Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Abizaid Details al Qaeda's Long-Term Goals
American Forces Press Service ^ | Sep 29, 2005 | Jim Garamone

Posted on 09/29/2005 6:16:58 PM PDT by SandRat

WASHINGTON, Sept. 29, 2005 – Al Qaeda terrorists hope to drive American influence from the Middle East and install a global Muslim leader in Saudi Arabia, Army Gen. John Abizaid said today. Speaking during Senate testimony, Abizaid, chief of U.S. Central Command, said al Qaeda's objectives are clear. "They believe in a jihad, a jihad to overthrow the legitimate regimes in the region," he said. "In order to do that, they first must drive America from the region."

Al Qaeda believes the most important prize is Saudi Arabia, which is home to the holy shrines in Mecca and Medina. If al Qaeda terrorists manage to take control of Saudi Arabia, they will try to create and expand their influence in the region and establish a caliphate, Abizaid said.

The term harkens back to the immediate successors of Muhammed and means a land led by a supreme secular and religious ruler. Al Qaeda insists that re-establishing a caliphate would mean that one man, as the successor to Muhammad, would possess clear political, military and legal standing as the global Muslim leader.

Abizaid said al Qaeda would then apply a very narrow, strict interpretation of Sharia, Islamic law, not believed in or practiced anywhere else in the world today. Such conquest in the Middle East "would certainly allow al Qaeda and their proxies to control a vast oil wealth that exists in the region," he said. "They intend to destroy Israel in the process, as well."

The next goal would be to expand into non-Arab Islamic countries. This would include the middle of Africa, South Asia and Southeast Asia, the general said. The organization would operate from these areas and also from cyberspace. He said al Qaeda uses to Internet to transmit their hatred. "They aim to take advantage of open societies and will strike at those societies when they are ready at their time and place of choosing," he said.

In an allusion that is probably distasteful to American companies, Abizaid said al Qaeda is not a monolith like IBM. Rather, it is a franchise operation like McDonald's. This makes it very difficult to cut off the head of the organization. The group uses any and all means to further its goals: drugs, smuggling, so-called charitable organizations and others.

To beat al Qaeda and affiliate organizations requires military action but also "all elements of international and national power to put pressure throughout the network over time in order to squeeze the ideology, defeat its sources of strength, and ultimately allow the good people of the region to have the courage and the ability to stand against this type of organization," Abizaid said.

The United States and its coalition allies are doing this, he said. The key to success is helping the people of the region develop the will and capabilities to challenge al Qaeda. The "long war against terror" will be won by "self-reliant partners in the region who are willing to face the enemy within their own countries," he said.

U.S. and coalition forces must remain in the region long enough to "stabilize Afghanistan, stabilize Iraq, continue to deter Syria and Iran, and protect the flow of oil vital to all the peoples of the world and the economies of the region," he said.

The United States must make it clear that America has no territorial designs. "We must make clear that we fight with them out of mutual respect and mutual benefit," Abizaid said.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: abizaid; alqaeda; alqaedas; alqaedastrategy; details; globaljihad; goals; longterm; saudiarabia; terror; terrorists

1 posted on 09/29/2005 6:16:59 PM PDT by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SandRat

This is why there is no "Iraq War".

There is the Iraq Theatre of the Global War On Terror.
Yep, it doesn't roll off the tongue, but that's no
excuse for letting the disloyal opposition frame the debate.

The "Iraq War" ended when Saddam's army ceased organized
resistance. What we are fighting in Iraq today may not
even be composed, in the majority, of Iraqis.


2 posted on 09/29/2005 6:23:23 PM PDT by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

"Overthrow the legitimate regimes....?" "...Legitimate...?"

Not too many of those in the middle east.


3 posted on 09/29/2005 6:36:23 PM PDT by PeteB570
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Their plan for Saudi Arabia sounds just like the present government. Remember, they prohibited schoolgirls from leaving a burning school without their burkas; they send them back in and of course the girls all died. That seems about as extreme as it can get.

The present Saudi government also seeks expansion by setting up and funding mosques in other countries.

How are Al Queda's Sharia and policies different from what's being done in Saudi Arabia right now?

D


4 posted on 09/29/2005 6:36:45 PM PDT by daviddennis (;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Their plan for Saudi Arabia sounds just like the present government. Remember, they prohibited schoolgirls from leaving a burning school without their burkas; they send them back in and of course the girls all died. That seems about as extreme as it can get.

The present Saudi government also seeks expansion by setting up and funding mosques in other countries.

How are Al Queda's Sharia and policies different from what's being done in Saudi Arabia right now?

D


5 posted on 09/29/2005 6:38:16 PM PDT by daviddennis (;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daviddennis

Sorry about the double post; I've been having some network access problems.

D


6 posted on 09/29/2005 6:38:53 PM PDT by daviddennis (;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
And if, in 2008, the American people are dumb enough--and believe me, they are fully capable of such stupidity--to elect a weak-spined, peace-at-any-price Democrat to the Presidency, Al Qaeda just might pull it off.

We certainly can't count on the Western European "powers" (please forgive my attempt at humor) to do what needs to be done.

The British military could prove a substantive obstacle but by then, their political situation may not permit decisive action.

7 posted on 09/29/2005 6:47:59 PM PDT by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

remeber, they changed it from the global war on terror. to the Global struggle against violent extremism. ok, ok, I will go hide somewhere now :p


8 posted on 09/29/2005 7:25:39 PM PDT by Kewlhand`tek (those that can't, teach. Those that can't teach, report)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: daviddennis
"How are Al Queda's Sharia and policies different from what's being done in Saudi Arabia right now?"

Gee, let's see. Um, Al Qaeda has killed 3000 Americans in New York. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia helped us defeat the Soviet Union. Al Qaeda attacked the USS Cole. Saudi Arabia provided bases for the 1990 Gulf War. Al Qaeda has sworn to destroy the United States. Saudi Arabia has been an ally for 7 decades.

Get the picture?

9 posted on 09/29/2005 7:35:40 PM PDT by trek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson