Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Antonin Scalia Defends Miers
Newsmax ^ | 10/9/5

Posted on 10/09/2005 9:10:09 AM PDT by Crackingham

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 521-532 next last
Comment #221 Removed by Moderator

To: George W. Bush

Well, of course you're right; so since we can never be POSITIVE about anything, let's just leave this seat open until 2008 and let the next president fill it, okay?


222 posted on 10/09/2005 11:47:29 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591

The TRUTH is EVERY PERSON KNOWN ON THAT LIST was MORE qualified.

I think you are being over the top here. Has Priscilla Owens been selected as one of the top 50 lawyers in American. If not, your statement is a lie.


223 posted on 10/09/2005 11:48:52 AM PDT by BushisTheMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt

You're right about that.


224 posted on 10/09/2005 11:49:02 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
since Scalia's death

OMG, Scalia's dead too?

225 posted on 10/09/2005 11:49:25 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
"Roberts was a judge. He obviously is not talking about Roberts."

Yeah, I messed up bigtime on that. I do sincerely apologize. I stand corrected.
226 posted on 10/09/2005 11:49:47 AM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
Bush-hater!

(Sarcasm)

:0)

227 posted on 10/09/2005 11:49:57 AM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: PISANO
After all he is NOT really a conservative in the mold of Thomas, now is he?

I think Scalia voted against pornography.

228 posted on 10/09/2005 11:50:29 AM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jdm

No problem.

Have a good day.


229 posted on 10/09/2005 11:50:44 AM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

um......I mean Rehnquist's death.

cough cough

Heaven help us when Scalia goes! I hope he lives to 95.


230 posted on 10/09/2005 11:51:23 AM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

oops


231 posted on 10/09/2005 11:51:43 AM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591

Oh, there are not many others who are far better qualified?

Don't know to tell you the truth. But if there were, they either could not be vetted, could not get approved, and were definitely NOT NOMINATED.


232 posted on 10/09/2005 11:51:57 AM PDT by BushisTheMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
Knowing Bush there is virtually no chance that he will relent.

So when do private Social Security accounts go into effect?

233 posted on 10/09/2005 11:52:21 AM PDT by Sabramerican (Islam is to Peace as Rape is to Love)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: pollyannaish
The other thing that they don't seem to understand is that, like a child having a temper tantrum, being left along with your own screaming is not a sign of victory...it is a sign of abandonment. I'm not going to change my mind and they are not going to change their mind...so my solution is to just wander off and wait till it's over and we can go back to rational discussion.

A most excellent observation.

Some days, I wonder where all the grown ups have gone.

You haven't been here long enough to know that we go through these cycles periodically.

You should have been here the day Bush picked Cheney as his VP; it was actually worse than this.

234 posted on 10/09/2005 11:52:22 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Sabramerican
"Never having met her, I have no impression of her," Scalia said of the president's lawyer."

If Scalia made a comment about Miers, this is it.

It is perhaps a bit telling that Scalia, who knows every constitutational scholar and jurist that merits notice, has no knowledge of Miers.
235 posted on 10/09/2005 11:52:26 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: jdm
... <grin>
236 posted on 10/09/2005 11:53:09 AM PDT by ThePythonicCow (To err is human; to moo is bovine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
I have an even better question.

Has there ever been a nominee for a seat on the Supreme Court whose views were so indecipherable, in combination with such a paucity of public records by which to judge her suitability for this position?

237 posted on 10/09/2005 11:53:20 AM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: jdm

It's not condescending at all; it's a fact; she has grown and it sounds like you're still demanding something from the 1950's.

When will you all ever understand that we aren't a party in a glass bowl; we have to work with OTHERS.


238 posted on 10/09/2005 11:53:35 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: jdm

**Debating, disagreement shouldn't be reduced to such nastiness, disrespect.**

Well, look who's talking. I don't think I've ever seen such nastiness and disrespect from someone who claims to dislike both.


239 posted on 10/09/2005 11:53:56 AM PDT by ilovew (Never insult my role model. I LOVE KARL ROVE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

Wrong and you are helping to make it wrong. Here's how it will go:

Democrats will demand all the documents Miers handled in her 5 years in the White House.
Bush will refuse.
Democrats will vote FOR HER because the Conservatives oppose her.
A handful of dissatisfied Republicans will waste their votes and Miers will be approved.


240 posted on 10/09/2005 11:54:14 AM PDT by BushisTheMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 521-532 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson