Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The site where this link is from is a buisiness site catering to the adult industry and to the best of my knowledge contains no pornographic images.

In 2001, Hardcore was prosecuted by the city of Los Angeles for obscenity, which was not resolved until 2004 with a company plea to a public nuisance.

When one is charged with obscenity in Los Angeles, you can bet the stuff is out there. I'm not going to plead ignorance to Hardcore's work. I have seen it. If you have never seen a Max Hardcore film, you have abolutely never seen anything like it. Watching this film was a stomach-churning experience. There was nothing arousing about it at all.

I'd be willing to bet that 99% of the population who enjoy pornography would find a film by Max Hardcore to be totally repulsive.

He's not well-liked within the industry for two major reasons. First, he scares away the new talent. Young women who find themselves in his films usually are new to the business and typically flee the industry after being subjected to the painful, wholly humiliating and degrading experience of working with this man. Second, he is indefensible. He epitomizes everything that those against pornography rally against. He makes Larry Flynt look like Walt Disney and your typical Vivid Video production look like wholesome family entertainment. That is no hyperbole.

1 posted on 10/10/2005 1:05:44 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
To: Drew68; Jersey Republican Biker Chick
Gee, I hope my e mail address won't be cross referenced for my Federal Background Investigation.
 
Owl_Eagle

(If what I just wrote makes you sad or angry,

 it was probably sarcasm)

2 posted on 10/10/2005 1:09:59 PM PDT by South Hawthorne (In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Drew68

OK, so it's repulsive. So the federal gubmint should shut them down?


3 posted on 10/10/2005 1:11:54 PM PDT by Huck ("I'm calling a moratorium on Miers/Bush/GOP bashing--but it won't be easy (thanks tex))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Drew68

Sounds like the Feds are getting Hard Core with THEM!


5 posted on 10/10/2005 1:13:42 PM PDT by funkywbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Drew68

It's a good thing you re-viewed these movies for us, thanks.


7 posted on 10/10/2005 1:15:26 PM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Drew68

Nope. Never heard of him.


8 posted on 10/10/2005 1:15:57 PM PDT by Constitution Day (When life gives you lemons, just shut up and eat your damn lemons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Drew68

Max must be selling enough films to keep body and soul together so somebody is watching it.


9 posted on 10/10/2005 1:17:26 PM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Drew68
The offices of Max Hardcore’s Max World Entertainment were raided Wednesday under the authority of the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section of the Justice Department

I am sure a man as scrupulous and conscientious as Mr. Hardcore is very meticulous about verifying the ages of the "performers" in his "productions".
12 posted on 10/10/2005 1:19:19 PM PDT by Thrusher ("...there is no peace without victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Drew68

It's official. I'm over the hill and out of touch with the culture. I've never heard of this person.


13 posted on 10/10/2005 1:20:19 PM PDT by SE Mom (Keep an open mind; nothing will fall out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Drew68

OK, I will take your word for it.

Thanks for the research.


21 posted on 10/10/2005 1:26:29 PM PDT by SeeRushToldU_So (It is hotter than two rats screwing in a wool sock in GA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Drew68

Max can thank the FBI for the increase in sales this month....


23 posted on 10/10/2005 1:26:42 PM PDT by Pondman88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Drew68

Bravo! Hope they nail that slimebag


27 posted on 10/10/2005 1:28:39 PM PDT by kisanri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Drew68
I wonder if the FBI agents can sue the agency
if they go blind in the line of duty.
30 posted on 10/10/2005 1:34:13 PM PDT by Edmund Dante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Drew68

I'll have to admit, His work IS fairly disturbing.


32 posted on 10/10/2005 1:35:05 PM PDT by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Drew68
Here's a Wikipedia summary of his work: Max Hardcore. Yes, it sounds repulsive, but the last time I checked the First Amendment still begins "Congress shall make no law.." What part of "no law" is difficult to understand? If the state wants to deal with it, then fine, but the Feds have no constitutional authority. It seems that the State of California already dealt with it as they saw fit.
39 posted on 10/10/2005 1:39:54 PM PDT by AntiGuv ()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Drew68

Has the ACLU stepped up to provide Max's legal defense for free yet?


40 posted on 10/10/2005 1:39:57 PM PDT by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Drew68

I would have posted the same thoughts, almost verbatim.

Well stated.


42 posted on 10/10/2005 1:40:42 PM PDT by relictele (How can Hillary run the country when she couldn't manage a household of 3?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Drew68
Shame on the Department of Justice. I am proud of my movies and of those who sell them.

He would be hung tomorrow in my world.

46 posted on 10/10/2005 1:43:07 PM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Drew68
. . . he is indefensible. He epitomizes everything that those against pornography rally against.

As porno posts always do, this one brought out the libertarians. And, as always, they brought with them the usual cliches about the First Amendment and the nanny state and so on. The zinger is supposed to be, "Is this the sort of country you want to live in?"

Truth is, the kind of country that treats Max Hardcore material as worthy of protection is NOT the kind of country I want to live in. I hope they shut him down - and shut down anybody else inclined to follow his lead.

80 posted on 10/10/2005 2:07:43 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Drew68
(ed. movie titles ommitted)

Forest Hump? Splendor In the *ss?

86 posted on 10/10/2005 2:17:48 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Drew68

Ah, for the good old days of the "Fabulous Dark Brothers" and Gerard Damiano.


90 posted on 10/10/2005 2:19:12 PM PDT by Clemenza (Gentlemen, Behold!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson