported event, the expansion of welfare. Until now, welfare had been a pittance intended for widows, unavailable as long as the father of ones children was able-bodied and accounted for, and granted for as little time as possible.
In 1966, however, a group of white academics in New York developed a plan to bring as many people onto the welfare rolls as possible. Across the country, poor blacks especially were taught to apply for living on the dole even when they had been working for a living, and by 1970 there were 169% more people on welfare nationwide than in 1960.
This was the first time that whites or blacks had taught black people not to work as a form of civil rights. Politicians and bureaucrats jumped on the new opportunity for political patronage and votes, and welfare quickly became a programme that essentially paid young women to have children.
Only in 1996 was welfare limited to five years and focused on training for work. But by then generations of poor blacks had grown up in neighbourhoods where there was no requirement that fathers support their children. Few grew up watching their primary parent work for a living. Most people paid nominal subsidies as rent and were thus less inclined to treat their living spaces well.
The multigenerational welfare family with grandmothers in their forties became typical: young women had babies in their teens because there was no reason not to with welfare waiting to pick up the tab.
This is the hell that most of the people in the Superdome either lived in or knew at close hand, and none of them could help being stamped by it. Welfare reform was only nine years ago. The women now past the five-year cap are mostly struggling in dead-end jobs. This is better than living on the dole. But these women are weighed down by too many kids created under the old regime to have the time or energy to get the education to get beyond where they are. Poor black neighbourhoods are not what they were at the height of the crack epidemic in the 1980s, but they are still a crying shame.
The poor black America that welfare expansion created in 1966 is still with us. Poor young blacks have never known anything else. People as old as 50 have only vague memories of life before it. For 30 years this was a world within a world, as is made clear from how often the Katrina refugees mention it is the first time they have ever left New Orleans.
What Katrina stripped bare, then, was not white supremacy, but that culture matters even if what created the culture was misguided white benevolence. Social scientists neglect that before the 1960s poor blacks knew plenty of economic downturns and plenty more racism.
But before the 1960s the kinds of behaviour so common among the blacks stranded in the Superdome, possibly including multiple rapes, was a fringe phenomenon. Only after the 1960s did it become a community norm.
Wise people tell us that poor blacks in New Orleans went to rack and ruin when low-skill industrial jobs left the city centre, a common argument about cities nationwide. But in cities like Indianapolis where the factories largely stayed close, the same degradation began starting in the late 1960s.
Wise people tell us that housing projects destroyed poor black communities by concentrating too many poor people in one place. But in city after city, these projects were peaceful places until welfare recipients were allowed to move in in large numbers.
All indications are that the reform of welfare in 1996 is bearing fruit in terms of income and the life conditions of children. Hopefully, legions of poor black people who return to New Orleans will take advantage of the job opportunities that rebuilding a city will offer. But what we should all remember from Katrina is a tragic close-up of a group of people staggering after, first, a hideous natural disaster but, ultimately, an equally hideous sociological disaster of 40 years ago.
Bump, as I'm speechless.
Interesting article though. Forward it to Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton.
McWhorter is an outspoken black conservative.
I don't think it was intended in the title but "did for" is a regionalism for "finished off."
Spot on. But will they heed this sage review?
If I understand correctly, blacks continue to vote for the same political party that keeps them trapped in a system designed to keep them poor and dependent
Did anyone see the black guy on Fox this morning who was spewing F this and F that and complaining that his Red Cross debit card had run out and he needed money 'man'.. etc. So FOX says: What do you think is fair, what do you want? Answer: Everyone should be given $20,000 each... this is nothing by a F'n slave ship, that's all they want to do with blacks is put them on a slave ship -- at that they stopped the interview and appologized to the audience.
I'm going to donate to the pet recovery agencies as a result of that interview, and to where I can get money to the children of Katrina -- in Mississippi or Alabama.
AllI have to say is "The Bell Curve"
Whew, glad to hear that. If not he'd be strung up.
The guy got it right. As another poster mentioned, he forgot the race baiting ambulance chasers Jackson, Sharpton et al. Too bad.
And well-spoken to boot.
The "counter-culture" made its greatest inroads among poor blacks and among rich white trust fund babies like Ted Kennedy (or those who could marry an inheritance like John Kerry). Why work for a living when you can whine about "the man" and "injustice".....?
McWhorter's not a Brit but it sure was good of the Sunday Times (UK) to publish this. McWhorter is an American black, one of the smartest commentators around of any race, and the fact that he happens to be black means he is ignored and disdained by those who should listen, the leftist race-hustlers like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton.
Here's something on McWhorter's outstanding career:
McWhorter is an American -- a black American. He is a professor of linguistics at Berkeley, as I recall.
But, you are correct, there is no way that this would be published in the American MSM.
I thought all the thinking Brits left on the same boat as Christopher Hitchens.
Is he the man who was on O'Reilly last week opposite the loon from the Amsterdam News? He was refreshingly candid.
Well, they may have published it, but up until recently McWhorter taught at Berkeley, and lived either there or Oakland. He's not on the Linguistics Dept. website anymore, so don't know where he's gone, but....he's a 'Murrican...
good article. what he says in charts and graphs:
I guess I should ammend that to leave it to the Britts to PUBLISH the truth... I doubt we'll read it in the Slimes.
Excellent post. I resigned from the Department of Public Welfare in Baltimore in 1965 because it was clear to me that welfare did not overcome poverty, it created dependency. I still have that letter of resignation.
Welfare was the political establishment's reaction to the civil rights movement of the 50's. It dragged its black constituency back from the brink of freedom into the cesspool of the government dole.
It is vitally important to remember that Civil Rights legislation was passed over the objections of the Democrat party. Johnson's War on Poverty was a war against the political and economic independence of the black community. It institutionalized poverty and reinforced the ghettos.
My only quarrel with the article is that it does not acknowledge that the white do-gooders were no such thing. They were political hacks who did not want the status quo to change.
White do-gooders did in black America
Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters
Teaching at Berkely and living and Oakland he saw what he writes about first hand. It exists in every large inner City in the Nation.
Tell it like it REALLY is ((((PING))))!
There is nothing that keeps the poor blacks in NO.
What welfare did in the inner cities is what government welfare states did to the indians in the 1800's. "We" never seem to learn from history.
Jackson and his ilk have been the race baiters and everyone cowered in their wake because they didn't want to become headline news. The MSM helped make Jackson a megalomaniac and he can't live without the limelight so he takes any opening he can just to present himself. I'd be interested to know how many blacks Jackson has helped from his OWN pocket.
This author gets it right. Brings to mind New York Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan and his 1964 prognistications.
It explains it all.
bookmark for later
"The Bell Curve" has nothing to do with this. Something changed in the 1960s that made black culture worse than it had been in the previous hundred years. I agree with the author that what changed was the introduction of unearned welfare entitlements.
Wow - this guy's asking for trouble from his brothers.
"those "poor black folks" got themselves out of the flood and to high water."
I suppose you meant "to high ground".
"This disaster proved that folks are just that, folks."
True, although some folks loot more than other folks.
Notice that McWhorter avoids mentioning LBJ and the Democrat congress that kicked off the "War on Poverty?" What's wrong with telling the historical truth of the matter?
"This was the first time that whites or blacks had taught black people not to work as a form of civil rights. Politicians and bureaucrats jumped on the new opportunity for political patronage and votes, and welfare quickly became a programme that essentially paid young women to have children."
This is an excellent summation of Democratic Party policy toward the urban poor in this country. Oh, and let's not forget the university liberals, who still believe that current welfare is not enough.
"Meanwhile, the most grievous result of the new consensus was black American historys most under-reported event, the expansion of welfare. Until now, welfare had been a pittance intended for widows, unavailable as long as the father of ones children was able-bodied and accounted for, and granted for as little time as possible.
"In 1966, however, a group of white academics in New York developed a plan to bring as many people onto the welfare rolls as possible. Across the country, poor blacks especially were taught to apply for living on the dole even when they had been working for a living, and by 1970 there were 169% more people on welfare nationwide than in 1960.
"This was the first time that whites or blacks had taught black people not to work as a form of civil rights. Politicians and bureaucrats jumped on the new opportunity for political patronage and votes, and welfare quickly became a programme that essentially paid young women to have children.
"Only in 1996 was welfare limited to five years and focused on training for work. But by then generations of poor blacks had grown up in neighbourhoods where there was no requirement that fathers support their children. Few grew up watching their primary parent work for a living. Most people paid nominal subsidies as rent and were thus less inclined to treat their living spaces well.
"The multigenerational welfare family with grandmothers in their forties became typical: young women had babies in their teens because there was no reason not to with welfare waiting to pick up the tab.
for sure, some were more well off than others, and just thought the Superdome was going to be "safe"......
about generations living off the dole......that is exactly what Appalachia is like....young grandmas on dissability as well as their children and as well as their grand children.....why work when you can hunt and fish and screw around all day and get freebies from the govt.....
this is all why WORK MUST BE REWARED not belittled....
I look at my taxes....then I think of people even with one child out of wedlock getting those big bucks back from the Feds with the earned income credit.....they get more money back then they paid in....
then again, maybe we taxpayers are the stupid foolish ones.....
Heck, I'm in a wheelchair and work (at home).
why work?.....why bother?....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.