Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheSpottedOwl
Suppose it was the other way around ?
Like a flip flop, the man had a child from a prior relationship or marriage, and the man was about to get a inheritance that he wants to shelter his inheritance for his child from a conniving lying snake girlfriend ( who is good at hiding her true motives and character ) who wanted to marry him.
Would he be justified to protect himself and the child's inheritance and financial future from this woman ?
29 posted on 09/18/2005 4:26:26 AM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Prophet in the wilderness

An even better question is why someone want to marry a lying, conniving snake, in the first place?

Just because there is a pre-nup, does not preclude the spouse from contributing money to the marriage. If the amount of money is sizable, then the principle is held in trust, and one can live off the interest.

Inheritances are exempt from the mutual assests considered in a divorce action. Well, they used to be. We don't know how the document was written up. It could have been worded to avoid a fight between the children in case of death. Wills can be successfully challenged. Just look at the mess Anna Nicole Smith went through.

Always remember that the love of money is the root of all evil.


36 posted on 09/18/2005 4:58:22 AM PDT by TheSpottedOwl ("President Bush, start building that wall"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Prophet in the wilderness

Absolutely. Do you think gender matters in this?


210 posted on 09/18/2005 8:11:10 PM PDT by Melas (The dumber the troll, the longer the thread)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson