Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Immigration Pick Criticized
Newsmax | September 22, 2005 | Newsmax

Posted on 09/22/2005 2:19:27 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Julie Myers is 36 years old, a lawyer and a political appointee to the Bush administration with limited executive experience.

Yet, she is slated to become head of one of the nation's most critical security-related agencies, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE), part of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

The Myers appointment, in the wake of FEMA's disastrous handling of the Katrina Hurricane and the resignation of its chief, Michael Brown, has people from both sides of the political aisle raising hackles.

"The Bush administration has barely rebounded from the resignation of horse show organizer Michael ‘Heck of a job' Brown from FEMA, and yet is pushing forward with the nomination of another inexperienced bureaucrat to a key post at the Department of Homeland Security," conservative syndicated columnist Michelle Malkin railed in an article out this week.

Despite the obvious résumé problems, the Bush administration is not likely to back down on the appointment.

Myers' uncle is none other than the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Richard B. Myers.

And Myers' husband is DHS chief Michael Chertoff's current chief of staff, John F. Wood.

Great contacts, but "what exactly are the 36-year-old lawyer's main credentials to solve ... dire national security problems?" asks Malkin in her op-head piece.

"Zip, Nada, Nil," answers Malkin.

Some lawmakers on Capitol Hill are also worried that tapping the relatively inexperienced Myers may engender down the pike another debacle like that of Katrina fall-guy Michael D. Brown, the recently resigned head of Homeland Security's Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

At a Senate hearing last week, rumblings over Myers were apparent, according to the Washington Post, with Sen. George V. Voinovich, R-Ohio, at one point baldly concluding that Myers' résumé indicated that she is "not qualified for the position."

Voinovich further announced at the time that he wanted to meet with Chertoff to discuss Myers' qualifications. "I'd really like to have him spend some time with us, telling us personally why he thinks you're qualified for the job..."

Part of that highly scrutinized résumé indicates that Julie L. Myers was nominated by President Bush on June 26, 2003, and confirmed by the Senate on October 17, 2003, to serve as the assistant secretary for Export Enforcement at the Department of Commerce.

During her brief tenure in her Commerce position, Myers was responsible for developing and coordinating the Department's efforts to prevent, and where necessary, sanction violations of U.S. dual-use export control laws and the anti-boycott provisions of the Export Administration Act.

She also managed Commerce Special Agents who work at eight field offices in the United States, and oversaw the Export Enforcement's international attache program.

At Commerce, Myers oversaw just 170 federal employees and managed a budget of $25 million. In her new job heading up ICE, Myers will be expected to manage more than 20,000 employees and a $4 billion budget.

The White House has been emphasizing that Myers' role in sanctioning violations of U.S. dual-use export control laws and the anti-boycott provisions of the Export Administration Act represents solid law enforcement experience.

As Erin Healy, a White House spokeswoman, told the Washington Post: "She's well-known and respected throughout the law enforcement community ... She has a proven track record as an effective manager."

Prior to joining the Department of Commerce, Myers served as the chief of staff of the Criminal Division for then-assistant attorney general Michael Chertoff at the Department of Justice.

Before that, she served as the deputy assistant secretary for Money Laundering and Financial Crimes at the Department of Treasury. She also worked as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Eastern District of New York and as an Associate Independent Counsel in the Office of Independent Counsel for Kenneth W. Starr.

"I realize that I'm not 80 years old," Myers testified recently on Capitol Hill. "I have a few gray hairs, more coming, but I will seek to work with those who are knowledgeable in this area, who know more than I do."

Malkin couldn't let that nugget slide without comment: "Please, spare us the not-so-clever rejoinders about age and wisdom. Reagan could pull them off. Myers can't. Why hire someone who needs to ‘seek to work' with those ‘who know more than I do' in order to her job?"

After Sept. 11, Immigration, then a Justice Dept. agency, was heavily criticized for failing to stop many of the al Qaida hijackers from entering the U.S. or having them deported, as many of them were here illegally.

Malkin says Myers' appointment in light of Sept. 11 is worrisome.

"Myers may be perfectly capable of writing legal briefs and organizing policy conferences," Malkin writes. "I'm sure her knowledge of export controls is second to none. But as long as the borders are broken and al Qaida continues to exploit lax immigration enforcement, she has no business heading ICE - or any other DHS agency."

The head of ICE is required by statute to have at least five years of experience in both law enforcement and management. That requirement alone spells a world of difference between Myers and Brown, the latter having joined FEMA with no experience in disaster preparedness.

But the experience factor aside, Myers has yet another headache in the works. Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., is threatening to use legislative delaying tactics against Myers' nomination - until he receives a secret FBI memo about terror suspect interrogations that he's been seeking for months, according to the Associated Press.

At the heart of Levin's issue is a heavily abridged May 2004 e-mail from FBI agents seeking guidance about questioning terror suspects held at Guantanamo Bay.

As far back as February, Democratic senators were asking for an unedited version of the memo to see if it mentioned or involved Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, who headed the Justice Department's criminal division from 2001 to 2003.

However, the Justice Department has consistently nixed the request, saying the memos contain "information covered by the Privacy Act," and had nothing to do with Chertoff.

Myers was Chertoff's chief of staff at the time.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aliens; allinthefamily; bordersecurity; bush; bushamnesty; democrats; dhs; doj; fema; generalmyers; georgevoinovich; ice; illegalaliens; immigrantlist; invasionusa; juliemyers; levin; memo; michaelbrown; michaelchertoff; michellemalkin; nepotism; nominations; onthejobtraining; openborders; privacyact; republicans; richardmyers; senate; washingtonpost
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
Perhaps someone with more experience related to illegal immigration would be nice...
1 posted on 09/22/2005 2:19:45 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; alisasny; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; Angelwood; aristeides; Askel5; ...

PING!

I love exposing our government's shenanigans!


2 posted on 09/22/2005 2:21:17 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Hey, Cindy Sheehan, grow up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
This woman may not be qualified. But the dummycrats have no room to complain.

What about Warren Christopher and George Tenet?

The need to apologize for those people first.

Another question. What gives Malkin the moral and scholastic authority to question Myer's qualifications?
3 posted on 09/22/2005 2:23:11 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

She's a bureaucrat and that's all she needs to be. I suspect she's probably going to be good, simply because I have seen so many people here on FR trashing her right from the start. Indicates to me that the trolls are out and active, stirring up GOP ire by innuendo, so she must be perceived as possibly a sound choice.


4 posted on 09/22/2005 2:23:39 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

"What gives Malkin the moral and scholastic authority to question Myer's qualifications?"

Malkin pays her salary. That's what.


5 posted on 09/22/2005 2:24:53 PM PDT by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: taxed2death

So you mean to tell me that every one who pays taxes is qualified to judge if someone is qualified for a National security position?


6 posted on 09/22/2005 2:26:33 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

This is, *ahem*, a less than optimal nomination.

But it is consistent with W's track record on illegal immigration.

Malkin is right. Again.


7 posted on 09/22/2005 2:28:34 PM PDT by surely_you_jest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Absolutely.

I'm paying for this inexperienced lawyer who only got the job because she's someone's niece or cousin or whatever......

I have every right to judge her qualifications. I have every right to question the reasoning behind her appointment.

That's how things work.
8 posted on 09/22/2005 2:29:22 PM PDT by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
So you mean to tell me that every one who pays taxes is qualified to judge if someone is qualified for a National security position?

That is not the same thing as questioning someone's qualifications, which is what you castigated Malkin for. This sounds like an awful pick to me.
9 posted on 09/22/2005 2:29:29 PM PDT by andyk (Go Matt Kenseth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Another question. What gives Malkin the moral and scholastic authority to question Myer's qualifications?

Why does she need "moral and scholastic authority" to question Myers' credentials? By that standard, any voter who has never worked in government would lack the necessary "authority" to question any politician, wouldn't they? I mean, really, how many political analysts have "moral and scholastic authority"?

The questions you should ask yourself is: Is Malkin right?

10 posted on 09/22/2005 2:35:23 PM PDT by TChris ("The central issue is America's credibility and will to prevail" - Goh Chok Tong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Should've appointed Malkin.


11 posted on 09/22/2005 2:37:15 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
This woman may not be qualified. But the dummycrats have no room to complain.

What about Warren Christopher and George Tenet?

The need to apologize for those people first.

What about Klinton, Klinton, Kennedy, Carter, Jessie, Rev Al, Kerry? Where/What are/were their QUALIFICATIONS?

12 posted on 09/22/2005 2:38:00 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (All democrats are ENEMIES of the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: livius
Yep, I suppose those guys over at National Review are a bunch of trolls too? She must be a great choice with all this negativity.

Withdraw Myers

13 posted on 09/22/2005 2:38:57 PM PDT by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

"What gives Malkin the moral and scholastic authority to question Myer's qualifications?"

The same thing that gives you or I the authority to do the same thing.

She's an American citizen. The goverment works for us. Were are not their subjects.


14 posted on 09/22/2005 2:42:40 PM PDT by flashbunny (Do you believe in the Constitution only until it keeps the government from doing what you want?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

"we are" not "were are".


15 posted on 09/22/2005 2:43:02 PM PDT by flashbunny (Do you believe in the Constitution only until it keeps the government from doing what you want?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I'd support her if I got a convincing commitment to ENFORCE OUR IMMIGRATION LAWS... prolly I'll have to settle for an unconvincing one from Hitlary.

Owl_Eagle

(If what I just wrote makes you sad or angry,

 it was probably sarcasm)

16 posted on 09/22/2005 2:43:29 PM PDT by South Hawthorne (In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TChris; flashbunny

Maybe people should give her the chance before the Senate before making up their minds.


17 posted on 09/22/2005 2:44:50 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

President Bush could write a poem that stirred souls, grow food that satiated world hunger, and personally cured cancer and he'd still get "criticized" by the ideological know-nothings in the news media.

It grows old. If this position was "so" important, then why didn't Malkin and others first suggest someone for this position?

The truth is that she and others like her just criticize, they have no proactive, positive policy suggestions and personnel recommendations. She probably just heard about this job opening this week, anyway.

18 posted on 09/22/2005 2:49:16 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

...or maybe they could judge by her experience and qualifications....and see that the only way she meets the requirements of the job is by realllllly stretching the definitions of her experience.

Face it, she's not a good choice. There are much better people out there to do the job.


19 posted on 09/22/2005 3:01:32 PM PDT by flashbunny (Do you believe in the Constitution only until it keeps the government from doing what you want?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Bush immigration pick criticized? More like Bush immigration policy criticized!
20 posted on 09/22/2005 3:43:51 PM PDT by DTogo (U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson