Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuclear move 'dependent on US'
Herald Sun ^ | 20 September 2005

Posted on 09/19/2005 7:58:15 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher

NORTH Korea says it will not dismantle its nuclear weapons program until the US provides it with a light-water reactor for generating electricity.

Its announcement comes one day after it agreed to disarm in return for pledges of aid and security. "The US should not even dream of the issue of the DPRK's dismantlement of its nuclear deterrent before providing LWRs (light-water reactors), a physical guarantee for confidence-building," a foreign ministry spokesman said.

"This is our just and consistent stand as solid as a deeply rooted rock."

The statement, carried by the official Korean Central News Agency, followed the biggest breakthrough in two years of six-party negotiations over nuclear capability on the Korean peninsula.

In talks in Beijing, North Korea agreed yesterday to abandon its nuclear arms program in return for aid and security pledges.

A joint statement issued by the six nations - North and South Korea, the United States, China, Japan and Russia - said the other five countries would respect Pyongyang's demand for a light-water reactor and discuss it at a later date.

But the foreign ministry spokesman said today that North Korea, a self-avowed nuclear power, would disarm and return to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) only when the US provided it with a light-water reactor.

"As clarified in the joint statement, we will return to the NPT and sign the Safeguards Agreement with the IAEA and comply with it immediately upon the US provision of LWRs, a basis of confidence-building, to us," he said.

"As already clarified more than once, we will feel no need to keep even a single nuclear weapon if the DPRK (North Korea)-US relations are normalised, bilateral confidence is built and we are not exposed to the US nuclear threat any longer.

"What is most essential is, therefore, for the US to provide LWRs to the DPRK as early as possible as evidence proving the former's substantial recognition of the latter's nuclear activity for a peaceful purpose."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: communists; nknukes; northkorea; nuclearpower; nukes; somethingfornothing; us
Why do these people always want something for nothing? (Apart from the fact their system of government sux big time).
1 posted on 09/19/2005 7:58:17 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

NO WAY.........


2 posted on 09/19/2005 7:59:41 PM PDT by stocksthatgoup (Polls = Proof that when the MSM want your opinion they will give it to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Send them a hand crank generater and call it a deal.


3 posted on 09/19/2005 8:00:10 PM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

North Korea changes it's position on nukes faster than most people change their socks.


4 posted on 09/19/2005 8:01:06 PM PDT by Artemis Webb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Why???? Because they're communists; same as our own "gimmie" citizenry.
5 posted on 09/19/2005 8:01:45 PM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

I believe the light water reactors would involve enough material to build many bombs. This whole concept is the result of what Clinton promised them. They violated the agreement while the reactors were being built.


6 posted on 09/19/2005 8:10:02 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher



I think the US should MOVE some NUCLEAR weapons to the ground at a high rate of speed on a few choice locations.


7 posted on 09/19/2005 8:10:55 PM PDT by msnimje (Cogito Ergo Sum Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Because every time they created a new crisis, they got a new concession from us. Positive reinforcement: works for dogs, works for Marxists.


8 posted on 09/19/2005 8:13:12 PM PDT by Lejes Rimul (Paleo and Proud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

I keep expecting the North Koreans to start talking backwards or something. While their grasp of reality leaves a lot to be desired, their mastery of weirdness is astounding.


9 posted on 09/19/2005 8:15:56 PM PDT by claudiustg (Vote for one Democrat, vote for them all...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

Step 1. Have several highly placed people stating publicly that they are worried about the safety protocols being used by NK.
Step 2. After a few months of beating this drum, have a few dark ops people sneak in and set off their own warheads in their bunkers.

Result: No more problems from NK.

Step 3. Start expressing concern that Iran is not following safe “Nukular” protocols…


10 posted on 09/19/2005 8:17:25 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

We should send them two, they'll disarm twice as fast.


11 posted on 09/19/2005 8:42:01 PM PDT by printhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg
While their grasp of reality leaves a lot to be desired, their mastery of weirdness is astounding.

Their "Dear Leader" is the Weirdmeister.

12 posted on 09/19/2005 8:56:50 PM PDT by Wilhelm Tell (True or False? This is not a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

I sold cars for ten years, have you ever negotiated with Koreans? I am surprised they didn't get a reactor and the state of Iowa.


13 posted on 09/19/2005 9:00:19 PM PDT by When do we get liberated? ((God save us from the whining, useless, irrelevent left...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Since when do we play Blackmail?


14 posted on 09/19/2005 9:01:16 PM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

A little history here. China had spies in positions so high in the Truman White House that they knew with certainty they would not be nuked if they invaded. Too bad we didn't have a president who said in private," I hope they invade! I'd nuke'em till they glow then shot'em in the dark!"


15 posted on 09/19/2005 9:05:08 PM PDT by Nateman (Cleaning up the rat nest again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Extortion anyone?


16 posted on 09/19/2005 9:12:29 PM PDT by luvbach1 (Near the belly of the beast in San Diego)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson