Skip to comments.
Miers unlikely to 'evolve'
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review ^
| 10/10/5
| Marvin and Peter Olasky
Posted on 10/10/2005 12:33:51 PM PDT by Crackingham
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 last
To: Betaille
Stop falling back on her church, it's a really discredited tactic. Merely an observation, you don't like? Too bad.
But while we are critiquing the debate why don't you stop lying. Truth tends to elevate the debate.
81
posted on
10/10/2005 6:14:00 PM PDT
by
jwalsh07
To: Do not dub me shapka broham; flashbunny
Post #59. You didn't do it, unShapka. In subsequent posts, there really wasn't any need to ping the Freeper in question, as she's already been pinged to the thread. It's that initial post...stealth snottiness. Cowardly, lazy or snotty, I don't care which, it is all disgusting behavior. As I said, I've been seeing it a lot lately...it is the kind of behavior that rears its ugly head whenever there is a major disagreement on the board, and it's not as if the Miers tap is the first disagreement of that nature.
You know what's even stupider? Read the whole thread...there are maybe three or four posts of actual discussion and another 75 variations of "Well you're just a Bush-bashing liberal!" or "Oh yeah, well you're a koolaid drinking Bushbot, you are!" It's so pathetic. Thank God I am realizing just how pathetic, because now I am laughing about it instead of letting it get to me.
FWIW, I do not like the choice of Miers, and not because of anything that the calorically-challenged Ann Coulter has said. I worked my ass off as a precinct chair for the President's reelection because I knew SCOTUS was up for grabs. I fully expected a Scalia/Thomas. Miers isn't just in a different ballpark; she's playing a different sport. And this is no time for games, anyway.
82
posted on
10/10/2005 6:28:05 PM PDT
by
grellis
(Coming in September 2006! SURVIVOR: MORDOR)
To: Itzlzha
83
posted on
10/10/2005 6:29:45 PM PDT
by
Cyber Liberty
(© 2005, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
To: Itzlzha
What's up with that, anyway?
84
posted on
10/10/2005 6:43:47 PM PDT
by
Cyber Liberty
(© 2005, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
To: grellis
You're right about that.
It's a very disappointing choice.
:(
85
posted on
10/10/2005 6:55:56 PM PDT
by
Do not dub me shapka broham
("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
To: Cicero
No kidding. What this appointment says is, "NEVER issue a conservative judgment, because it will forever outlaw you from being promoted to a higher court."And don't even get a subscription to National Review in your own name. Either buy it on the street or put the subscription in your siblings name.
86
posted on
10/10/2005 6:59:52 PM PDT
by
NeoCaveman
(you call me a right wing extremist like it's a bad thing.....)
To: Cyber Liberty
87
posted on
10/10/2005 7:23:27 PM PDT
by
TSchmereL
("Trust but verify.")
To: TSchmereL
It's a vulgar reference....
88
posted on
10/10/2005 7:28:27 PM PDT
by
Cyber Liberty
(© 2005, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
To: Cyber Liberty
Oh, shit. I had it on my clipboard and I used it as a bump. What the hell does it mean?
89
posted on
10/10/2005 7:34:05 PM PDT
by
TSchmereL
("Trust but verify.")
To: TSchmereL
90
posted on
10/10/2005 7:42:06 PM PDT
by
Cyber Liberty
(© 2005, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
To: Crackingham
She may be unlikely to 'evolve', but as Maxine Watersa (I think it was) would observe, she may just turn 360 degrees, you'll see!
91
posted on
10/10/2005 7:44:07 PM PDT
by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
To: AxelPaulsenJr
Luttig, Brown, Owen, Alito, Wilkenson, McConnell, Gaza, Brown, et. al.
92
posted on
10/10/2005 7:58:43 PM PDT
by
RKB-AFG
(60 seats in '06)
To: Cboldt
Thanks for the hyper link, but I believe I can scroll back to the post.
93
posted on
10/11/2005 6:40:21 AM PDT
by
AxelPaulsenJr
(Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush.)
To: BonnieJ
I've never seen anything like it about a nominee from their own paty.Ditto, I remain in shock at what I consider to be the absolute childish pettiness of some on our side.
94
posted on
10/11/2005 6:42:09 AM PDT
by
AxelPaulsenJr
(Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush.)
To: Always Right
I guess what amazes me about all of this is, and pardon me if I missed it from you earlier. But, did you or do you have the same feelings about Judge Roberts when he was nominated to be Chief Justice? The fact that his nomination passed with such apparent ease would make me think that he is as much of a moderate as Ms. Miers.
95
posted on
10/11/2005 6:49:10 AM PDT
by
AxelPaulsenJr
(Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush.)
To: Itzlzha
Don't post a picture of a Howler monkey, or any monkey, in this context again. Thank you, and I'm serious.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson