Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Expected to Name High Court Nominee (Part Deux)
ap on Yahoo ^ | 9/30/05 | Deb Riechmann - ap

Posted on 09/30/2005 11:57:49 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON - President Bush, closing in on another nomination of a new Supreme Court justice, has completed his consultations with the Senate about who should fill the seat of retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, a White House spokesman said Friday.

Bush was expected to announce his choice in the next few days. White House press secretary Scott McClellan ruled out an announcement Friday but otherwise indicated the nomination could come anytime.

The president, leaving the White House Friday afternoon for a weekend at Camp David, offered reporters only a slight grin and a shrug when asked if he had made a decision. He was returning to the White House Sunday to attend the Red Mass, a service for those in the legal profession.

On Monday, Bush will go to the Supreme Court for the investiture of John Roberts as chief justice. Roberts was confirmed by the Senate and sworn in at the White House on Thursday to succeed the late William H. Rehnquist.

McClellan said Bush and White House officials have discussed the next nomination with more than 80 of the 100 members of the Senate. He called the level of consultation unprecedented. He dismissed predictions that the next nomination would trigger a bruising confirmation fight.

"There was a lot of talk about that before," when Roberts was nominated, McClellan said. "It did not happen."

Advocacy groups on the right are expecting Bush to name a solid conservative. Liberal groups are making a late push for a moderate.

Senate Democrats say if the president submits the name of any previous judicial nominee whom they have filibustered — including federal appellate judges Priscilla Owen, Janice Rogers Brown, William Pryor and Hispanic lawyer Miguel Estrada — they will fight to the bitter end.

Bush did not offer any hints during the swearing-in ceremony for Roberts.

Roberts said the Senate's bipartisan vote for him was "confirmation of what is for me a bedrock principle — that judging is different from politics."

All of the Senate's 55 Republicans, half of the 44 Democrats and independent James Jeffords of Vermont supported him.

Roberts' confirmation came ahead of the court's new term, which begins Monday.

As for Bush's list of prospects, "it's not that long," White House press secretary Scott McClellan said.

Legal activists in contact with the White House suggest the list has been narrowed to about five or six candidates — appeals court judges and perhaps some who have never sat on the bench.

Conservatives hope Bush's nominee will shift the court to the right.

Replacing Rehnquist with Roberts is expected to keep the court's current balance. Installing a strong conservative to succeed the more moderate Justice Sandra Day O'Connor could tilt the court to the right.

"The stakes are particularly high with the replacement for O'Connor, a mainstream conservative who often provided the decisive vote to uphold many rights and protections," said Ralph Neas, president of the liberal People for the American Way.

The group urged the president on Thursday to find a consensus nominee and suggested four federal appellate judges: Ann Williams, Sonia Sotomayor, Jose Cabranes and Edward Prado.

"There are a number of distinguished judges — first appointed to the federal bench by Republican presidents — who would, like Sandra Day O'Connor, likely receive overwhelming bipartisan support to replace her," Neas said.

On the other side of the political spectrum, the Judicial Confirmation Network notes that Bush has a record of nominating individuals with conservative judicial philosophies for the appeals court. Also, despite opposition from Senate Democrats, many of Bush's conservative nominees eventually were confirmed.

"I'm hoping and expecting the president will stay on track as he has been in the past five years because it's succeeding now better than it ever has before," said Wendy Long, counsel for the group, which is backing Bush's picks. "Why in heaven's name would you reverse course?"

Mentioned most frequently in recent days are appeals court judges Owen, Karen Williams and Alice Batchelder; Michigan Supreme Court Justice Maura Corrigan; White House counsel Harriet Miers; Attorney General Alberto Gonzales; and PepsiCo lawyer Larry Thompson, who was the government's highest ranking black law enforcement official when he was deputy attorney general during Bush's first term.

Others mentioned less frequently include appeals court judges J. Michael Luttig, Edith Jones, Samuel Alito, Michael McConnell and Consuelo Callahan.

Callahan, like Gonzales, is Hispanic. There has never been a Hispanic Supreme Court justice.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bush; expected; highcourt; judicialnominees; name; nominee; partdeux; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

1 posted on 09/30/2005 11:57:50 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I wanna know today.


2 posted on 09/30/2005 11:59:46 AM PDT by johnb838 (New Tone for A-Rats: I want to hear you SCREAM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Bush should put the three slips of paper in a coffee can. One slip has Janice Rogers Brown on it. The next slip has Alex Kozinski. The final slip has Ted Olson.

Invite Harry Reid to pull a slip of paper out of the coffee can.

That's the kind of consultation I approve of.


3 posted on 09/30/2005 12:00:44 PM PDT by Uncle Joe Cannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Senate Democrats say if the president submits the name of any previous judicial nominee whom they have filibustered — including federal appellate judges Priscilla Owen, Janice Rogers Brown, William Pryor and Hispanic lawyer Miguel Estrada — they will fight to the bitter end.

---

Place your bets here... or better yet,, make a generous contribution to FR now with the soon to activated FReepathon and feeeel good! :-)

4 posted on 09/30/2005 12:01:11 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... "To remain silent when they should protest makes cowards of men." -- THOMAS JEFFERSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

soon to be


5 posted on 09/30/2005 12:01:39 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... "To remain silent when they should protest makes cowards of men." -- THOMAS JEFFERSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
OOOPS! Sorry about that slip-up about the FReepathon, Chief!

BRING IT ON!!!!

:-D

6 posted on 09/30/2005 12:03:21 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... "To remain silent when they should protest makes cowards of men." -- THOMAS JEFFERSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Dear Mr. President:

Senate Democrats are NOT in charge.

Regards,

GianniV


7 posted on 09/30/2005 12:05:07 PM PDT by GianniV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I hope he throws Janice Rogers Brown into the Senate.

It would be a huge success if he does.

1) They would try to beat her up.
2) She would survive.
3) It would make the lynching of Clarence Thomas look like a picnic..but remember, Clarence is a JUSTICE.
4) It would tear even more of the minority and women voters away from the Democratic party.


8 posted on 09/30/2005 12:05:26 PM PDT by Paloma_55 (Which part of "Common Sense" do you not understand???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"Senate Democrats say if the president submits the name of any previous judicial nominee whom they have filibustered — including federal appellate judges Priscilla Owen, Janice Rogers Brown, William Pryor and Hispanic lawyer Miguel Estrada — they will fight to the bitter end."

Works for me!

9 posted on 09/30/2005 12:05:41 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
offered reporters only a slight grin and a shrug when asked if he had made a decision.

Do we have any body language experts . . . what could this mean?!?!

10 posted on 09/30/2005 12:07:14 PM PDT by w_over_w (If I'm in business for myself . . . can I deduct money I throw into a wishing well?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnb838
You're gutsy enuf to go to war in Afghanistan and Iraq and persist, now just do it, President Bush!

Pick Janice Rogers Brown, a true constitutionalist, and let's go to war with the Left! Give no Quarter!!

11 posted on 09/30/2005 12:07:24 PM PDT by Babu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Consuelo Callahan? Irish Latino? Wouldn't want to get that judge's dander up!............


12 posted on 09/30/2005 12:08:23 PM PDT by Red Badger (In life, you don't get what you deserve. You get what you settle for...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: w_over_w

At least they didn't say "smirk"........


13 posted on 09/30/2005 12:09:05 PM PDT by Red Badger (In life, you don't get what you deserve. You get what you settle for...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Babu
Pick Janice Rogers Brown, a true constitutionalist, and let's go to war with the Left!

Pick Janice Rogers Brown, a true constitutionalist, and let's go to war with the Left!

Pick Janice Rogers Brown, a true constitutionalist, and let's go to war with the Left!

Pick Janice Rogers Brown, a true constitutionalist, and let's go to war with the Left!

Pick Janice Rogers Brown, a true constitutionalist, and let's go to war with the Left!

Pick Janice Rogers Brown, a true constitutionalist, and let's go to war with the Left!

Pick Janice Rogers Brown, a true constitutionalist, and let's go to war with the Left!

Pick Janice Rogers Brown, a true constitutionalist, and let's go to war with the Left!

Pick Janice Rogers Brown, a true constitutionalist, and let's go to war with the Left!

Pick Janice Rogers Brown, a true constitutionalist, and let's go to war with the Left!

Pick Janice Rogers Brown, a true constitutionalist, and let's go to war with the Left!

Pick Janice Rogers Brown, a true constitutionalist, and let's go to war with the Left!

Pick Janice Rogers Brown, a true constitutionalist, and let's go to war with the Left!

Pick Janice Rogers Brown, a true constitutionalist, and let's go to war with the Left!

Pick Janice Rogers Brown, a true constitutionalist, and let's go to war with the Left!

Pick Janice Rogers Brown, a true constitutionalist, and let's go to war with the Left!

Pick Janice Rogers Brown, a true constitutionalist, and let's go to war with the Left!

Pick Janice Rogers Brown, a true constitutionalist, and let's go to war with the Left!

Pick Janice Rogers Brown, a true constitutionalist, and let's go to war with the Left!

Pick Janice Rogers Brown, a true constitutionalist, and let's go to war with the Left!

Pick Janice Rogers Brown, a true constitutionalist, and let's go to war with the Left!

14 posted on 09/30/2005 12:10:23 PM PDT by Red Badger (In life, you don't get what you deserve. You get what you settle for...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The president, leaving the White House Friday afternoon for a weekend at Camp David, offered reporters only a slight grin and a shrug when asked if he had made a decision.

LOL, I love it. I bet he announces it over the weekend when the news media is "off".

15 posted on 09/30/2005 12:10:53 PM PDT by TXBubba ( Democrats: If they don't abort you then they will tax you to death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: w_over_w

"offered reporters only a slight grin and a shrug when asked if he had made a decision.
Do we have any body language experts . . . what could this mean?!?!"

It means yes and I'll announce it when I am good and ready.
(putting on my best impersonation of a body language expert)


16 posted on 09/30/2005 12:11:01 PM PDT by babaloo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Joe Cannon

I have to disagree with you. My idea of consultation is to write Janice Rogers Brown on each of three slips of paper, place them in a hat, and have anyone reach in and take one out.


17 posted on 09/30/2005 12:13:46 PM PDT by GOPologist ("On some days you may feel like a dog; on other days you may feel like a hydrant!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Babu

I agree, but will Pres. McCain approve? After all he's the one running the show in the senate.


18 posted on 09/30/2005 12:13:57 PM PDT by wmfights (lead, follow, or get out of the way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
. . . or swagger
19 posted on 09/30/2005 12:15:05 PM PDT by w_over_w (If I'm in business for myself . . . can I deduct money I throw into a wishing well?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I had heard earlier in the week the name "Raoul Cantero" being thrown around. He is a conservative Cuban-American appointed to the Florida Supreme Court by Jeb. He is only 45.

His name isn't on any popular lists anymore but he sure did sound good.


20 posted on 09/30/2005 12:15:37 PM PDT by Republican Red (''Van der Sloot" is Dutch for ''Kennedy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson