If it was inadvertent, then why is it oriented towards Mecca?
The alignment with Mecca is about 1/2 of one degree.
Posted on 09/23/2005 8:45:51 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
Radio announcers should be careful if they don't want to be fired for telling the truth about Islam.
That's why the statue of the three soldiers was added later. It toned down the pinko statement somewhat, although it still comes far short of the Iwo Jima memorial.
Libs just hate this country. What else can be said?
Excellent article!
Mike will be okay. His show is wildly popular out here. I'm just surprised the Rocky ran the column.
ping
"proposed 9/11 memorial at Ground Zero in New York is also mired in controversy over its hijacking by guilt-ridden, blame-America-first peaceniks who want to turn it into an oppressed people's museum, including exhibits and seminars on segregation in the U.S., mistreatment if Indians, and abuses of prisoners at Abu Ghraib (that's abuses by U.S. personnel, of course, not Saddam Hussein)."
NYNewsday conducted a poll on this issue with some interesting results.
Freedom Center backers say it will help people understand 9/11 sacrifices. Victims’ families say controversy surrounding the museum will dishonor the dead. Do you think it belongs at the WTC site?
1.3%
Yes, it will be a learning tool. (93 responses)
98.1%
No, the site should be used as a memorial only. (7278 responses)
0.7%
Not sure. (50 responses)
7421 total responses
link: http://www.nynewsday.com/news/local/manhattan/nyc-wtc-poll0923,0,4578562.poll?coll=nyc-homepage-breaking2
This article has so many buzzwords that I feel the need for a flyswatter: "blame-America-first", "Islamofascists", "Let's roll!", "World War IV". You don't need an education to read this, you need a codebook.
I am going to remember that. This simile fits better than OJ's glove. (Or Jacko's, for that matter.)
Rosen targets his pieces to those with a reading level higher than yours.
When was WWIII?
If it was inadvertent, then why is it oriented towards Mecca?
The alignment with Mecca is about 1/2 of one degree.
Another excellent Mike Rosen column.
Rosen targets his pieces to those who agree with him. He's a polemicist, not an essayist, and the language he uses is evidence of that.
The Cold War. Look how many millions of lives were lost in the fight between communism and democracy. Greece, Korea, Malaysia, Vietnam, Cambodia, Cuba, Argentina, and the Congo are just a few of the battlegrounds where this war was fought.
You consider Rosen's comments controversial.
We do not.
Rosen is not a polemicist. You are.
Rosen is a political commentator
Obviously you've never listened to him.
He THRIVES on stubborn libs calling his show. He is at his absolute best when they call in, and the calls always end with bloody libs. He is very methodical in deconstructing their arguments, and usually does so with gusto.
He's a pleasure to listen to. Easily the best on-air debater.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.