Skip to comments.
How your senator voted on John Roberts
MSNBC ^
| Sept 29, 2005
| msnbc
Posted on 09/29/2005 2:53:51 PM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican
Final count 78 - Yeas, 22 - Nays
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9503382/
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; bushsfault; chiefjustice; johnroberts; robertshearings; rollcall; scotus; souterredux; theunknown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-112 next last
No surprises in who voted against him. Its the usual list of obstructionists & liberal panders including Turbin Durbin, Kennedy, Kerry, Clinton, Cantwell, and pair of unionheads from Hawaii.
To: Proud_USA_Republican
Not even gonna look. I know how they voted.
2
posted on
09/29/2005 2:54:37 PM PDT
by
madison10
To: Proud_USA_Republican
Hey Chuckie Schumer. HA..HA.
3
posted on
09/29/2005 2:55:13 PM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(Don't get stuck on stupid now, reporters)
To: Proud_USA_Republican
My two senators were no surprise. What an embarrassment.
With any luck we will get a new Republican Senator and Governor.
4
posted on
09/29/2005 2:56:11 PM PDT
by
mware
(Keeper of the I's)
To: Proud_USA_Republican
My two senators were no surprise. What an embarrassment.
With any luck we will get a new Republican Senator and Governor.
5
posted on
09/29/2005 2:56:14 PM PDT
by
mware
(Keeper of the I's)
To: Proud_USA_Republican
Add Obama to the mope list. What does he have to prove with that vote except a lack of testicles?
6
posted on
09/29/2005 2:57:27 PM PDT
by
Thebaddog
(How's yer dogs?)
To: Proud_USA_Republican
7
posted on
09/29/2005 2:58:16 PM PDT
by
TravisBickle
(NOPD Badge # 714)
To: Proud_USA_Republican
Well, well, well. Looks like the (D) Senators from Red States all voted for Roberts. What a shock.
8
posted on
09/29/2005 3:00:07 PM PDT
by
GianniV
To: Proud_USA_Republican
I live in California. I don't even have to look.
To: Proud_USA_Republican
I got two Democratic senators so they could afford to play both sides. Stabenow nay, Levin yea.
10
posted on
09/29/2005 3:00:56 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
To: Proud_USA_Republican
The Swimmer and the Windsurfer... no surprise.
To: Proud_USA_Republican
Go Pat. Go Sam Good goin Kansas. And how could you vote against your own surname?
12
posted on
09/29/2005 3:02:51 PM PDT
by
wequalswinner
(Jest becuz you put yer boots in the oven, don't make it bread)
To: Proud_USA_Republican
I'm surprised... Patty Murray (D-Washington) voted Yay.
13
posted on
09/29/2005 3:02:54 PM PDT
by
birbear
(Admit it. you clicked on the "I have already previewed" button without actually previewing the post.)
To: TravisBickle
There is hope .... and a God!
Oregon: 2 YEAS! (yes Wyden vote yea .... I guess his new wife is reeling him in ....)
14
posted on
09/29/2005 3:04:02 PM PDT
by
Yasotay
To: Proud_USA_Republican
Both Bingaman and Domenici voted Yes!
Viva Nuevo Mexico!
15
posted on
09/29/2005 3:04:16 PM PDT
by
Disambiguator
(Making accusations of racism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.)
To: Proud_USA_Republican
Oh they disgraced me as usual. I don't even have to look to know that.
16
posted on
09/29/2005 3:04:26 PM PDT
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Machina improba! Vel mihi ede potum vel mihi redde nummos meos!)
To: Proud_USA_Republican
I think Bayh was a surprise "no" vote
To: Proud_USA_Republican
Among the DemocRATS, it was the moonbats and presidential hopefuls who voted against. Evan Bayh, D-IN, who gave Roberts a backhanded introduction at the hearings (slipped in after the proceedings had begun and sat at the opposite end of the table so they couldn't be photographed togehter), voted NAY. IMO, he's the biggest threat in '08, not Her Royal Heinous.
18
posted on
09/29/2005 3:05:00 PM PDT
by
quark
To: Proud_USA_Republican
we good and loyal Americans here in Hawaii , once again hang our heads in shame of the pathetic ways our elected puppets
cast their votes.....
19
posted on
09/29/2005 3:05:26 PM PDT
by
injin
To: GianniV
Well, well, well. Looks like the (D) Senators from Red States all voted for Roberts. What a shock.Not Dingy Harry... (D NV - Red State)
20
posted on
09/29/2005 3:05:30 PM PDT
by
America_Right
(I serve the cause of freedom. What do you do? -SECDEF Heller from "24")
To: quark
21
posted on
09/29/2005 3:05:39 PM PDT
by
quark
To: Proud_USA_Republican
No doubt my lice voted NO
22
posted on
09/29/2005 3:05:49 PM PDT
by
OldFriend
(One Man With Courage Makes a Majority ~ Andrew Jackson)
To: madison10
23
posted on
09/29/2005 3:06:44 PM PDT
by
mtbopfuyn
(Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)
To: Proud_USA_Republican
Wow - Florida did good. Our Demonrat senator and our RINO both voted yes!
24
posted on
09/29/2005 3:07:07 PM PDT
by
PatriotGirl827
(There are no short cuts to any place worth going.)
To: birbear
####I'm surprised... Patty Murray (D-Washington) voted Yay.####
Are you sure? I thought she voted Nay.
25
posted on
09/29/2005 3:07:38 PM PDT
by
puroresu
(Conservatism is an observation; Liberalism is an ideology)
To: Proud_USA_Republican
Twenty two of the most leftist/communist/senators vote nay and both of my millionaire Senators were on the list.
Go New Jersey!
26
posted on
09/29/2005 3:08:25 PM PDT
by
rocksblues
(I support the war on terror)
To: Proud_USA_Republican
How did Ted Stevens vote? Can I guess?
27
posted on
09/29/2005 3:08:36 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: Proud_USA_Republican
No surprise here- Coleman (Y), Dayton (N).
28
posted on
09/29/2005 3:11:13 PM PDT
by
95 Bravo
("Freedom is not free.")
To: Proud_USA_Republican; John Lenin
Can you believe the following senators voted
yea?
Carl Lenin (D) MI
Pat (Leaky) Leahy (D) VT
Jim Jeffords (I) VT
Russ Feingold (D) WI
Herb Khol (D) WI
29
posted on
09/29/2005 3:11:47 PM PDT
by
Paleo Conservative
(France is an example of retrograde chordate evolution.)
To: Proud_USA_Republican
I can't believe both Lincoln and Pryor (D, Arkansas) BOTH voted for Roberts!
30
posted on
09/29/2005 3:11:57 PM PDT
by
Budge
(<>< Sit Nomen Domini benedictum. <><)
To: Proud_USA_Republican
OMG...Patty Murray voted yes....
Now I think she is only 99.9999% stupid.
31
posted on
09/29/2005 3:12:03 PM PDT
by
paulat
To: bikepacker67
'The Swimmer and the Windsurfer... no surprise.'
~~~~~~~~~~
The Swimmer and the Traitor, if you please....
:)
32
posted on
09/29/2005 3:12:06 PM PDT
by
bitt
('It is a good thing the Commander in Chief is tough as nails.' (FR))
To: Proud_USA_Republican
I don't have to look. I have two spineless, Marxist, America-hating commies for senators: Turbin and Osama.
33
posted on
09/29/2005 3:12:54 PM PDT
by
Rollee
To: birbear
You were right. I double-checked the roll call and Murray did vote "Yay". I'm surprised! (Though most of the 'Rats who voted for Roberts only did so because he was going to win approval no matter what).
34
posted on
09/29/2005 3:14:13 PM PDT
by
puroresu
(Conservatism is an observation; Liberalism is an ideology)
To: MNJohnnie
Chuckie and Hillary, the gruesome twosome from New York!
Hey Chuckie, sit back and watch how I do it!
35
posted on
09/29/2005 3:16:53 PM PDT
by
tuvals
(America First - Support Our Troops!)
To: Proud_USA_Republican
Lemme guess - my RAT representatives - Lousenberg and Boring - voted against the mainstream of America.
I hate it when the Media rats have been allowed to define mainstream.The majority of the voting public voted for George Bush. That same voting public overwhelmingly agree that judges should not legislate from the bench, believe in In God We Trust, are OK with a moment of silence in public schools, do not think same sex marriage is protected by the constition and, do not believe in partial birth abortion.Yet - these positions are presented by the Media RATS as extreme and the opposite of these beliefs are presented as mainstream.
John Roberts was and will be a mainstream jurist - our PR efforts for the next nominee need to be presented as such.
36
posted on
09/29/2005 3:18:40 PM PDT
by
capydick
(or)
To: Proud_USA_Republican
Connecticut.
Blue-as-blue-state gets.
Two Democrat Senators, one just re-elected, the other in absolutely no danger of ever being defeated.
Old bulls of the Democratic Party.
Chris Dodd - yea.
Joe Lieberman - yea.
I have observed that the Democratic politicians of this Land of Steady Habits are Liberal as Liberal can be, but are usually not crazy.
Would any other state in New England actually EXECUTE somebody who desperately needed it?
Connecticut did.
I can stand Connecticut Democrats. Perhaps the state is just too rich to be too nuts.
37
posted on
09/29/2005 3:19:29 PM PDT
by
Vicomte13
(Et alors?)
To: Proud_USA_Republican
Only 22 nos? NOW, People for the American Way, and the other assorted liberal moonbats sure are powerful.
To: PatriotGirl827
I was thinking the same thing. I have not been here long enough to have a really good handle on what they'll do tho.
I'm just glad my Rep is not a Senator instead. I hang my head in shame about him all the time.
susie
39
posted on
09/29/2005 3:20:31 PM PDT
by
brytlea
(All you need as ID to vote in FL is your Costco card...)
To: Paleo Conservative
Carl Lenin (D) MI
Pat (Leaky) Leahy (D) VT
Jim Jeffords (I) VT
Russ Feingold (D) WI
Herb Khol (D) WI
Guess who the Dim "moderates" the Media will be hyping to show the comming fillibuster is a "legitimate respoinse" to Bush's extremists nominee are going to be be?
40
posted on
09/29/2005 3:22:30 PM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(Don't get stuck on stupid now, reporters)
To: Proud_USA_Republican
To: Proud_USA_Republican
No surprises in who voted against him. Its the usual list of obstructionists & liberal panders including Turbin Durbin, Kennedy, Kerry, Clinton, Cantwell, and pair of unionheads from Hawaii.The list, of course, includes every Dim senator who has '08 aspirations. Who says this vote wasn't partisan?
42
posted on
09/29/2005 3:23:35 PM PDT
by
No Longer Free State
(No event has just one cause, no person has just one motive, no action has just the intended effect.)
To: Proud_USA_Republican
The two SD Senators voted yea, no real surprise Johnson voted yea though, he's already looking to 2008, and his Mike Rounds problem. I am, however, surprised Patty "Osama Momma" Murry voted yea.
43
posted on
09/29/2005 3:23:42 PM PDT
by
SoDak
To: quark
Yeah, all the Democrat Presidential hopefuls voted nay. Would you want a President who's afraid of NOW?
To: birbear
I'm surprised... Patty Murray (D-Washington) voted Yay.That can only be because she's so dense she hit the wrong button.
45
posted on
09/29/2005 3:24:17 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: quark
Hey, hey, I really like that phrase you made up "Your royal heinous", kinda like "Your royal hiney" too. LOL
46
posted on
09/29/2005 3:24:26 PM PDT
by
wequalswinner
(Jest becuz you put yer boots in the oven, don't make it bread)
To: PatriotGirl827
Let's hope that Jim Burling was wrong about Roberts perspective on property rights, as he wrote in that article.
Many in Florida have done well, very well, off of abusing the property rights of the citizenry. When a Liberal like Nelson votes for a man who shares Jeb's view that we have enough property rights protections already, I get acutely nervous.
But, the brothers Bush seem to have a much better understanding of politics than I or the Democrats have.
Wouldn't it be nice if Roberts was more of an originalist than his action in Nevada indicated?
47
posted on
09/29/2005 3:24:27 PM PDT
by
GladesGuru
("In a society predicated upon liberty, it is essential to examine principles)
To: Vicomte13
Among this country's democRATS,Lieberman is one of the
least disgusting.That's why he's so ferociously hated over at Marxist Underground.
To: GianniV
Well, well, well. Looks like the (D) Senators from Red States all voted for Roberts. What a shock. Well, not "Dungheap" Harkin -- he voted NO.
Iowa is a barely red state though.
To: madison10
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-112 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson