Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Judiciary Supports John Roberts By 13 to 5 Vote
Yahoo News ^ | September 22, 2005 | Thomas Ferraro

Posted on 09/22/2005 6:32:52 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued

The U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday brushed aside concerns of divided Democrats and backed President George W. Bush's nomination of conservative John Roberts to be chief justice of the United States.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; johnroberts; robertshearings
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 09/22/2005 6:32:53 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; Ol' Sparky; Paleo Conservative; ambrose; Salvation

All 55 Republicans are on board (RINO's included), and somewhere around 30 Democrats are opposed.


2 posted on 09/22/2005 6:34:50 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Jeanine Pirro for Senate, Hillary Clinton for Weight Watchers Spokeswoman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Who voted what?


3 posted on 09/22/2005 6:35:41 PM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

to bad mary-jo wasn't around to judge pumpkin head......there is something wrong with this picture when we have ted "hiccup'kennedy and joe "they ain't my words" biden judging judges.......i wonder how the klansmen is gonna vote??? duh!


4 posted on 09/22/2005 6:39:51 PM PDT by fatteddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

Ted Kennedy, Dianne Feinstein, Charles Schumer, Joseph Biden, and Richard Durbin voted "no".


5 posted on 09/22/2005 6:40:57 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Jeanine Pirro for Senate, Hillary Clinton for Weight Watchers Spokeswoman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

Roberts is on his way in. It's the next nomination that will see the real confirmation fight.


6 posted on 09/22/2005 6:46:45 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Jeanine Pirro for Senate, Hillary Clinton for Weight Watchers Spokeswoman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Feingold must have decided that he doesn't want to be the moveon.org 2008 candidate.


7 posted on 09/22/2005 6:47:48 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (I support Mike Pence and Operation Offset)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
Thanks. Was that all of the Dems on committee?

I'll be interested to see how Hillary and the rest of the Dems that are up for reelection in Red States vote.

I'm betting that Nelson(Fl) votes for confirmation.

As for Teddy, shummer, feinstein, biden, and durbin, well, what can we say?
8 posted on 09/22/2005 6:48:49 PM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: fatteddy
KKK Byrd is going to vote yes. Just heard it on Fox. Of course this is due to the fact he's up for reelection in a red state. Same reason he joined the Gang of 14 idiots. Bunch of phonies.
10 posted on 09/22/2005 6:50:58 PM PDT by SoCar (I fully support John Roberts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fatteddy
KKK Byrd is going to vote yes. Just heard it on Fox. Of course this is due to the fact he's up for reelection in a red state. Same reason he joined the Gang of 14 idiots. Bunch of phonies.
11 posted on 09/22/2005 6:51:23 PM PDT by SoCar (I fully support John Roberts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

Leahy, Kohl and Feingold For, all other Demons against.


12 posted on 09/22/2005 6:52:06 PM PDT by msnimje (Cogito Ergo Sum Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoCar

OOOOOPS!!!

BTW, Hillary is voting no.


13 posted on 09/22/2005 6:52:13 PM PDT by SoCar (I fully support John Roberts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SoCar
KKK Byrd is going to vote yes. Just heard it on Fox. Of course this is due to the fact he's up for reelection in a red state

Byrd is a Constitutional Historian as is Roberts. I bet they really had a great private talk and Roberts charmed and impressed him.

14 posted on 09/22/2005 6:54:42 PM PDT by msnimje (Cogito Ergo Sum Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

Thanks.


15 posted on 09/22/2005 6:55:11 PM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: fatteddy
to bad mary-jo wasn't around to judge pumpkin head......there is something wrong with this picture when we have ted "hiccup'kennedy and joe "they ain't my words" biden judging judges.......i wonder how the klansmen is gonna vote??? duh! Two, too, or to? Hoo is pumkin head? I am really kunfoosed. Eye just dont overstand. Mae bee I shud kotak mi doktor, an figgur thiz owt.
16 posted on 09/22/2005 6:59:03 PM PDT by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: msnimje
Byrd is a Constitutional Historian as is Roberts. I bet they really had a great private talk and Roberts charmed and impressed him.

Byrd has **pretensions** to being a constitutional historian. But I've never heard of any sign that the old Grand Master actually is one.

17 posted on 09/22/2005 7:04:21 PM PDT by SpringheelJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

dont get you dude.......spell it out


18 posted on 09/22/2005 7:05:07 PM PDT by fatteddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

I'm sure Feingold wants to create a (phony) image of moderation and that this played into his 'yes' vote, but as with Leahy and the others its probably more so in preparation for the chance that Bush actually nominates a much more solidly known conseravtive for O'Connor's seat. Then they can attck that candidate without mercy and then claim that 'if only Bush had nominated another mainstream conservative (i.e. another O'Connor type they hope) like Roberts' then they wouldn't have to come out so forcefully against the racist, sexist, homophobic, and regressive radical conservative nominee.


19 posted on 09/22/2005 7:14:41 PM PDT by Aetius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

No, there are 8 Democrats on the committee. Pat Leahy, Herb Kohl, and Russ Feingold voted to confirm Roberts.


20 posted on 09/22/2005 7:17:30 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Jeanine Pirro for Senate, Hillary Clinton for Weight Watchers Spokeswoman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson