I am just taking material from right here on these boards from 'your side'
I see. And where do you hallucinate that you took the following from "these boards from my side"?
All your observations will be bogus and rejected by the peer review board (80% of them) unless it points to a preordained conclusion (that comes from the high council of the peer review board)This is a slanderous misrepresentation of our actual position. It's a lie. Don't pretend that you're just quoting *us* when you write this slander, it's your own creation.
If no favor is being done to conservatism no favor with this childishness, then by the totality of the material here on these boards, we are all in the same club, (well I cant include you account I have not read all of your material). If your are honest you will own that for your 'side'.
I am honest when I state that no, I will not "own that", because it's not true. And I stand by my assessment of how bad it make conservatives look when some of them grossly misrepresent science and those who practice it. It only reinforces the common stereotype of conservatives as being know-nothing, anti-science, anti-intellectual yahoos. Do you think that helps attract more people to the conservative movement? Quite the contrary. I personally know quite a few people who would otherwise be sympathetic to conservatism, but who are unwilling to associate with the movement because they see too many conservatives who do actually act that way. It's the same as how many people are driven away from liberalism by the antics of the hate-America-first crowd among the liberals.
And no one is one my side but me.
That's pretty funny coming from the guy who insists on replying to my individual responses to another individual by making pronouncements about "your gang" and "your side"...