Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Domestic Defense
Newsweek ^ | 5 October 2005 | Michael Isikoff & Mark Hosenball

Posted on 10/05/2005 6:00:07 PM PDT by Hal1950

Could proposed new intelligence-gathering powers for the Pentagon lead to spying on U.S. citizens? The question is being asked as the White House considers new roles for the military inside America's borders.

The Pentagon would be granted new powers to conduct undercover intelligence gathering inside the United States—and then withhold any information about it from the public—under a series of little noticed provisions now winding their way through Congress.

Citing in part the need for “greater latitude” in the war on terror, the Senate Intelligence Committee recently approved broad-ranging legislation that gives the Defense Department a long sought and potentially crucial waiver: it would permit its intelligence agents, such as those working for the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), to covertly approach and cultivate “U.S. persons” and even recruit them as informants—without disclosing they are doing so on behalf of the U.S. government. The Senate committee’s action comes as President George W. Bush has talked of expanding military involvement in civil affairs, such as efforts to control pandemic disease outbreaks.

The provision was included in last year’s version of the same bill, but was knocked out after its details were reported by NEWSWEEK and critics charged it could lead to “spying” on U.S. citizens. But late last month, with no public hearings or debate, a similar amendment was put back into the same authorization bill—an annual measure governing U.S. intelligence agencies—at the request of the Pentagon. A copy of the 104-page committee bill, which has yet to be voted on by the full Senate, did not become public until last week.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: domesticspying; pentagon; secretpolice; ss

1 posted on 10/05/2005 6:00:08 PM PDT by Hal1950
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hal1950

Does it mean that the FBI is incompetent?


2 posted on 10/05/2005 6:49:22 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90; Neil E. Wright
"Does it mean that the FBI is incompetent?"

Probably too small in numbers to handle what the gummint thinks is going to be needed in the near future.

Strange that the gummint overlooked the most overwhelming force of anti-terrorist warriors in the country... our military veterans who are still under oath. A slight slip of memory, no doubt....or perhaps a deliberate slight.

3 posted on 10/05/2005 7:05:57 PM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson