Skip to comments.
U.S. House backs hate crime measure protecting gays
Reuters ^
| 9-14-2005
| Joanne Kenen
Posted on 09/14/2005 4:28:18 PM PDT by COEXERJ145
WASHINGTON, Sept 14 (Reuters) - The U.S. House of Representatives on Wednesday unexpectedly backed a measure to expand federal hate crime protection to gay people, a measure that House conservatives had blocked for years.
The Senate has passed similar legislation, which also expanded protections for the disabled, several times in recent years but House conservatives had argued that these cases should be dealt with on a local or state level without additional federal intervention.
This time the hate crime measure was attached to a bipartisan bill known as the Children's Safety Act aimed at tightening reporting requirements for child sex offenders. Companion legislation has not yet moved through the Senate, so the ultimate fate of the gay protection provision is uncertain.
Still backers were jubilant.
(Excerpt) Read more at alertnet.org ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: 109th; gopbuttsex; gopsellouts; homosexualagenda; hr3132; perverts; rinos; thoughtpolice; wedidnotvoteforthis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200 ... 351-366 next last
To: COEXERJ145
What about a law to protect people with blue eyes, people who are short, people who walk with a limp, people with acne, etc. etc. etc. These people are nuts. A crime against a person is a crime.
2
posted on
09/14/2005 4:29:52 PM PDT
by
mlc9852
To: COEXERJ145
Hate crimes??? Isn't EVERY crime a hate crime, I am soooooo sick of every minority having their own set of rules.
3
posted on
09/14/2005 4:30:51 PM PDT
by
rockabyebaby
(I'm not afraid to say out loud what the rest of you are afraid to admit.)
To: COEXERJ145
backers were jubilant LOL
4
posted on
09/14/2005 4:31:17 PM PDT
by
DBeers
(†)
To: little jeremiah; EdReform; DirtyHarryY2K; Clint N. Suhks; scripter
poing!
The Natural Laws Can Not Be Denied
- Resistance Is Futile!
5
posted on
09/14/2005 4:32:09 PM PDT
by
DBeers
(†)
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: mlc9852
you dont choose to have blue eyes, i dont think they should be protected either though.
To: COEXERJ145
The hate crimes amendment would expand existing federal hate crime program to add sexual orientation, gender, gender identity and disability to federal hate crime laws. It would give grants to the states to help prosecute such crimes. I had better get this off my chest now.
Against nature, queer, fag, abomination!
8
posted on
09/14/2005 4:33:24 PM PDT
by
rocksblues
(I support the war on terror)
To: rockabyebaby
Yeah, all other crimes are: "I LOVE YOU, MAN!!" as the knife is being rammed into the victim's chest for the 12th time.
Good grief!
To: COEXERJ145
I don't think Bush will sign anything like that.
10
posted on
09/14/2005 4:34:22 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
To: rocksblues
I support rocksblues tagline!
11
posted on
09/14/2005 4:35:23 PM PDT
by
rockabyebaby
(I'm not afraid to say out loud what the rest of you are afraid to admit.)
To: rockabyebaby
you slipped! Thinking of gay as a minority with special rights
leaps the fact that homo behavior is an act not a seperate characteristic. Unfortunately our cowardly congress is marching us toward soddam.
If I state that I believe homosexuality to be abnormal and an abomination can I be jailed for hate speech?
If I say a two parent heterosexual marriage is superior for raising children can I be jailed?
.?
12
posted on
09/14/2005 4:35:46 PM PDT
by
ChiMark
To: rocksblues
Unreal. We poor, unfortunate white, straight, able-bodied males are just going to be regular old, vanilla, run of the mill murder victims. Everybody else is going to be a HATE CRIME murder victim.
Wouldn't that make us a MORE attractive target for a perp?
To: COEXERJ145
When do they start jailing my pastors for reading from the Bible?
14
posted on
09/14/2005 4:36:33 PM PDT
by
keats5
To: HiTech RedNeck
He vetoed it in Texas, as I recall.
15
posted on
09/14/2005 4:36:52 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: COEXERJ145
Homosexuality is a fetish, not a lifestyle.
To: keats5
***GASP!!!***
You said the "B" word!!!
To: mn-bush-man
Your post conjures up an interesting image, stab, I love you man, stab, I love you man, bang bang I love ya honey.
This world gets more ridiculous - hourly and btw the pledge of alegiance is unconstitutional, so PLEASE do not say it out loud! I think we should take "in God we trust" off of all our money, that should keep employed for awhile! I can't stand it.......where does this BS end?
18
posted on
09/14/2005 4:38:12 PM PDT
by
rockabyebaby
(I'm not afraid to say out loud what the rest of you are afraid to admit.)
To: ChiMark
ChiMark you are a homophobe and I support you! Here in MA gays have rights over and above the MAJORITY, what happened to MAJORITY RULES? MA is already okaying sodomy, gay marriage is legal here.
19
posted on
09/14/2005 4:40:37 PM PDT
by
rockabyebaby
(I'm not afraid to say out loud what the rest of you are afraid to admit.)
To: bahblahbah
Homosexuality is a fetish, not a lifestyle.To say so will soon be a crime, as it already is in Canada and Sweden.
20
posted on
09/14/2005 4:42:33 PM PDT
by
JCEccles
To: COEXERJ145
Here's a dumb question: what provision of the Constitution authorizes Congress to pass this kind of legislation?
21
posted on
09/14/2005 4:44:42 PM PDT
by
kesg
To: rockabyebaby
I like your tagline also!
22
posted on
09/14/2005 4:45:36 PM PDT
by
rocksblues
(I support the war on terror)
To: HiTech RedNeck
I don't think Bush will sign anything like that. I didn't think a Pubbie-led House would pass it either.
23
posted on
09/14/2005 4:45:40 PM PDT
by
steveegg
($3.00 a gallon is the price you pay for ANWR! Start drilling or stop whining! - HT Falcon4.0)
To: kesg
Zero, Zip, Nada, 0, nothing etc!
24
posted on
09/14/2005 4:46:43 PM PDT
by
rocksblues
(I support the war on terror)
To: COEXERJ145
Whew reuters gets all excited about a tiny amendment to push a bill through, while that amendment will probably be taken out if it ever makes it to a conference committee.
<p.
JMO, it shows reuters immense liberal agenda, but of course some on FR will automatically scream "conservative betrayal" and become candidates for the San Francisco drama queen contest, while all in the while can't see they are being played like a fiddle by reuters.
25
posted on
09/14/2005 4:46:53 PM PDT
by
Dane
( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
To: steveegg
I wonder if it snuck past their noses one more time. There has gotta be a toiletload of stuff that they don't even notice, when a typical bill is the size of a phone book.
26
posted on
09/14/2005 4:47:56 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
To: DBeers
Doesn't jubilant mean the same thing as gay? I mean in a real world not overrun with homophiles.
27
posted on
09/14/2005 4:48:21 PM PDT
by
isrul
To: isrul
28
posted on
09/14/2005 4:49:11 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
To: COEXERJ145

So posting the above picture could soon be a federal "hate crime"?
Oh, give me a break...
29
posted on
09/14/2005 4:51:46 PM PDT
by
vox_freedom
(Fear no evil)
To: HiTech RedNeck
I don't think Bush will sign anything like that. You're kidding, right? Since when has GW found his veto pen?
30
posted on
09/14/2005 4:52:39 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are REALLY stupid.)
To: COEXERJ145; All
Below is the roll call vote.
Link
31
posted on
09/14/2005 4:53:56 PM PDT
by
Dane
( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
To: COEXERJ145
Boy, I sure am glad we elected a Republican House to prevent such stupid bills from being passed. /s
32
posted on
09/14/2005 4:54:23 PM PDT
by
Reagan is King
(Those who say it cannot be done should not interrupt the people doing it)
To: mn-bush-man
Your on to something there. Not only will criminals have this in mind when considering crimes, they will probably be vindicated by the media for "standing up to" the majority.
33
posted on
09/14/2005 4:55:43 PM PDT
by
DilJective
(Property ownership is a right. Taxing us out of our homes is criminal.)
To: COEXERJ145
Oh crap. It's already a crime. This target specific hate crime stuff has GOT to stop. I can't believe our Republicans are pandering like this.
34
posted on
09/14/2005 4:56:23 PM PDT
by
Peach
(South Carolina is praying for our Gulf coast citizens.)
To: HiTech RedNeck
I don't think Bush will sign anything like that. Here is a list of all the bills our President has vetoed since elected the first time.
0
</sarcasm>
35
posted on
09/14/2005 4:56:26 PM PDT
by
itsahoot
(Any country that does not control its borders, is not a country. Ronald Reagan)
To: kesg
what provision of the Constitution authorizes Congress to pass this kind of legislation? I think it is called the RINO provision.
36
posted on
09/14/2005 4:59:16 PM PDT
by
itsahoot
(Any country that does not control its borders, is not a country. Ronald Reagan)
To: COEXERJ145
"U.S. House backs...."
Careful now, with some gays it's hard to tell if that's a hate crime or a sex act.
37
posted on
09/14/2005 4:59:18 PM PDT
by
trubluolyguy
(Hey barkeep, who's leg do ya have to hump to get a dry martini around here?)
To: itsahoot
Well someone should tell him that if he won't veto THIS one, half of the GOP will sit out the next election.
38
posted on
09/14/2005 5:00:06 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
To: Carry_Okie; All; COEXERJ145
Looking at the link I put in reply #31, when tancredo and kuccinich vote the same way on a bill, it's akin to "I don't think were in Kansas anymore, Toto".
39
posted on
09/14/2005 5:00:37 PM PDT
by
Dane
( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
To: EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; I_Love_My_Husband; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping.
This is BAD, BAD, BAD. Very, very bad. I am disgusted. The House has stood up to this vileness for some time even though the good ol' boys in the Senate kept shoving it at them.
Now the principle-less so-called Republicans have surrendered without a shot being fired. I am steamed, angered, sickened, repulsed, and we need to email, write, call President Bush. He has to veto this. Has to.
Freepmail me AND DirtyHarryY2K if you want on/off this pinglist.
Note this abomination:
"add sexual orientation, gender, gender identity"
GENDER IDENTITY! Words cannot express how disgusted I am that so-called Republicans voted for this nastiness. If President Bush signs this, a very, very important line has been crossed.
40
posted on
09/14/2005 5:01:48 PM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
To: COEXERJ145
I want names. I want names.
41
posted on
09/14/2005 5:02:25 PM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
To: HiTech RedNeck
"I don't think Bush will sign anything like that."
I don't know what to expect. I've been dissapointed before...
42
posted on
09/14/2005 5:04:27 PM PDT
by
ottersnot
(Kill a commie for your mommie....Johnnie Ramone. American Rocker and patriot)
To: Reagan is King
Yea. I can't believe I'm reading this story. Guess they had to one up the Judge that threw God out of the pledge today.
43
posted on
09/14/2005 5:05:15 PM PDT
by
planekT
(What a mess.)
To: Dog Gone
See the link to the roll call vote in reply #31, when tancredo and kuccinich vote against the same bill, something ain't kosher.
44
posted on
09/14/2005 5:05:30 PM PDT
by
Dane
( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
To: Dane
"But of course some on FR will automatically scream "conservative betrayal"
Aren't you an OB person too? (Open Borders)
What exactly do you agree with that is considered conservative or american? Not knocking you personally, I really am curious.
45
posted on
09/14/2005 5:05:40 PM PDT
by
trubluolyguy
(Hey barkeep, who's leg do ya have to hump to get a dry martini around here?)
To: little jeremiah; All
46
posted on
09/14/2005 5:06:14 PM PDT
by
JCEccles
To: COEXERJ145
47
posted on
09/14/2005 5:06:48 PM PDT
by
Michael Goldsberry
(an enemy of islam -- Joe Boucher; Leapfrog; Dr.Zoidberg; Lazamataz; ...)
To: little jeremiah
See reply #31 for the roll call vote.
48
posted on
09/14/2005 5:06:59 PM PDT
by
Dane
( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
To: itsahoot
Republican NE (not equal to) Conservative
49
posted on
09/14/2005 5:07:37 PM PDT
by
ottersnot
(Kill a commie for your mommie....Johnnie Ramone. American Rocker and patriot)
To: COEXERJ145; Mo1; Howlin; Peach; BeforeISleep; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; RandallFlagg; ...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200 ... 351-366 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson