Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What is your Worldview? (Secular Humanism and Education)
The Illinois Leader ^ | 10/5/05 | Joyce Morrison

Posted on 10/09/2005 11:42:04 AM PDT by wagglebee

Following a week-end attending a Worldview Conference, I came home with my mind full of the many directions we have taken since we first became a sovereign nation based on Godly principles.

It is very easy to see the forces coming against our nation and many of them are coming from within...and we have given them our permission.

If other worldviews are to flourish, it is imperative that the Christian Heritage of our nation be destroyed. I brought home numerous books and pieces of information and as I read through them, it is not difficult to see how Christianity has been removed from our nation, beginning in the classroom.

I purchased The New-England Primer, which has been reprinted by David Barton’s Wallbuilders organization. It was the primer used in Boston schools in 1777.

Brilliant drawings and illustrations were used as part of the teaching of the alphabet:

A. In Adam’s Fall; We sinned all

B. Heaven to find; The Bible Mind.

C. Christ crucify’d; For sinners dy’d.

D. The Deluge drown’d; The Earth around.

E. Elijah hid; By Ravens fed.

F. The judgment made; Felix afraid.

In the book, A Lesson for Children, we find:

Pray to God.
Love God.
Fear God.
Take not God’s name in vain
Cheat not in your play
Play not with bad boys
Love your School
Speak the Truth
Be not a Dunce

The whole primer is made up of lessons for life and “The Assembly of Divines.” Their teachings were based on the Bible.

We expect our children to really know about God and His truth by sending them to church one or two hours a week and a big part of that time is “entertainment.” We send them to schools funded by citizens’ tax dollars, but they are under the control of the NEA and ACLU. Schools where they are told God can not be mentioned and prayer must be evil because it is forbidden.

We then wonder why our nation has been dumbed down with no respect for our sovereign God, the Constitution, our Founding Fathers, the Declaration of Independence or the Bill of Rights. We find our history books have been distorted. Much of the curriculum is long on fiction and short on truth.

Secular Humanism is a worldview religion with its own Manifesto. It has had a stronghold on the minds of our youth for decades. The following comes from A Humanist Manifesto (1933):

The time has come for widespread recognition of the radical change in religious beliefs throughout the modern world. The time is past for mere revision of traditional attitudes. Science and economic change have disrupted the old beliefs. Religions the world over are under the necessity of coming to terms with new conditions created by a vastly increased knowledge and experience. In every field of human activity, the vital movement is now in the direction of a candid and explicitly humanism. In order that religious humanism may be better understood we, the undersigned, desire to make certain affirmations which we believe the facts of our contemporary life demonstrate.

There is great danger of a final, and we believe fatal, identification of the word religion with doctrines and methods which have lost their significance and which are powerless to solve the problem of humans living in the Twentieth Century.

Although Humanists will deny it is a religion, there can be no doubt that Secular Humanism IS a religion, just as surely as Christianity. What most don’t realize, as Christianity was being removed from the schools, new religions were being introduced. Dr. David Noebel, author of many books on worldviews, reveals in his book Clergy in the Classroom page after page of documentation proving Secular Humanism is a religion - and by their own admission.

Environmentalism is a religion in the form of creature and earth worship above the Creator. We are subjecting our children to many religions, but the one true religion missing is Christianity, the foundation of our sovereign United States.

As we wonder why things are happening and we just can’t understand, we must realize our churches are benign in many areas. There are so few churches preaching the truth and, therefore, they are certainly no threat to what has invaded our nation. Many churches are into teaching more secular humanism than the gospel of Jesus Christ. Many of our youth groups are no more than peer groups led by well meaning, but unqualified leaders.

Kids today have difficulty making moral decisions. Statistics sadly show little difference between divorce rates and other problems in the family among church-goers from the rest of the world. This should not be a surprise, as we have willingly handed over our most valuable investments -- our children -- to un-Christian curriculums, computers and television for training, and sometimes even a major portion of their upbringing.

“Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it.” Proverbs 22:6

Maybe we would see a change in our nation if we went back to the New England Primer and children were taught from early childhood:

If GOD hath given you increase,
And blessed well your store,
Remember you are put in trust
And should relieve the poor.
Beware of foul and filthy lust,
Let such things have no place,
Keep clean your vessels in the LORD
That He may you embrace.
Ye are the temples of the LORD
For you are dearly bought
And they that do defile the same
Shall surely come to nought.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: christianity; christianworldview; education; leftists; secularhumanism; worldview
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-69 next last
Although Humanists will deny it is a religion, there can be no doubt that Secular Humanism IS a religion, just as surely as Christianity. What most don’t realize, as Christianity was being removed from the schools, new religions were being introduced. Dr. David Noebel, author of many books on worldviews, reveals in his book Clergy in the Classroom page after page of documentation proving Secular Humanism is a religion - and by their own admission.

I believe that secular humanism in all of its various forms (socialism, enviornmentalism, eugenics, the culture of death) is tearing apart our society.

1 posted on 10/09/2005 11:42:09 AM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah; DirtyHarryY2K; Coleus; NYer; Salvation

Secular humanism ping.


2 posted on 10/09/2005 11:43:36 AM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!


3 posted on 10/09/2005 12:01:00 PM PDT by balrog666 (A myth by any other name is still inane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: balrog666

He forgot to mention flouridation and other attempts to impurify our precious bodily fluids.


4 posted on 10/09/2005 12:18:35 PM PDT by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Well, unless one pines for talaboon madrassa, one better consider that the high tech future requires workforce at least the most creative part of which would have to come from secularist education. When coming down with appendicitis, one seeks surgeons, not faith healers.
5 posted on 10/09/2005 12:22:43 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; ...
Agenda 21
Study Shows Secularist Public Schools Indoctrinate Even Christian Kids
The Inevitable Result of Secular Humanism
 
1933
A Humanist Manifesto is published with 34 prominent signatories at the time
http://www.priestsforlife.org/prochoice/humanistmanifesto.htm

6 posted on 10/09/2005 12:24:07 PM PDT by Coleus (Harriet E. Miers was born Roman Catholic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: balrog666

Recommended reading: Psychology as Religion: The Cult of Self-Worship by Paul Vitz ISBN 0802807259
I dont mind people that are "open minded"...just those that are so open-minded that they are closed minded about it.. The type that declare the right to free expression as long it is THEIR free expression, and who insist that the government has full authority to stifle speech to the contrary as "hate-speech."


7 posted on 10/09/2005 12:30:20 PM PDT by CThomasFan (GWB 04...living proof that God is still blessing America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: balrog666

Why is this funny? I agree with everything in this article, except that the absence of the Flying Spaghetti Monster in people's lives, rather than Jesus, is the cause. For only through the graces of His noodly appendages shall one find solace in their life.

Ramen


8 posted on 10/09/2005 12:49:16 PM PDT by JasonSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

bump to your post.


9 posted on 10/09/2005 1:03:20 PM PDT by Maeve (Remember Lepanto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NYer; ELS; saradippity; american colleen; sandyeggo
I have been told that my worldview is "Joan of Arc" meets medieval Catholic crusader. Do you think the chain-maille mantillas give me and the other women in my family away?
10 posted on 10/09/2005 1:09:24 PM PDT by Maeve (Remember Lepanto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

There is far too much evidence for strictly belief. One must conclude that secular humanism is extremely detrimental to humans. One might conclude it is deadly. At any rate, it serves mankind better by its absence.

Any philosophy that elevates immediate self indulgence over long term well being of one and one's kindred cannot even begin to be considered as a substitute for Christianity. Well, not unless you are considering suicide for yourself and elimination of the whole human race.


11 posted on 10/09/2005 1:28:49 PM PDT by MarkBSenior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
"When coming down with appendicitis, one seeks surgeons, not faith healers."

When I was a child we had both. When you got sick you went to the doctor. On returning home the elders were called to anoint you with oil and pray for you healing. If you did not get better you had a lousy doctor. If you did recover it proved the power of God. Kind of the best of both worlds.
12 posted on 10/09/2005 1:34:37 PM PDT by Parawan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Parawan

Your message reminded me of somebody's words: "God heals and doctor takes the fee". However, not having any use for elders and the like, I would stick with the doctor, on purely selfish grounds.


13 posted on 10/09/2005 1:48:05 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I believe that secular humanism in all of its various forms (socialism, enviornmentalism, eugenics, the culture of death) is tearing apart our society.

Yes....the Founders not only thought so as well, they based our country on it-

of them, who have perverted them for the structure of a system of fancy absolutely incomprehensible, and without any foundation in his genuine words. And the day will come when the mystical generation of Jesus, by the supreme being as his father in the womb of a virgin will be classed with the fable of the generation of Minerva in the brain of Jupiter. But we may hope that the dawn of reason and freedom of thought in these United States will do away with all this artificial scaffolding, and restore to us the primitive and genuine doctrines of this the most venerated reformer of human errors."
Thomas Jefferson, in a letter to John Adams, April 11, 1823

___________

Noah Webster, the man personally responsible for Art. I, Sec. 8, ¶ 8, of the U. S. Constitution, explained two centuries ago:
The duties of men are summarily comprised in the Ten Commandments, consisting of two tables; one comprehending the duties which we owe immediately to God- the other, the duties we owe to our fellow men.

14 posted on 10/09/2005 1:50:18 PM PDT by MamaTexan (~ I am NOT a 'legal entity'....... nor am I a 'person' as created by law ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan
It's quite ironic, because it is popularly taught today that Jefferson was a deist who did not believe in the divinity of Christ, the Virgin Birth or the Resurrection.

And then there are those who subscribe to the notion that because the Founding Fathers did not specifically cite Judeo-Christian doctrine as a basis for the Constitution, they must not have wanted it, when the truth is that these principles were so intrinsic to their beliefs that they thought any specific reference unnecessary.

15 posted on 10/09/2005 1:59:38 PM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MarkBSenior
There is far too much evidence for strictly belief. One must conclude that secular humanism is extremely detrimental to humans. One might conclude it is deadly. At any rate, it serves mankind better by its absence.

Awwww, it's just too bad it's not going away any time soon, isn't it?

16 posted on 10/09/2005 2:14:20 PM PDT by balrog666 (A myth by any other name is still inane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
when the truth is that these principles were so intrinsic to their beliefs that they thought any specific reference unnecessary.

Exactly!

Another great misconception is that the Christianity mentioned by the Founders couldn't have anything to do with government because of the 'septation of church and state' clause.

Few people seem to understand that the Christian religion is what PROTECTS the people from government....it doesn't even mean you have to BE Christian, you only have to follow Natural Law!

17 posted on 10/09/2005 3:09:31 PM PDT by MamaTexan (~ I am NOT a 'legal entity'....... nor am I a 'person' as created by law ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan
septation = separation
18 posted on 10/09/2005 3:12:01 PM PDT by MamaTexan (~ I am NOT a 'legal entity'....... nor am I a 'person' as created by law ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MarkBSenior
There is far too much evidence for strictly belief. One must conclude that secular humanism is extremely detrimental to humans. One might conclude it is deadly. At any rate, it serves mankind better by its absence. Any philosophy that elevates immediate self indulgence over long term well being of one and one's kindred cannot even begin to be considered as a substitute for Christianity.

True enough, but you're simplistically mistaking the lack of religion for hedonism. I don't know of a single atheist or "humanist" who actually behaves that way or bases a worldview on "immediate self indulgence".

Don't mistake your prejudices for reality.

19 posted on 10/09/2005 3:16:17 PM PDT by Ichneumon (Certified pedantic coxcomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I believe that secular humanism in all of its various forms (socialism, enviornmentalism, eugenics, the culture of death) is tearing apart our society.

"Enviornmentalism [sic]" is a form of "secular humanism"? Ooookay...

20 posted on 10/09/2005 3:17:53 PM PDT by Ichneumon (Certified pedantic coxcomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: balrog666

Yes.

Unless you are culturally suicidally inclined. Then I imagine it would be most welcome.

The culture that replaces ours will have a strong ethical code and a consistent moral base. It's the only way to have a strong one and ours is weakening.

Perhaps the Latinos might supply a moral backbone. Lord knows that few American institutions have one. They are a possible hope.

Else we might consider Mandarin Chinese as a first language. After the navel gazers and self indulgent here have sapped the nation's very will to survive.

The Roman Republic could be described by the mothers' exhortations to their soldier sons: Come back with your shield, or on it.

Compare that to Mother Moonbat Sheehan's words.


21 posted on 10/09/2005 3:20:34 PM PDT by MarkBSenior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon

Secular humanism IS self worship. However it is practised, it is based upon the idea that the individual human is the center of his universe and that there is no other force or entity that matters more.

Whatever the secular humanist decides at the moment is right and good. It is based upon a subjective notion of right and wrong. An internal set of criteria that is influenced by one's moods, feelings and whims. Whereas Christianity is based upon an objective, external set of criteria which does not waver.

The secular humanist's behaviour is strictly based upon the decision of the moment and is therefore unsuitable to base not only societal rules upon it, but personal ones as well.


22 posted on 10/09/2005 3:28:03 PM PDT by MarkBSenior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon

In retrospect, I erred in not adding Darwinists/evolutionists to the list.


23 posted on 10/09/2005 3:30:37 PM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Thanks - I'll read/ping later.


24 posted on 10/09/2005 3:58:36 PM PDT by little jeremiah (A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GSlob; GatorGirl; maryz; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; livius; goldenstategirl; ...
GSlob says:
"Well, unless one pines for talaboon madrassa, one better consider that the high tech future requires workforce at least the most creative part of which would have to come from secularist education. When coming down with appendicitis, one seeks surgeons, not faith healers."

Say GSlob, have you no regards for CATHOLIC education? More than one WORLD CLASS scientist comes from that venue. Can you admit that?

25 posted on 10/09/2005 4:06:54 PM PDT by narses (St Thomas says “lex injusta non obligat”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Coleus; GatorGirl; maryz; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; livius; goldenstategirl; ...

+


26 posted on 10/09/2005 4:09:34 PM PDT by narses (St Thomas says “lex injusta non obligat”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Darwinists/evolutionists

That's funny, because evolutionists accept that humans evolved from "lower" apes, and a few people take that to mean apes and humans are on the same "level". How is this humanist?

Even the creationists typically use that as an attack against evolution ("WHAT?? I didn't come from a dirty, stinky monkey!").

27 posted on 10/09/2005 4:15:14 PM PDT by JasonSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

The more I have studied Scripture, different denominations of Christianity, comparative religions, and the history of the Separation of Church and State, the more convinced I am that the intent of our founding fathers was to insure the differences between Christian denominations was their meaning in regards to the state not establishing nor disallowing any particular religion.

The deeper one studies the Word of God and observes fellow believers with their respective unique spiritual gifts and logistical grace provided to each of us uniquely by Him, the more apparant it becomes that other 'counterfeit religions' merely promote an inherantly system of false spirituality that will conflict with legitimate authority in private property, individual rights, marriage, family and government.

One aspect of authority which the angels might not ever observe in man until the second coming is a nation which has our Constitution, but recognizes God through faith in Christ.


28 posted on 10/09/2005 4:18:40 PM PDT by Cvengr (<;^))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkBSenior

Your proud ignorance of ethos matches your ignorance of history. Look up "Sparta" some time.


29 posted on 10/09/2005 4:22:09 PM PDT by balrog666 (A myth by any other name is still inane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Secular humanism is the direct result of a country full of gutless pastors who grovel at the altar of the IRS's 501C-3 tax exempt status. By making the proverbial deal with the devil our country's churches have forfeited their sovereignty to the fedgov and we're left with a bunch of blowdried, limpwristed impostors who "don't want to offend anybody".


30 posted on 10/09/2005 4:48:46 PM PDT by american spirit (Can you handle the truth? - www.rbnlive.com ( 4-6 CST M-F)) / click "listen live")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

SPOTREP


31 posted on 10/09/2005 5:13:54 PM PDT by LiteKeeper (Another retired Army Chaplain - and also proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
In retrospect, I erred in not adding Darwinists/evolutionists to the list.

No you didn't.

32 posted on 10/09/2005 5:17:30 PM PDT by Ichneumon (Certified pedantic coxcomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MarkBSenior
Secular humanism IS self worship.

Wrong.

However it is practised, it is based upon the idea that the individual human is the center of his universe and that there is no other force or entity that matters more.

Nope.

Whatever the secular humanist decides at the moment is right and good.

Wrong again.

It is based upon a subjective notion of right and wrong. An internal set of criteria that is influenced by one's moods, feelings and whims.

Ditto for which religion a person chooses to follow, how strongly they follow its tenets, which ones are given more import, etc. Religious beliefs, views, observation, practice, and adherence are as subjective as any other.

Whereas Christianity is based upon an objective, external set of criteria which does not waver.

Ah, yes, that must be why there's only one, single, unified branch of Christianity. Oops!

African Methodist Episcopal
African Methodist Episcopal Zion
African Orthodox Church
American Baptist Churches USA
Amish
Anabaptist
Anglican Catholic Church
Antiochian Orthodox
Armenian Evangelical Church
Armenian Orthodox
Assemblies of God
Associated Gospel Churches of Canada
Association of Vineyard Churches
Baptist
Baptist Bible Fellowship
Branch Davidian
Brethren in Christ
Bruderhof Communities
Byzantine Catholic Church
Calvary Chapel
Calvinist
Catholic
Cell Church
Celtic Orthodox
Charismatic Episcopal Church
Children of God
Christadelphian
Christian and Missionary Alliance
Christian Churches of God
Christian Identity
Christian Reformed Church
Christian Science
Church of God
Church of God
Church of God
Church of God in Christ
Church of God of Prophecy
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Church of Scotland
Church of South India
Church of the Brethren
Church of the Lutheran Brethren of America
Church of the Nazarene
Church of the New Jerusalem
Church of the United Brethren in Christ
Church Universal and Triumphant
Churches of Christ
Churches of God General Conference
Congregational Christian Churches
Coptic Orthodox
Cumberland Presbyterian Church
Disciples of Christ
Episcopal
Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church
Evangelical Congregational Church
Evangelical Covenant Church
Evangelical Formosan Church
Evangelical Free Church
Evangelical Lutheran Church
Evangelical Methodist Church
Evangelical Presbyterian
Fellowship of Christian Assemblies
Fellowship of Grace Brethren
Fellowship of Independent Evangelical Churches
Free Church of Scotland
Free Methodist
Free Presbyterian
Free Will Baptist
Gnostic
Great Commission Association of Churches
Greek Orthodox
Hutterian Brethren
Independent Fundamental Churches of America
Indian Orthodox
International Church of the Foursquare Gospel
International Churches of Christ
Jehovah's Witnesses
Living Church of God
Local Church
Lutheran
Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod
Mar Thoma Syrian Church
Mennonite
Messianic Judaism
Methodist
Moravian Church
Nation of Yahweh
New Frontiers International
Old Catholic Church
Orthodox
Orthodox Church in America
Orthodox Presbyterian
Pentecostal
Plymouth Brethren
Presbyterian
Presbyterian Church
Presbyterian Church in America
Primitive Baptist
Protestant Reformed Church
Reformed
Reformed Baptist
Reformed Church in America
Reformed Church in the United States
Reformed Churches of Australia
Reformed Episcopal
Reformed Presbyterian Church
Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
Revival Centres International
Romanian Orthodox
Rosicrucian
Russian Orthodox
Serbian Orthodox
Seventh Day Baptist
Seventh-Day Adventist
Shaker
Society of Friends
Southern Baptist Convention
Spiritist
Syrian Orthodox
True and Living Church of Jesus Christ of Saints of the Last Days
Two-by-Twos
Unification Church
Unitarian-Universalism
United Church of Canada
United Church of Christ
United Church of God
United Free Church of Scotland
United Methodist Church
United Reformed Church
Uniting Church in Australia
Unity Church
Unity Fellowship Church
Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches
Virtual Churches
Waldensian Church
Way International, The
Web Directories
Wesleyan
Wesleyan Methodist
Worldwide Church of God

The secular humanist's behaviour is strictly based upon the decision of the moment

Wrong again. Very wrong.

and is therefore unsuitable to base not only societal rules upon it, but personal ones as well.

Maybe if your premises were correct, but since they aren't, your conclusion is fallacious.

33 posted on 10/09/2005 5:35:06 PM PDT by Ichneumon (Certified pedantic coxcomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: narses

In my field [chemistry] Nobel prize winners [and other top class scientists] that I know of are secular - if any one of them did attend religious school, they left this part of their education safely behind. There might be exceptions, but I suspect not many. I am not familiar with other fields, but I would be willing to make a bet on similar picture.


34 posted on 10/09/2005 7:14:17 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon

The logic there is fellatious, not "fallacious".


35 posted on 10/09/2005 7:27:27 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: GSlob; GatorGirl; maryz; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; livius; goldenstategirl; ...
See Giulio Natta – Biography and D. Carleton Gajdusek – Autobiography for just a couple of Nobel laureates influenced or educated by religous institutions. More, the idea that SCIENCE and the CATHOLIC worldview are opposed to each other is a simple falsehood. Absent the Church, in particular the Irish monastical culture, science in Europe might never have debveloped. Your particular bigotry is showing with your odd worldviews. I hope you can get over that blindness.
36 posted on 10/09/2005 7:42:36 PM PDT by narses (St Thomas says “lex injusta non obligat”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

"When coming down with appendicitis, one seeks surgeons, not faith healers."

I rather like my church's take on such things. Go for the faith healers (actually, prayers and blessings by the elders), but also for the surgeons. Pray for guidance for the surgeon's hands, as he performs his art, while you're at it. Makes good sense to me, anyway.

As for secular humanism, it's ok in small doses. There are aspects of it I really do like, and quite a few I'm not so happy about.


37 posted on 10/09/2005 7:43:05 PM PDT by Old Student (WRM, MSgt, USAF(Ret.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Whatever its faults, secular humanism didn't fly jetliners into the World Trade Center. Nor are any of its adherents likely to ever do so.


38 posted on 10/09/2005 7:45:58 PM PDT by Mr. Jeeves (Speaking several languages is an asset; keeping your mouth shut in one is priceless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narses

I'd rather model myself after the late R. B. Woodward, but the ability is not there. And as for my "particular bigotry" - not a cent!


39 posted on 10/09/2005 7:57:52 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
we first became a sovereign nation based on Godly principles.

Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness are more secular humanist than godly.

40 posted on 10/09/2005 8:50:32 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Paging Nehemiah Scudder:the Crazy Years are peaking. America is ready for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; MamaTexan
It's quite ironic, because it is popularly taught today that Jefferson was a deist who did not believe in the divinity of Christ, the Virgin Birth or the Resurrection.

From the extract MamaTexan quoted, he didn't.

41 posted on 10/09/2005 8:57:56 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Paging Nehemiah Scudder:the Crazy Years are peaking. America is ready for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

You are quite clueless. Check my profile page and get up to speed.


42 posted on 10/09/2005 8:59:11 PM PDT by Matchett-PI ( "History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid." -- Dwight Eisenhower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: thompsonsjkc; odoso; animoveritas; mercygrace; Laissez-faire capitalist; bellevuesbest; ...

Moral Absolutes Ping.

It's noteworthy how much lately I have read articles on FR, comments on FR, and even comments from a friend* - stating that "religion" is the worst thing in the world, that all evil comes from religions fanatics [meaning anyone who actually believes in God], that religious people have no business using their belief in God to inform any decision that affects public policy [the death penalty overturned because some of the jurors had consulted the Bible], that religion belongs in the cupboard [Rushdie], that religious belief in God is primitive superstition [evo threads], that societies where most citizens have strong religious belifes are the most deadly and dangerous, and the like.

Then consider the ACLU and how its insect like members are busily trying to remove every single vestige of religion from any public place. Although whether they are trying to remove Muslim symbols and the like I haven't heard.

It's more than just Christianity, it's God Himself they want to excise from the world. Their rebellion against God - motivated by their desire to be the Supreme - has caused them to go insane, and they are dragging everyone along with them.

First, we need to recognize that this is happening.

Second, we need to figure out what we're going to do about it.

Freepmail me if you want on/off this pinglist.

*Retelling a conversation with a relative.


43 posted on 10/10/2005 12:41:10 AM PDT by little jeremiah (A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkBSenior
The Roman Republic could be described by the mothers' exhortations to their soldier sons: Come back with your shield, or on it.

Um... attributed rather to Spartan mothers, I believe, in Plutarch's Moralia. But yes, a most admirable sentiment.

44 posted on 10/10/2005 1:05:50 AM PDT by John Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
Whatever its faults, secular humanism didn't fly jetliners into the World Trade Center. Nor are any of its adherents likely to ever do so.

No, but they have stood by silently and in many instances participated while 40 million+ babies have been slaughtered in abortion mills over the past three decades.

45 posted on 10/10/2005 5:06:48 AM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: narses

Thanks for the ping Narses!


46 posted on 10/10/2005 8:50:49 AM PDT by sneakers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
No, but they have stood by silently and in many instances participated while 40 million+ babies have been slaughtered in abortion mills over the past three decades.

So have 99.99% of Christians.

47 posted on 10/10/2005 8:56:24 AM PDT by balrog666 (A myth by any other name is still inane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
When coming down with appendicitis, one seeks surgeons, not faith healers.

Well, that's one example. Problems arise however when you go to an obstretician/gynecologist and they recommend abortion to someone who views it as murder. Or you vote for a politician who believes that there is nothing wrong with infanticide. Or you have a mechanic that doesn't think that there's anything wrong with overcharging you.

Without a Christian-centered ethos as a cultural lodestar, everyone can indulge in whatever is good for himself.

48 posted on 10/10/2005 9:38:25 AM PDT by TradicalRC (Benedicamus Domino.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TradicalRC
"Without a Christian-centered ethos as a cultural lodestar, everyone can indulge in whatever is good for himself"
They have always done so, and there's nothing intrinsically bad in it: that's how the "invisible hand" works, among other things. Remember: "greed is good". And with ob/gyn: nowadays a patient always has to sign on the dotted line - consent form, even for a tooth removal. So whoso does not like the doctor's recommendation, does not sign on the dotted line. Case closed.
49 posted on 10/10/2005 9:59:32 AM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
And with ob/gyn: nowadays a patient always has to sign on the dotted line - consent form, even for a tooth removal. So whoso does not like the doctor's recommendation, does not sign on the dotted line. Case closed.

Uh, case NOT closed. Many states allow teenage girls to procur an abortion without parental consent. While ANY other form of surgery would.

...everyone can indulge in whatever is good for himself"

They have always done so, and there's nothing intrinsically bad in it: that's how the "invisible hand" works, among other things. Remember: "greed is good".

There is nothing intrinsically good in it either. Apparently the Holland model works for you, it sure doesn't for me. And when Gas hits $10.oo a gallon keep repeating your greed is good mantra. The bottom line mentality that views persons as commodities is definitely intrinsically bad.

50 posted on 10/11/2005 6:11:59 AM PDT by TradicalRC (Benedicamus Domino.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson