Posted on 09/22/2005 4:57:12 AM PDT by grundle
Yeah, poor maintenance is a problem. Cars are so reliable today that people never give a tune-up a second thought. They generally don't need it, but things do go wrong from time to time. A bad oxygen sensor or partially clogged converter can have a significant effect on mileage, but until the idiot light goes on, people are oblivious to the situation. Of course, not everybody is like this, but there are plenty of people that won't even get the oil changed every now and then.
I track my mileage with every tankful, since it is a very good indicator of when things are working properly or when something isn't quite right under the hood.
I know folks who drive with tires at 10 psi. I know folks who don't bother with an oil change til their engine runs dry. And then they need more than an oil change. Their idea of preventive maintenance is waxing the car. Sigh.
Hmm. Sounds like technology has become so advanced that even Cindy Sheehan can write about it.
The EPA "benchmark" is so far removed from real driving conditions as to be genuinely useless.
There is no air resistance.
The "highway" test is conducted at an average speed of 48mph.
Acceleration is limited to under 3mph per second. Vehicles with cylinder deactivation are tweaked to run the entire test on 4 cylinders.
"Vehicles are driven over identical driving patterns by professional drivers in controlled laboratory conditions on a dynamometer. Road forces and aerodynamic forces are fully accounted for in the test."
"The city test is approximately 11 miles long and is a stop and go trip with an average speed of about 20 miles per hour (mph). The trip lasts 31 minutes and has 23 stops. About 18 percent of the time is spent idling (as in waiting for traffic lights). A short freeway driving segment is included in the test. The engine is initially started after being parked overnight."
And the highway test: "The highway is a 10 mile trip with an average speed of 48 mph. The vehicle is started "hot" and there is very little idling and no stops."
While the city test doesn't seem too far off of reality, the highway test ought to be done at realistic highway speeds of 65 or 70 mph. Still, my results match up pretty well with what the EPA predicts.
I have the Toyota Prius, since November, and I am averaging overall about 48.5 in real world driving. It isn't as good as advertised, but twice my last car's mpg, and really fun to drive.
Late to the party here, but I can tell you I get significantly BETTER mileage than the EPA ratings. I'm supposed to get 19/26 in my Taurus and I get 23/32. Shove that in your pipe and smoke it, CR....
And I know several people who own hybrids, and not a single one of them averages less than 42 mpg (1 civic hybrid and 4 priuses).
Oh, and when CR comes out like they did yesterday and claims that the Mercury Mariner is one of the most reliable SUVs out there, but the Ford Escape and Mazda Tribute are not reliable, I say the standard deviation on their measurements is FAR too great to make any conclusions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.