Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Muslim Campground Raided, But Why?
The Hartford Courant ^ | September 27, 2005 | GARY LIBOW, Courant Staff Writer

Posted on 09/27/2005 7:14:21 AM PDT by LurkedLongEnough

EAST HADDAM -- Around town - and as far away as Tennessee - people are wondering why federal agents seized datashak plants and seeds and 19 computer discs from a Muslim campground in Moodus.

First Selectman Brad Parker said Friday's raid on the 18-acre Town Street campground, owned by Darul Uloom Shady Brook Inc., has the town abuzz. FBI agents and officials from the U.S. Department of Agriculture conducted the raid.

"Out on the street, people don't think that [the federal government] would go to that effort for a spinach plant," Parker said.

A Tennessee-based blog called "Ginny's Thoughts and Things" also seeks answers about the East Haddam raid: "I'm totally confused on this one. Could someone explain this to me?"

The federal Office of Inspector General declined to shed any light Monday, citing an ongoing investigation.

[Excerpted... the litigious ctnow.com is the parent website. Click on link under title to read much more.]

(Excerpt) Read more at courant.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Connecticut; US: Missouri; US: New York; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: agriculture; amaranth; bangladesh; cnim; datashak; doa; farm; fbi; india; iog; jihadinamerica; seeds; usda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: adam_az

IIRC that doesn't not stop the police from coming to your door in a community. Gated communities are that way. I'm pretty sure police are allowed to come through the gate without permission.

Remember, this is a community, not an individual private residence.


41 posted on 09/27/2005 10:12:17 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
"Police can come to your door if they like."

If your door is accessable, but if you have a fence with a locked gate, then they can only come to the gate. Remember the fuss over the police climbing OJ's gate? Entering a locked property requires either a warrant based upon evidence, or the first hand knowledge that a felony is in progress.

42 posted on 09/27/2005 10:19:08 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Atheist and Fool are synonyms; Evolution is where fools hide from the sunrise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

That's for a private home, not a community.

For instance, the police can enter an aprtment building but not the individual apartments. They can walk into a fraternity house or dorm but not into bedrooms.


43 posted on 09/27/2005 10:23:06 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
If you stop them from stepping on your property, you are a terrorist.

So that applies to the celebrity 'compounds' and other gated property as well?

44 posted on 09/27/2005 12:10:06 PM PDT by technochick99 (Firearm of choice: Sig Sauer....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: technochick99

If they are communities, it does.


45 posted on 09/27/2005 12:11:18 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Where is this place? Is it not fully private property then? Or is it a community with public streets running through it?


46 posted on 09/27/2005 12:12:52 PM PDT by technochick99 (Firearm of choice: Sig Sauer....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: technochick99

It's in southside Va.

Our Homeowners Association owns the streets in our neighborhood so technically it is private property. We built and maintain them. I can't imagine a policeman has to ask permission everytime he drives on our roads.


47 posted on 09/27/2005 12:16:35 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Fine, you can't imagine it, and yes police can walk into apartments.

The fact remains that communities can and do exist that are located entirely on private properties and neither want nor use services provided by neighboring communities. This means their roads are private roads, neither build nor maintained by public funds. This has ramifications or their ability to receive other public services. This means that police have to either get permission or execute a legal warrant to enter.

You can call all such communities terrorist if you want - it just lowers you credibility a little.

48 posted on 09/27/2005 12:59:52 PM PDT by delacoert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: delacoert
I live in one of those communities. And the police can come and go as they please.

You can call all such communities terrorist if you want

And you need to learn to read.

49 posted on 09/27/2005 1:53:38 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough

The campers kept exploding around the ol' kamp fire.


50 posted on 09/27/2005 5:00:42 PM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (Show me a liberal and I'll show you a head and a heart, designed for nothing but cracking walnuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

In a FREE society, that is EXACTLY what would happen, not only for police but ANY government agent. And rightly so. If he has a properly signed warrant and it is before dark, the end of the LEGAL time for service, that's another issue. If a cop walks by and hears a scream and breaks in, he had best be right or be willing to pay the price if it's just the householder and his wife getting a little extra frisky...


51 posted on 09/27/2005 5:28:01 PM PDT by dcwusmc ("The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
<Sigh>

In post #2 you describe exactly what I'm talking about so I know you understand the concept.

In the situation you cite, the police wait outside the gate and the person sought by the police goes to the gate. Everything is legal, and the police aren't setting foot on the property. Your allusion to Waco makes no sense unless the police have served a warrant with which the occupants have failed to comply.

And I guess I'll just have to keep working on my reading skills.

52 posted on 09/27/2005 8:20:24 PM PDT by delacoert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: delacoert
Here's what you thought you read

You can call all such communities terrorist if you want

But I never said that. It's just a strawman you created.

Are you saying the police have to wait outside a gated community until someone comes to let them in?

53 posted on 09/28/2005 5:11:15 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
If by gated community you mean a neighborhood in an incorporated municipality with a little gatehouse manned by an employee of a homeowners association, then no, the police just get waived through.

But you know that's not what we're talking about. Right? You described exactly what we're talking about in post #2. If the property is fenced and the gate is locked, police have to have a proper warrant to break through the gate and walk in. Otherwise they have to do what everyone else visiting the "compound" does. If no one is expecting them and there's no call box, they'll just have to blow their horn and wait until some one comes to the gait.

It is clear to me that you understand exactly what is being posted by me and others in this thread. I don't understand why you keep trying to belabor a nuanced interpretation by using the ambiguous term, "gated community."

Private property behind a fence and locked gate presents a barrier to public access, including the police. It is not insurmountable, you just have to get permission to enter - either from the property owner or a judge.

54 posted on 09/28/2005 7:23:28 AM PDT by delacoert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: delacoert

I never said the gate was locked. I said they had to wait for someone to come to the gate. This is not a house. It's a community. It's no different from a condominium complex.

The problem is that you assume too much.

So you are saying that police, fire and rescue have to wait at a gated community for someone to give them permission to enter.


55 posted on 09/28/2005 7:29:43 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
There's either a gate that resticts access or there's not. The property owners either stop police at the gate or they don't. If the police know they're welcome to enter and they still politely wait at the gait then good for them. If the police know that the property owners restrict access because a gate is locked, or just closed with appropriate signage (i.e., keep out, no trespassing, or whatever) then they have to wait at the gait.

If the police, the fire department or an ambulance is called and asked to come then it is clear they have permission to enter, so I guess that's not what you are talking about. However, if there's an issue of law enforcement involved then you are correct, I am saying that permission may be required.

56 posted on 09/28/2005 10:19:17 AM PDT by delacoert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell

Durqadurqa mohamed jihad


57 posted on 11/04/2005 5:11:59 PM PST by ketelone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough

"But why?"

Wouldn't "But why not sooner?" make more sense????


58 posted on 11/04/2005 5:57:14 PM PST by F.J. Mitchell (America's Achilles Heel is the liberal democrats and the dung heels who mislead them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson