Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
Posted on 10/06/2005 11:25:11 AM PDT by Tatze
New Orleans Gets a Dose of Freedom
By John Stossel
When Hurricane Katrina struck, private citizens wanted to help, but often the government got in the way. The doctors who wanted to heal people in New Orleans, but were told to fill out tax forms instead, experienced just one of many horror tales. Government seemed to have declared a monopoly on helping people -- but then its insane bureaucracy made certain it did a lousy job helping.
Now some Republicans have taken a detour from their party's rush to spend all your money by actually proposing that government help the people in the hurricane zone by getting out of the way.
President Bush wants to create a "Gulf Opportunity Zone" with reduced federal taxes across parts of three states. Now, if the president really wanted to get Washington out of the way, he might ask Congress to abolish personal and corporate income taxes there. What he's proposing is less dramatic -- but it's a start, and it's targeted to encourage investment in equipment, which is likely to be a significant cost for those starting or restarting businesses in an area where many assets have just been destroyed by a terrible storm.
Other proposals and administration decisions include waiving all Environmental Protection Agency regulations for the rebuilding, dropping affirmative-action rules for government contractors, setting aside restrictions on truck drivers' hours, and letting government money follow children displaced by the storm to any school they choose. What a radical idea! Government might actually let free people make their own choices.
Many politicians want Americans to believe that we can't do anything individually without Washington's help. But Washington can't do anything well. I'll pay you $100 if you can name one thing the government does more efficiently than the private sector.
FEMA was only established in 1979, under President Carter. What did Americans do before that? In 1871, when downtown Chicago was destroyed in a fire, private charity came to the rescue. The Chicago Aid and Relief Society coordinated assistance for a year and a half. According to the Foundation for Economic Education, the charity workers strove to avoid giving more than minimal food and clothing to those who could earn their own way. They helped restart businesses, equipping medical offices, stocking stores, and buying sewing machines. Government mainly stuck to keeping order.
Yet now, after Katrina led government to once again demonstrate its incompetence, politicians demand government rebuild New Orleans? The most remarkable thing about the president's proposal is his recognition of the obvious fact: "It is entrepreneurship that creates jobs and opportunity."
Why can't we have a little experiment? Suspend labor laws and licensing laws, reduce taxes and establish school vouchers in one small place. If it is a bad idea, as the unions and lovers of big government contend, that will be clear soon enough. I suspect they really fear success: Schools will improve, business will recover, a thousand ideas will bloom. Then everyone hemmed in by bureaucracy's suffocating rules will want Louisiana's freedom, too.
The president has already suspended the "prevailing wage law" in areas affected by Katrina. The screaming! Union bosses accused the president of pushing an "antiworker agenda" that will deny people "fair wages." Nonsense. We never needed a law to force employers to pay prevailing wages. If a wage is "prevailing," it will just happen; if it's unfair, no one will take it.
The current "prevailing wage" law requires businesses carrying out government contracts to pay a wage set, not by supply and demand, but by collusion between unions and politicians who are eager keep their constituents happy. They make sure the wage is high even for unskilled work. In real life, of course, this strangles opportunity. Employers want to get as much productivity for their dollar as the law allows, so they hire only the most experienced workers. If you are a young beginner who wants to help, and learn, "prevailing wage" laws mean you're out of luck.
With those rules suspended, an unemployed flood victim may actually get a job on a federal project. New Orleans has a long history of poverty, and Katrina made the problem worse. Fewer stupid rules would help.
It's time to give New Orleans an emergency dose of freedom.
I do too!! I've always wanted to see one area or state adopt this. Minimalize government in the lives of their citizens as much as possible and then just see how the grass gets greener. It would be a wonderful experiment..
The more articles and opines of Stossel's I read, the more I like the guy. No wonder the lib press, and media, hates him.
Great piece, Mr. Stossel, but you'll have to elect a conservative and Constitution-respecting President and Congress first.
Freedom?
Too radical.
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
Mr. Stossel won't be handing out C-notes to anyone on this bet.
There is nothing the government does more efficiently than the private sector. Period. Zero, zip, nada!
World War II was a pretty successful government program that I doubt could be achieved by the private sector.
And it (national security) is one of the FEW things our Government is actually tasked with doing, unlike the vast majority of things it is doing today.
I've never heard of this before, that's really a superb idea though. I'm going to check out that site.
On a couple of ocassions, I've heard the columnist Walter Williams comment (while guest hosting for Limbaugh) that about this type of idea, just having one state that's governed in a Libertarian way.
I'll check out the link, thanks.
The special benefits for NO are a double edged sword. Its great that they get incentives and relaxed rules, etc. But then why can't we ALL have those?
Should buusinesses move from another city to NO because of these incentives? If so, what do you tell the people in the city where the business used to reside? That their federal gvt has decided their job should go to someone else?
This is what happens when the fed gvt uses tax and regulation policy for social goals.
"There is nothing the government does more efficiently than the private sector. Period. Zero, zip, nada!"
Ok... They're better at confiscating my $ than the private sector.
Can I have my C-note now? :)
Increase it's size, revenue and market share. It is far more effective at growing itself than any private sector organization could even hope to be. Only 40 years ago, we hit the $100 Billion budget mark. Today, we are at $2,300 Billion and growing.
OK John. I want my $100.
Read the WSJ today. Those babies are standing around mad cuz the governemnt has not given them all tents and trailers to live in.
"There is nothing the government does more efficiently than the private sector. Period. Zero, zip, nada!"
Not true. The government is quite efficient at taking money from people and throwing it down ratholes. It's been doing so for decades, and keeps getting better and better at it. I've never seen a private sector organization as good at this as government is.
Free State Project? Silliness. Let's have a look at the numbers, shall we?
As of today, FSP has signed on 6786 people, of which about 380 have actually moved to NH.
The population of NH is 1,235,768.
If all the current FSP folks move there, they will make up .55% of the population of that state.
Sorry, but I fail to see where that influx is likely to have any effect whatsoever on the state of New Hampshire.
First, newcomers to a state generally are not particularly influential with the current residents. In New Hampshire, that's even more true, given the crustily independent nature of New Hampshire residents.
Second, how many Linux consultants are REALLY needed in New Hampshire?
But what prevents the same thing happening again next year?
That's the crux of the matter.
LOL! Sure enough, the government is very efficient at being inefficient with our hard-earned money.
Maybe Mr. Stossel (and I) should've qualified this further:
...name one worthwhile thing the government does more efficiently than the private sector!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.