Skip to comments.
E-mail I just received from Ken Mehlman ("Harriet Miers Needs Your Help!!")
rnc.com
| Ken Mehlman
Posted on 10/03/2005 8:29:40 AM PDT by Gunder
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-113 next last
To: RockinRight
Gerbil Stuffer? Have you heard stories?Souter got "mugged" last year in the "stylish" neighborhood of DuPont Circle in D.C. where he was "jogging".
41
posted on
10/03/2005 8:58:13 AM PDT
by
NeoCaveman
(but no more kool aid)
To: Gunder
Harriet Mier's as Bush's choice for the SC is a "what 'ta hell" nomination ... it was tired, lazy choice. Others, younger and more qualified where given short shrift ... Laura Bush has been nagging George to appoint a women and he did ... one with only mediocre credentials, compared to others (not women) who would have been a better choice.
42
posted on
10/03/2005 8:58:47 AM PDT
by
BluH2o
To: craig_eddy
SCOTUS is not a political body. We should not be concerned with a particular candidates political or social leanings. Ah, so innocent, so naieve. If you believe political or social leanings don't matter, then we can do business. I have this bridge, see and...
43
posted on
10/03/2005 8:58:50 AM PDT
by
johnb838
(Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in pursuit of justice is no virtue. -- AuH2O)
To: moasicwolf
Where's the record Ken?
Try again...
To: Gunder
Got the same e-mail and replied: No, not this time. I won't support a crony from a third rate law school on blind faith.
45
posted on
10/03/2005 8:59:33 AM PDT
by
CatoRenasci
(Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
To: Tennessean4Bush
Hey Ken, my mama has donated money to Dems, volunteered for the Red Cross and Meals on Wheels. She's a devoted grandmother. I know that she's a compassionate lady. Does that make her a well-qualified candidate for SCOTUS?
To: A.Hun
47
posted on
10/03/2005 9:03:36 AM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: Gunder
Even *I* was smart enough not to vote for, nor contribute to, the Rat party in the '80's and I haven't even been to law school! Come to think of it, I haven't supported a Rat EVER.
No thanks, Mr. President. Right now I'm busy cleaning my pitchfork.
48
posted on
10/03/2005 9:04:07 AM PDT
by
Humidston
(It's Bush's fault)
To: Cedar
"committed to interpreting the law instead of legislating from the bench." I mean, he's GONNA say that, right? I don't believe him.
And the tax cuts aren't all that meaningful when he has continued to spend us into a deeper and deeper hole. I said it when Reagan was president and I'll say it again. Borrow and Borrow, spend and spend, is not a legitimate replacement for Tax and Tax, spend and spend.
And the spending in Reagans time looks tame next to what they're spending today. And we haven't had inflation since then either, so it shouldn't be that much different.
49
posted on
10/03/2005 9:04:36 AM PDT
by
johnb838
(Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in pursuit of justice is no virtue. -- AuH2O)
To: peyton randolph
Then there was Souters' "Night Out" in the park at 4:00 a.m.
50
posted on
10/03/2005 9:05:21 AM PDT
by
johnb838
(Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in pursuit of justice is no virtue. -- AuH2O)
To: dubyaismypresident
Lots of "people" of all "sexual" persuasions go "jogging" in "DuPont Circle." It is a "very" popular and tony "neighborhood" in "Washington."
If "that's" all you have to go on, then "I" don't get your "point."
51
posted on
10/03/2005 9:05:25 AM PDT
by
Piranha
To: RockinRight
There's no proof, she is going to be another Souter or even O'Connor either. In fact, she appears to be quite pro-life.
To: Maceman
6) Has not done what is necessary to win the WOT, by presenting this as some kind of War Without Sacrifice.
7) Just caved into pressure and accepted premise that Feds destroyed New Orleans, and the notion that Feds have responsibility to pay all costs of rebuilding current and future disaster areas.
53
posted on
10/03/2005 9:07:52 AM PDT
by
johnb838
(Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in pursuit of justice is no virtue. -- AuH2O)
To: johnb838
Then there was Souters' "Night Out" in the park at 4:00 a.m. At least it wasn't a public bathroom.
54
posted on
10/03/2005 9:08:59 AM PDT
by
peyton randolph
(Warning! It is illegal to fatwah a camel in all 50 states)
To: BluH2o
Plenty of women who would have been better too. Agreed. What the hell?
55
posted on
10/03/2005 9:09:18 AM PDT
by
johnb838
(Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in pursuit of justice is no virtue. -- AuH2O)
To: Gunder
I got the same email. I repsonded politely but also said if she turns out to be another Souter, or even O'Conner, I am through with the Republican party.
56
posted on
10/03/2005 9:11:27 AM PDT
by
yarddog
To: TXBSAFH
BUMP!
57
posted on
10/03/2005 9:11:30 AM PDT
by
Itzlzha
("The avalanche has already started...it is too late for the pebbles to vote")
To: Humidston
Dear Ken,
I've contributed and worked my tail off for the past six years for this moment. Can I have my money back?
MM
To: peyton randolph
I agree: give me some reason to feel comfortable that that is indeed what she'll do.
To: johnb838
I'm more of a Florida Swamp Land investor myself.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-113 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson