Skip to comments.
Antonin Scalia Defends Miers
Newsmax ^
| 10/9/5
Posted on 10/09/2005 9:10:09 AM PDT by Crackingham
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 521-532 next last
Comment #221 Removed by Moderator
To: George W. Bush
Well, of course you're right; so since we can never be POSITIVE about anything, let's just leave this seat open until 2008 and let the next president fill it, okay?
222
posted on
10/09/2005 11:47:29 AM PDT
by
Howlin
To: TAdams8591
The TRUTH is EVERY PERSON KNOWN ON THAT LIST was MORE qualified.
I think you are being over the top here. Has Priscilla Owens been selected as one of the top 50 lawyers in American. If not, your statement is a lie.
To: 68 grunt
224
posted on
10/09/2005 11:49:02 AM PDT
by
Howlin
To: rwfromkansas
since Scalia's death OMG, Scalia's dead too?
To: rwfromkansas
"Roberts was a judge. He obviously is not talking about Roberts."
Yeah, I messed up bigtime on that. I do sincerely apologize. I stand corrected.
226
posted on
10/09/2005 11:49:47 AM PDT
by
jdm
To: George W. Bush
227
posted on
10/09/2005 11:49:57 AM PDT
by
Do not dub me shapka broham
("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
To: PISANO
After all he is NOT really a conservative in the mold of Thomas, now is he? I think Scalia voted against pornography.
To: jdm
No problem.
Have a good day.
229
posted on
10/09/2005 11:50:44 AM PDT
by
rwfromkansas
(http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
To: rwfromkansas
um......I mean Rehnquist's death.
cough cough
Heaven help us when Scalia goes! I hope he lives to 95.
230
posted on
10/09/2005 11:51:23 AM PDT
by
rwfromkansas
(http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
To: Mike Darancette
231
posted on
10/09/2005 11:51:43 AM PDT
by
rwfromkansas
(http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
To: TAdams8591
Oh, there are not many others who are far better qualified?
Don't know to tell you the truth. But if there were, they either could not be vetted, could not get approved, and were definitely NOT NOMINATED.
To: Mike Darancette
Knowing Bush there is virtually no chance that he will relent. So when do private Social Security accounts go into effect?
233
posted on
10/09/2005 11:52:21 AM PDT
by
Sabramerican
(Islam is to Peace as Rape is to Love)
To: pollyannaish
The other thing that they don't seem to understand is that, like a child having a temper tantrum, being left along with your own screaming is not a sign of victory...it is a sign of abandonment. I'm not going to change my mind and they are not going to change their mind...so my solution is to just wander off and wait till it's over and we can go back to rational discussion.A most excellent observation.
Some days, I wonder where all the grown ups have gone.
You haven't been here long enough to know that we go through these cycles periodically.
You should have been here the day Bush picked Cheney as his VP; it was actually worse than this.
234
posted on
10/09/2005 11:52:22 AM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Sabramerican
"Never having met her, I have no impression of her," Scalia said of the president's lawyer."
If Scalia made a comment about Miers, this is it.
It is perhaps a bit telling that Scalia, who knows every constitutational scholar and jurist that merits notice, has no knowledge of Miers.
To: jdm
... <grin>
236
posted on
10/09/2005 11:53:09 AM PDT
by
ThePythonicCow
(To err is human; to moo is bovine.)
To: Mike Darancette
I have an even better question.
Has there ever been a nominee for a seat on the Supreme Court whose views were so indecipherable, in combination with such a paucity of public records by which to judge her suitability for this position?
237
posted on
10/09/2005 11:53:20 AM PDT
by
Do not dub me shapka broham
("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
To: jdm
It's not condescending at all; it's a fact; she has grown and it sounds like you're still demanding something from the 1950's.
When will you all ever understand that we aren't a party in a glass bowl; we have to work with OTHERS.
238
posted on
10/09/2005 11:53:35 AM PDT
by
Howlin
To: jdm
**Debating, disagreement shouldn't be reduced to such nastiness, disrespect.**
Well, look who's talking. I don't think I've ever seen such nastiness and disrespect from someone who claims to dislike both.
239
posted on
10/09/2005 11:53:56 AM PDT
by
ilovew
(Never insult my role model. I LOVE KARL ROVE!)
To: counterpunch
Wrong and you are helping to make it wrong. Here's how it will go:
Democrats will demand all the documents Miers handled in her 5 years in the White House.
Bush will refuse.
Democrats will vote FOR HER because the Conservatives oppose her.
A handful of dissatisfied Republicans will waste their votes and Miers will be approved.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 521-532 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson