Posted on 09/22/2005 11:51:32 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
fyi - ap followup to your thread of 9/18/05
S.Africa says constitution allows land expropriation ^
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1486949/posts
How long before starvation sets in?
Here we go, another nation swirling down the toilet of racial reparations.
Sounds like Communist propaganda to me. Robbing Hoods, Inc.
Communism...it's whats for dinner.
Oops, post 2 was for you, not tailgunner :)
Get out, Whitey, before it's too late.
I predict drought and famine in S. Africa within 2 years.
We are the world....we are the children...
Before you make any rash moves,black South Africans,talk to your brothers and sisters who are pouring into your country from Zimbabwe.
There has always been plenty of food to go around.
The political thugs who run each "country" use food distribution as a weapon, somewhat like the Soviet Union and China did in their heyday.
Taking away land from those who know how to farm it and giving it to unskilled squatters is the menu for disaster.
May South Africa continue to devolve into what we expect.
I volunteer to adopt a departing Afrikaner family before the coming pogrom.
"We will take things from you on behalf of the common good."
to quote Clevon Little in Blazing Saddles......".....where da white women at"
The whole Robin Hood story has been stolen by the Socialists. They claim that he stole from the rich and gave to the poor. However, even a quick glance at the story will show that he stole from the Government and the Tax Collector and gave to the taxpayers.
There won't be actual drought. Most "drought" is not cause by rain. It is what communist governments blame their lack of food supply on.
Those who refuse to learn from past mistakes are doomed to repeat them again. Such wisdom.... heed it folks.
If the above is true, I don't see anything wrong with this... (putting on my flame suit). :-)
For example: Say your city took your house under "eminent domain," paid a portion of its worth, and gave it to someone else. I think you'd be justified in fighting to get it back the same way - the gov't giving the new owner a portion of its worth to return to you.
It seems more related to eminent domain abuse in this particular case.
Ah yes, all they have to do is distribute whitey's land and wealth and everyone will live happily ever after. It worked so well in Zimbabwe.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.