Posted on 09/16/2005 8:48:12 AM PDT by lOKKI
Air America Hosts: Farrakhan Not Wrong on Levees
Two hosts at the liberal radio network Air America are defending Nation of Islam leader Minister Louis Farrakhan - saying he's not wrong to suspect that white people deliberately blew up the levees in New Orleans.
"You cannot blame people for coming up with conspiracy theories," Air America host Chuck D. said, after he was asked Thursday about the paranoid pronouncement by MSNBC's Tucker Carlson.
Carlson gave him a second chance to denounce Farrakhan's lunatic declaration, saying, "You're a smart guy. You know that white people didn't blow up the levees to kill black people. You've gotta know that didn't happen."
But the Air America host refused to budge, insisting instead that there was a chance Farrakhan could be right
Chuck D. is really "Chuck Duh". Such extraordinary stupidity is positively mind-boggling. How does this man cross a street without getting run over? OMG but he's stupid.
"You cannot blame people for coming up with conspiracy theories," Air America host Chuck D. said"
Toot the horn and sound the brass!
One man listened to that horse's a$$.
I can sometimes get an Air America station here in S. Texas - on the FM dial. It is unbelievable vile - especially that Randi Rhodes woman. I almost think it will hurt them down here. Are Deomcratics all that rabid?
a broken clock is right twice day....this is still more often then Farrakhan. Actually twice as often.
Yep... and they just can't understand why their ratings are so low. Actually low would be an improvement.
If they are race baiters, it's just fine.
Blowed Up, Sir.
I can sometimes get an Air America station here in S. Texas
Why do you listen to it? do you LIKE liberal screetching and race baiters? Have they blamed the Hurricane on Karl Rove yet?
Off topic but how's Gores channel going? Suggest merger.
I hit scan a lot on the car radio. I don't listen to it on purpose. Well, I did at first just to see what it was like. Now I can't change the channel fast enough!
Looks like they are on to Gov. Blanco.
I still think "Fear of a Black Planet" is a kick-ass album, even if Chuck D is a Chucklehead.
Not a fan of Tucker at all, but this was first mistake...
"insisting instead that there was a chance Farrakhan could be right"
Is there a "chance". Yes there is.
How big of a chance? Very very very very very VERY small chance and its stupid to think otherwise...
You caught me red-handed, Calypso Louie!
I blew up the levees...because I really want to spend even more of my income on insane social engineering projects (and Louis Vuitton handbags for the poor.)
Reprehensible.
I used to listen to them here in central Oregon just to see what the latest dribble is...
Can't listen any longer, they're gone!
Wasn't he part of "Public Enemy", a rap group exhorting violence against various other ethnic and racial groups?
Don't forget the checks cashed in at a strip joint...
They've developed Electile Dysfunction..
I am unable to answer that. Just don't know.
I do know, however, that he is a meathead.
Yep, same guy. Real name is Carlton Ridenhour.
Bush blew up the levees!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The lake Nyos disaster, which claimed 1800 victims in August 1986, was not unprecedented, but never before one had heard of Mother Nature asphyxiating human beings and all terrestrial animals on such a scale in a single and brief event.
Two years previously however, a lethal gas burst originated from the neighbouring lake Monoun, in the same remote area of Cameroon, and killed 37 people, an odd and tragic episode that went almost unnoticed. Both lakes occupy the crater of a supposedly extinct volcano, in a region known by geologists for its numerous gaseous water springs, a common feature of old volcanic areas. The region belongs to the so-called volcanic chain of Cameroon, which ends and culminates 300 km farther south-west at the still active Mt. Cameroon (4,000 m ).
In both cases, without prior notice, a cloud of dense gas erupted from the lake, covering the surrounding area under a deadly blanket several tens of meters thick, for an unknown amount of time. The source of the gas became clear in the aftermath of the disasters, since the normally clear waters of the lakes turned reddish and the lake shores were severely disturbed by waves and strong winds. No one in the path of the cloud managed to escape its lethal effects. Skin discoloration found on some victims were tentatively interpreted as burns, but this diagnosis is still controversial. Witnesses on topographic hights report a loud noise originating from the lake and, in the case of lake Nyos, flashes of light visible over the lake ; both disasters occurred at night, darkness adding to the mystery of these dreadful natural catastrophes.
Ten years later, thanks to the dedication of scientists - such as H. Sigurdsson, K. Tietze, G. Kling, W. Evans, M. Kusakabe and G. Tanyileke, to name but a few - who put both lakes under almost continuous scrutiny, the causes and mechanism of these tragedies are much better understood, albeit not yet completely elucidated.
A dumbass.
Is he related to that idiot, Rob Reiner?
Geez, will you stifle!
Well, he's right about that.
I have a theory that Chuckie D, Calypso Louie, Jesse, and Al blew up the levees so they could blame it on Bush and boost their sagging careers.
And there is a chance I am correct.
They are purposefully repeating crap they either know isn't true, or don't care isn't true. The goal is to foster FUD. I read a column in the Star-Tribune that whined about the slow response and how uncaring Bush was compared to how "I feel your pain" Clinton was during the ND flood, and the piece ended with the same crap, Bush doesn't care about anybody, especially the needy. It was ridiculously snide and hateful. To believe such nonsense one has to be deliberately obtuse.
I hope that panic is justified by their showing at the polls.
This is comedy? Right?
Where was Farrakhan when this happened during the Clinton years?
http://www.powells.com/biblio/62-0226443221-0
Synopses & Reviews
Publisher Comments:
On Thursday, July 13, 1995, Chicagoans awoke to a blistering day in which the temperature would reach 106 degrees. The heat index, which measures how the temperature actually feels on the body, would hit 126 degrees by the time the day was over. Meteorologists had been warning residents about a two-day heat wave, but these temperatures did not end that soon. When the heat wave broke a week later, city streets had buckled; the records for electrical use were shattered; and power grids had failed, leaving residents without electricity for up to two days. And by July 20, over seven hundred people had perished-more than twice the number that died in the Chicago Fire of 1871, twenty times the number of those struck by Hurricane Andrew in 1992--in the great Chicago heat wave, one of the deadliest in American history.
Heat waves in the United States kill more people during a typical year than all other natural disasters combined. Until now, no one could explain either the overwhelming number or the heartbreaking manner of the deaths resulting from the 1995 Chicago heat wave. Meteorologists and medical scientists have been unable to account for the scale of the trauma, and political officials have puzzled over the sources of the city's vulnerability. In Heat Wave, Eric Klinenberg takes us inside the anatomy of the metropolis to conduct what he calls a "social autopsy," examining the social, political, and institutional organs of the city that made this urban disaster so much worse than it ought to have been.
Starting with the question of why so many people died at home alone, Klinenberg investigates why some neighborhoods experienced greater mortality than others, how the city government responded to the crisis, and how journalists, scientists, and public officials reported on and explained these events. Through a combination of years of fieldwork, extensive interviews, and archival research, Klinenberg uncovers how a number of surprising and unsettling forms of social breakdown-including the literal and social isolation of seniors, the institutional abandonment of poor neighborhoods, and the retrenchment of public assistance programs-contributed to the high fatality rates. The human catastrophe, he argues, cannot simply be blamed on the failures of any particular individuals or organizations. For when hundreds of people die behind locked doors and sealed windows, out of contact with friends, family, community groups, and public agencies, everyone is implicated in their demise.
As Klinenberg demonstrates in this incisive and gripping account of the contemporary urban condition, the widening cracks in the social foundations of American cities that the 1995 Chicago heat wave made visible have by no means subsided as the temperatures returned to normal. The forces that affected Chicago so disastrously remain in play in America's cities, and we ignore them at our peril.
About the Author
Eric Klinenberg is an assistant professor of sociology at New York University. He is the coeditor of The Making and Unmaking of Whiteness and a regular contributor to Le Monde Diplomatique.
I would bet on yours before I would bet on theirs.
WOW, there's a classic!
(Think some version of Viagra would do 'em any good? LOL!)
They just came out with it. It's called Votagra.
AAR may not have blamed the hurricane on Bush, but Jesse Jackson did on Larry King Live!
Didn't "Landslide Lyndon" use that?
Until Al Sharpton("The Graft Zeppelin") was seen on the horizon, I thought he may have been in NOLA near a levee, and attacked by someone with a hatpin!
Better talk to Edith!
If Al "Tawana" Sharpton had been pricked at the right time, he could have shoved Katrina back out to sea.
But then, he isn't working for the National Weather Service...he is working for Al!
Well of course. Hey! Maybe one of theirs did it right? Ever think of that? :-) They are the real racists if you ask me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.