[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

Well, I've not seen his work so I can't comment on it.

I googled and took a sneak peek - here it is summed up:

Urination
Defecation
Fisting
Choking
Rough anal sex
Gagging

All performed on teeny-bopping, middle-school looking girls.

This isn't porn, this is legalized snuff child pornography masquerading as "art."

[Huck]

But what to do when they aren't really children, and they aren't really dying? What to do when it's all fictional? And how about when it becomes all digitized--no real people involved? I know this stuff is plainly what it is, but I still don't like the fed gubmint deciding what i can see, read, hear, think.

[Phantom Lord]

This isn't porn, this is legalized snuff child pornography masquerading as "art."

Being that no children are involved, it is not child porn.

[reagan_fanatic]

I've never understood the kind of person who finds violent sex films like this exciting. Mainstream porn is one thing, but the sick garbage this guy puts out is seriously disturbing and makes me wonder about the mental health of the people who buy this crap.

[Atlas Sneezed]

>>All performed on teeny-bopping, middle-school looking girls.

Adults presumably, in the absence of evidence to the contrary/

>>This isn't porn, this is legalized snuff child pornography masquerading as "art."

Snuff requires death. Rough sex is rough sex. There is no evidence that they are even faking death, which Hollywood does all the time.

Is this about opposing porn you don't like, and tolerating porn you do like, or are you opposed to all porn?