Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Roberts Nomination Sent to Full Senate
Associated Press ^ | 9/22/2005 | JESSE J. HOLLAND

Posted on 09/22/2005 12:22:20 PM PDT by kellynla

The Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday approved John Roberts' nomination as the next Supreme Court chief justice, virtually assuring his confirmation by the Senate next week.

The official tally of 13-5 was anticlimatic, with the committee's 10 majority Republicans lined up solidly behind the conservative judge's nomination to the full Senate weeks in advance.

But the decision by three Democrats to join Republican efforts to make Roberts the nation's 109th Supreme Court justice outlined the division in the minority caucus over whether Democrats can, or should, mount even symbolic opposition to Roberts to send President Bush a message on his next Supreme Court nomination.

Five Democrats — Sens. Dianne Feinstein of California, Joseph Biden of Delaware, Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts, Charles Schumer of New York and Dick Durbin of Illinois — opposed Roberts in the final vote, and many of the arguments merged with senators' worries about the upcoming replacement for the retiring Sandra Day O'Connor.

Senate Judiciary chairman Arlen Specter, R-Pa., told reporters after the vote he thinks Bush may name a replacement for O'Connor within days of the final vote on Roberts.

White House spokesman Scott McClellan commended the committee "for moving forward in a civil and dignified way," noting the White House hopes this sets an example for considering Bush's second nomination to the court.

Liberal groups that had opposed Roberts expressed disappointment with the committee vote, with Ralph Neas, president of People for the American Way, singling out Sen. Russ Feingold (news, bio, voting record), D-Wis.

He said the Wisconsin Democrat was the only member of his party on the committee who voted in favor of both John Ashcroft to become Bush's first attorney general and now Roberts. Neas said that Feingold's vote was a "tremendous mistake and a tremendous disappointment."

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: 109th; judiciary; roberts; robertshearings; senate; supremes

1 posted on 09/22/2005 12:22:25 PM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kellynla

An evasive Roberts said he may or may not be happy about this, that traditionally a SC justice would be happy at his confirmation by the comitee but he did not think it proper to comment further.


2 posted on 09/22/2005 12:25:25 PM PDT by Ignatius J Reilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Sen. Russ Feingold's vote means that he's running in 08 for President.


3 posted on 09/22/2005 12:25:55 PM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Hmmm, let's see what Feingold thinks helps his Presidential bid more....

Public Opinion more or less on his side, or the endorsement of Ralph Neas?
4 posted on 09/22/2005 12:25:55 PM PDT by .cnI redruM ("They're thin and they were riding bicycles" - Ted Turner on NK malnutrition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Who in the hell is this Ralph Neas? (well, I do know, but...) How does this toad have such power and noteriety???


5 posted on 09/22/2005 12:26:12 PM PDT by el_texicano (Liberals, Socialist, DemocRATS, all touchy, feely, mind numbed robots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

The only question - Will the Democrats filibuster?


6 posted on 09/22/2005 12:26:23 PM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - They want to die for Islam, and we want to kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Fiengold is running for POTUS and knows he would be dead in the gate if he voted no. He will need (will not get) middle America to have a prayer..Same for Hillary which is why I don't think she stands a prayer of the nomination much less the office.


7 posted on 09/22/2005 12:26:43 PM PDT by Les_Miserables
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Les_Miserables

Nah, Feingold was told to vote Yes, as was Kohl. This whole thing was choreographed to make the Democrats look "reasonable."


8 posted on 09/22/2005 12:30:11 PM PDT by Dems_R_Losers (2,4,6,8 - a burka makes me look overweight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Les_Miserables

"Same for Hillary which is why I don't think she stands a prayer of the nomination much less the office"

Yup, despite all the stern warnings from fellow conservatives about the danger of Hillary, I think she will fizzle big time when it really counts....and thank God for that. I have already told several people that, if Hillary is elected President, I wouild commit suicide in the most gruesome manner possible in protest.


9 posted on 09/22/2005 12:30:44 PM PDT by fizziwig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

Anyone of these clowns who believes they can beat the other Clintoon out of the 'Rat nomination for POTUS in '08 needs to quit "polishing their helmet." LOL

I sometimes think that these clowns just run for office so they can eat in nice restaurants and sleep in nice hotels and maybe "get lucky" for months and months...and if they siphon off a few hundred grand in the process...well so be it!


10 posted on 09/22/2005 12:35:16 PM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

"Will the Democrats filibuster?"

that's an easy one...NO

the 'Rats are keeping their powder dry for the next candidate...
and that's when the proverbial manure will hit the fan.


11 posted on 09/22/2005 12:37:02 PM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Funny, I was watching Feingold's speech on C-SPAN and did not stay to see how he voted. I was sure, based on the highly critical tone, that he would vote AGAINST Roberts.

If he's running for POTUS, he will do so in the highly nuanced (i.e., lying) mode of John Kerry.


12 posted on 09/22/2005 12:49:21 PM PDT by neocon1984 (end the idiocy of post-modernism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fizziwig

if Hillary is elected President, I wouild commit suicide in the most gruesome manner possible in protest.

You Wont Be Alone On That My Friend--Why Not Take A Few Libs Off The Planet Before You Go?



13 posted on 09/22/2005 12:52:15 PM PDT by USA-Forever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: fizziwig

Don't think you have much to worry about ....except there are Democrats that are every bit as bad..who do have a shot. That IMHO is our strength, although this time we need to run a candidate who looks good, can articulate without the "uh" sound and who is quick on his feet. Mitch Romney comes to mind tho I don't know his position on important issues. Border, 2nd Amend, Roe, PBA, Taxes, etc.


14 posted on 09/22/2005 1:12:52 PM PDT by Les_Miserables
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ignatius J Reilly

LOLOL.......love it.


15 posted on 09/22/2005 1:17:06 PM PDT by OldFriend (One Man With Courage Makes a Majority ~ Andrew Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: el_texicano

Neas power comes from the folks that care what he has to say.


16 posted on 09/22/2005 1:17:39 PM PDT by OldFriend (One Man With Courage Makes a Majority ~ Andrew Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers
Feingold's yes vote was more sickening than Leahy's vote.

His comments during the hearings were disgustingly negative and demeaning.

Now he votes yes? What a piece of garbage, but then, I ought not be surprised.

17 posted on 09/22/2005 1:19:15 PM PDT by OldFriend (One Man With Courage Makes a Majority ~ Andrew Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

No doubt there is a financial aspect ot running, Sharpton is ample evidence of that but as much as I despise the Demmys I don't think they are so far around the bend as to really run Hillbill. OMO but I don't think she could get elected dog catcher in a national election..Just picture how the other lady executive with an overbite managed to screw up LA in an emergency and ask yourself if you want the country run by her "sister" (who despises the military BTW) during a war with the turban heads.


18 posted on 09/22/2005 1:21:06 PM PDT by Les_Miserables
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: el_texicano
Who in the hell is this Ralph Neas? (well, I do know, but...) How does this toad have such power and noteriety???

Among the ultra left wing crackpots he is an important man.

He is one of the visionary leaders alongside "Mother Sheehan" and "Hanoi John".

19 posted on 09/22/2005 1:34:53 PM PDT by oldbrowser (A living, breathing constitution is a usurpation of the people's sovereignty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Anyone know when the full Senate vote will take place?


20 posted on 09/22/2005 1:46:59 PM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Les_Miserables
Mitch Romney comes to mind tho I don't know his position on important issues. Border, 2nd Amend, Roe, PBA, Taxes, etc.

He is a LOSER

In 1994 he ran against Teddy . He was way ahead early in the polling so the boob giddy with the poll results comes out and says" I DON'T WANT THE SUPPORT OF THE EXTREMISTS NRA OR CHRISTIAN COALITION TYPES "

Hack politician
21 posted on 09/22/2005 1:49:30 PM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
"Five Democrats — Sens. Dianne Feinstein of California, Joseph Biden of Delaware, Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts, Charles Schumer of New York and Dick Durbin of Illinois"

Yeah, 5 Democrats that hate President Bush so much they would sell the Country down the drain. And I bet these rats will be reelected when time comes. Just no hope for some American liberals. Hate blinds and it could destroy our society.
22 posted on 09/22/2005 2:17:50 PM PDT by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
the 'Rats are keeping their powder dry for the next candidate... and that's when the proverbial manure will hit the fan.

In retrospect, then, Bush should have left Roberts as the replacement to O'Connor, since his nomination was so hard to fight. He would have an easier time arguing that a conservative to replace Rehnquist was acceptable.

Now he has allowed them to argue that a conservative judge replacing O'Connor "moves the court to the right."

23 posted on 09/22/2005 2:22:54 PM PDT by ez (What went wrong...Blanco kept the Red Cross out while Nagin kept the refugees in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ez
In retrospect, then, Bush should have left Roberts as the replacement to O'Connor, since his nomination was so hard to fight. He would have an easier time arguing that a conservative to replace Rehnquist was acceptable. Now he has allowed them to argue that a conservative judge replacing O'Connor "moves the court to the right."

To argue thusly is to accept and enshrine bogus leftist cant. There is no precedent for any requirement that a nominee be ideologically similar to the departing justice, or that the existing "balance" of the court must be maintained. This is just leftist B.S. introduced at the present time because we have a President who has promised nominees more conservative than the current court. The "balance", such as it is, should result from the electorate electing successive Presidents based in part on their judicial philosophies. President Bush said what sort of jurists he would nominate, he was twice elected, so let's roll! Leftist propaganda should be scoffed at, rather than accomodated!

24 posted on 09/22/2005 2:44:05 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

one down, but the search uh goes on


25 posted on 09/22/2005 4:04:37 PM PDT by Les_Miserables
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam
To argue thusly is to accept and enshrine bogus leftist cant.

It's not bogus when our own elected R's cater to it. Whether or not I accept it, they do. As long as they're going to shrink away from "bad press," they should consider that when planning.

Trust me, Roberts will be the most conservative judge Bush puts on the court now that he has done this backwards.

26 posted on 09/23/2005 12:54:25 PM PDT by ez (What went wrong...Blanco kept the Red Cross out while Nagin kept the refugees in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson