Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Media Might Be Missing a Story and Ignoring a Terrorist
Dallas Morning News ^ | October 12, 2005 | Mark Davis

Posted on 10/12/2005 4:45:14 AM PDT by texianyankee

Imagine a man with a bomb strapped to his body making his way into a packed football stadium, reaching his seat and blowing himself up. There would be a heavy death toll in what would be the first successful terrorist act on U.S. soil since 9-11.

Jolting us back to memories of the Oklahoma City bombing, this would obviously be a massive headline in our ongoing war on terror. One would think attention would be heightened even further if such a story were to occur again in Oklahoma.

Well, there's reason to believe it nearly happened, and it was indeed in Oklahoma, making the paltry coverage of the story unfathomable.

On Oct. 1, as the Oklahoma Sooners hosted Kansas State in front of 84,000 fans, University of Oklahoma student Joel Hinrichs III blew himself up outside the stadium.

There is evidence that he sought to enter the game and was turned away by security after refusing to allow his backpack to be searched. Some minutes later, that backpack, containing the chosen explosive of shoe bomber Richard Reid and the London subway bombers, exploded, killing Mr. Hinrichs as he sat on a bench.

There have been some dutiful print and broadcast accounts of this event, all leaning heavily on the favored establishment take – that this was a troubled young man who sought only to kill himself, simply doing so in an offbeat way.

Oh, really?

Well, what if the young man had a Pakistani roommate? What if he had been spending time at the Islamic Center of Norman, Okla., once frequented by "20th hijacker" Zacarias Moussaoui? What if the warrant used in the search of the bomber's apartment had been sealed by federal authorities?

What if explosives had been found in that apartment? What if the young man had tried to purchase ammonium nitrate, the chosen explosive of Tim McVeigh, at a Norman feed store days earlier?

That's a lot of what ifs, and they range from the confirmed to the unconfirmed. But the parts we do know – the Pakistani roommate, the attempted fertilizer purchase, the veil of secrecy around the investigation – should be enough to cast doubt on the simplistic "troubled young man" theory favored by, among others, OU's nervous president, David Boren.

Mr. Hinrichs' father told me his son was not the type to join radical causes and would not want to hurt anyone. But his son's chosen method – blowing himself up in a public place – would seem to cast doubt on his concern for his fellow man.

As for the terrorist angle, Mr. Hinrichs is now the subject of understandably intense scrutiny, virtually none of it from the mainstream media. You might think the story fizzled because there was, in fact, no death beyond the bomber. True enough, but I'd suggest that if a raid revealed some radical plan to bomb an abortion clinic anywhere in America, the suspects would be household names by nightfall without a single fuse lit.

Something about the nature of this event has swallowed almost whole the normal curiosity one would expect from the usual sources.

Is it political, because acknowledging a terror threat on our soil might bolster President Bush's war logic? Is it economic, out of fear of scaring people away from football games? Is it geographic snobbery because it didn't happen on either coast? Or is it a PC fear of seeming to lunge toward a jihadist angle?

Whatever the reason, hunting for details of this shocking story puts you in some offbeat company.

Jayna Davis is a writer who has spent years documenting what she asserts is an Islamic connection to the Oklahoma City bombing. She has a fan in Douglas Hagmann, director of an outfit called the Northeastern Intelligence Network, whose Web site (homelandsecurityus.com) has a conspiracy geek vibe that might spark scoffing.

But the fact of the matter is that these people are breaking fresh news on this story that only later winds up in more conventional news outlets.

I'm not calling for a leap to the conclusion that Mr. Hinrichs was another in a series of Caucasians pressed into service by terror cells for their undercover value. But it seems equally unwise to shrug dismissively at the possibility.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; US: Oklahoma; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: atntdf; bomb; cellatou; hinrichs; islamofascists; jihadiatou; joelhinrichs; leftistbias; leftistcensorship; mediabias; normanbomber; okc; oklahoma; oklahomabomber; oubomber; oubombing; terror; terrorism; trop; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-147 last
To: MizSterious

Hinrich's wallet was in his pants, with his ID. That's how they knew right away who he was.

The rest of him, above the waist, was blown to bits and splattered all over the busses in the parking lot.

That is bull about him "not wanting to hurt anyone else". (What his father said). A busdriver was a few feet away from him when the bomb went off. Hinrichs knew this because the driver spoke to him seconds before the explosion.


101 posted on 10/12/2005 1:28:36 PM PDT by Palladin (America! America! God shed His grace on Thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Spunky

I disagree with you and here is why I think that Hussain al Hussaini is John Doe #2 (now there may be other John Doe's but I am talking about THE John Doe #2)

(1) Many witnesses in Oklahoma City were positive of their identification of him.

(2) He was in Oklahoma (Not one witness puts Jose Padilla in Oklahoma City at the time of the Murrah bombing)

(3) Jayna Davis has not written about the security cameras, but from the information I know about there is an extremely strong possibility that the side profile of John Doe #2 (not the front sketch) was taken off a security camera. That is why it was in profile - maybe when he pulled up in the Ryder truck when the camera would catch it. I have an acetate copy of the side sketch of John Doe #2 that the authorities put out and a photo of Hussain and there is an ABSOLUTE PERFECT match, which could be explained if it were taken off of a security camera. In a Freedom of Information court case, the government admits to tapes off of security cameras that have not been made public.

(4) Jayna Davis has a lot of information in her book about the confusion that led to the first sketch coming out on John Doe #2. I believe that her investigation shows that the first sketch (frontal view) was based on information provided by witnesses at Elliott's Body Shop. Their John Doe could have even been a different person than the one in Oklahoma City. Read her chapter called Dead Ringer. If you pull up the original arrest warrant for John Doe #2, the description is different from the description from Elliott's Body Shop's John Doe. The FBI may have issued this warrant from the security camera and witness statements in Oklahoma City. Also, it wouldn't necessarily have been the same John Doe as was in Elliott's. I got a copy of it early in the investigation and had a difficult time getting it. The people in records first denied it even existed. It may not be available now. The description fits Hussain.




102 posted on 10/12/2005 2:04:25 PM PDT by Nancie Drew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Thanks for the ping, indcons.


103 posted on 10/12/2005 2:10:44 PM PDT by Just A Nobody (Proud member of the Water Bucket Brigade - It's all about MOOSEMUSS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

>>If only one plane were hijacked and one tower hit on that day I

Remember Flight 587?


104 posted on 10/12/2005 2:15:10 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Justanobody

You're welcome, Justanobody. How are you doing?


105 posted on 10/12/2005 2:22:50 PM PDT by indcons (Let the Arabs take care of their jihadi brothers this time around (re: Paki earthquake))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: indcons
I'm doing well. Lot's going on right now. Can't follow everything as much as I would like.

How's it with you?

106 posted on 10/12/2005 2:43:08 PM PDT by Just A Nobody (Proud member of the Water Bucket Brigade - It's all about MOOSEMUSS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Justanobody

Pretty good....was out of town and returned on Monday night. Have been following and participating in the heated Miers' threads in addition to tracking the Norman bombing PC cover-up. I agree....lots of stuff going on :)


107 posted on 10/12/2005 2:46:33 PM PDT by indcons (Let the Arabs take care of their jihadi brothers this time around (re: Paki earthquake))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
Remember Flight 587?

Absolutely, SG. Unfortunately not too many others do.

About the most obvious coverup imaginable.

108 posted on 10/12/2005 3:06:47 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
"... I hope this doesn't offend you or anyone else,............"

There is no offense taken.

Ever since I tried to teach myself Spanish by reading it and looking up the meanings of words, I find my spelling has gone kaput. I now tend to spell phonetically. :-)

109 posted on 10/12/2005 3:08:48 PM PDT by Spunky ("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: texianyankee

Thank you very much for the ping. It's a good editorial that will raise questions in the minds of the readers for sure. That's what I'm looking for at this point. To raise the questions, and keep pressure on the authorities to check out ALL possible angles no matter how "un-PC" they might be...


110 posted on 10/12/2005 3:23:24 PM PDT by LibertyRocks (OUBombing summary (UPDATED 10/12) @ http://sweetliberty.alfablog.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nancie Drew
"I have an acetate copy of the side sketch of John Doe #2 that the authorities put out and a photo of Hussain and there is an ABSOLUTE PERFECT match, which could be explained if it were taken off of a security camera."

I must admit I haven't read Jayna's book. I am going to see if I can find a copy of it and read it, because I remember on one of the early threads after Jayna came out with the book a Freeper posted those pictures and a lot of us still could not see the resemblance. Maybe if I read her explanation why it is Husanni I will be more convinced.

111 posted on 10/12/2005 3:29:27 PM PDT by Spunky ("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Former Dodger

What do you make of this?


http://globalresearch.ca.myforums.net/viewtopic.php?p=11044


112 posted on 10/12/2005 3:39:28 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Understand islam understand evil - read THE LIFE OF MUHAMMAD free pdf see link My Page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: All; Americanexpat; texianyankee
I do believe this Cheema character is involved up to his ears. I also believe that Cheemas's statements he is an athiest is BS and a smoke screen.

Just thought I'd clarify a bit about the atheist statment. This was stated by a man by the name of Tariq Alzoubi... He also stated that Cheema "MIGHT" be Pakistani. That raised questions in my mind whether Tariq really knew Cheema well at all... I too think it's a smoke screen and Tariq apparently has some motives to keeping this quiet as well...

I found some interesting stuff out about Tariq Alzoubi in a google search last night.

1.) He is a semi-weekly columnist for the OU paper.
2.) He was the "co-composer" of a student website at OU about the middle east situation (mostly gulf war) - a "joke?" on the page mentions another "co-composer" of the pages at the site is listed as "Mohamed Jihad".
3.) He wrote an opinion piece re: Al-Jazeera that has been re-published on the "Friends of Al-Jazeera" website.
4.) He also wrote a recent (9/13/05) Letter to the Editor of the Arab Times in which he talks about the "West" "pushing us around".

All of these things raises questions in my mind over whether he indeed knew Cheema well enough to really speak to his religious feelings, or whether he is a self-appointed spokesperson and is attempting to create a smokescreen as Americanexpat pointed out. I personally believe he may be the author of the most recent editorial published by OU which contained heavy spin, accused journalists of being hack and lying, etc... See this FR Thread: The FBI Needs to Start Talking (OU Spin Alert)

You can see links to all of these things in the Comprehensive Summary at my blog. The section on Tariq is the second to last section on the page which is very long. Better to scroll all the way down and go up to see it.

Tariq was interviewed by several papers and has given his statements about this situation to the media. IMHO he is not someone they should be talking to seeing the apparent views he holds...
113 posted on 10/12/2005 3:39:43 PM PDT by LibertyRocks (OUBombing summary (UPDATED 10/12) @ http://sweetliberty.alfablog.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

Someone asked for a pic.
114 posted on 10/12/2005 3:43:27 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Understand islam understand evil - read THE LIFE OF MUHAMMAD free pdf see link My Page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Spunky

Actually, I saw the pictures aired on local teevee of the fellow just after the bombing. I might be mistaken, but they might have been on one of Jayna Davis's newscasts, before the NYT bought the teevee station and let her go. In those, he looked exactly like JDII.


115 posted on 10/12/2005 4:50:51 PM PDT by MizSterious (Now, if only we could convince them all to put on their bomb-vests and meet in Mecca...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Palladin

How did they know so soon who his roommate was, and where he was that evening so they could arrest him? Doesn't that strike you as odd? Wouldn't that normally take hours, not minutes? And, bear in mind, they still haven't positively id'ed him--they're waiting on dna tests.


116 posted on 10/12/2005 4:56:18 PM PDT by MizSterious (Now, if only we could convince them all to put on their bomb-vests and meet in Mecca...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: maggief

FBI story and that of our local officials are worlds apart. Pardon me if I take the side of our local officials over the side of the FBI. :)


117 posted on 10/12/2005 5:02:19 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: texianyankee

The media did not miss it. They are ignoring it. They only run with anything that will embarrish President Bush.


118 posted on 10/12/2005 5:07:56 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sport

I agree, the article headline should be:
Media is ignoring a story and might be missing a terrorist.


119 posted on 10/12/2005 5:18:28 PM PDT by texianyankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Thanks for the ping indcons.


120 posted on 10/12/2005 5:35:14 PM PDT by fatima (Have a glass of wine.It will relax you.Wine Mod here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Thanks for the ping on this....it is an interesting article.


121 posted on 10/12/2005 5:48:28 PM PDT by milford421
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: texianyankee

Thanks for the ping! (o:


122 posted on 10/12/2005 6:53:20 PM PDT by LibertyRocks (OUBombing summary (UPDATED 10/12) @ http://sweetliberty.alfablog.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

"His father actually said he'd exploded himself where he did because "he didn't want to hurt anyone." The fact is, there was a large parking lot at his apartment complex where it would have been far less likely he'd "hurt anyone."

There is also the famous 'DUCK POND' near by..he could have gone there..HE DIDN'T!!


123 posted on 10/12/2005 7:28:41 PM PDT by penelopesire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Some folks in the media are starting to get it.

Is any one in the media covering this? I have not seen it mentioned after the first day or two.

124 posted on 10/12/2005 7:33:24 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Sounds like it is time to vote COLE out of office!! This is just plain disgusting at this point!! What a load of cow patties!


125 posted on 10/12/2005 7:33:32 PM PDT by penelopesire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Lizarde
I'm bomb making challenged but I am still wondering why he went to buy the fertizer two days before he exploded...wasn't the bomb made of something else? Are those ingredients easier to get or was he trying to make several varieties of bombs.

My guess is that Hinrichs and his cohorts were going to do to the stadium what McVeigh and his cohorts did to the Murrah building. They planned to use a vehicle (perhaps Hinrichs' car) filled with ANFO triggered by TATP. The fact that Hinrichs tried to obtain ammonium nitrate a couple of days before the bombing indicates he wanted it for that attack. But he failed to obtain the AN, so they went with a back-up plan instead: putting a backpack with the TATP inside the stadium.

126 posted on 10/12/2005 8:00:07 PM PDT by laz (They can bus 'em to the polls, but they can't bus 'em out of the path of a Cat 5 hurricane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: maggief

And so it goes... seeing as this is an AP article I suppose this is what will be printed across the country and this event will "dry up" unless individual agents within the investigation come forward. I can't see that happening at this point and even if they did they couldn't identify themselves or risk losing their jobs.

I don't believe anything this Congressman or the FBI are saying at this point - how could it go from "can't talk about that" - to DEFINITELY NOT??? (RE; the materials found). Plus, I thought that was under wraps per the justice department.

This IMHO this still stinks to high heaven and a cover-up is now going on - with more officials getting in on the act - just as it has since day 1.


127 posted on 10/12/2005 8:04:33 PM PDT by LibertyRocks (OUBombing summary (UPDATED 10/12) @ http://sweetliberty.alfablog.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
It's OKC '95 all over again. I wouldn't mind the cover-up so much if I were confident that the authorities were quietly dismantling these cells behind the scenes and eliminating the threat. But the threat wasn't eliminated after OKC '95, and these cells are still there even after 9/11.

IMO, the worst result of a cover-up is that the terrorists will up the ante next time, to make sure their intentions and message are obvious.

128 posted on 10/12/2005 8:24:28 PM PDT by laz (They can bus 'em to the polls, but they can't bus 'em out of the path of a Cat 5 hurricane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: SerpentDove

". . . it's good to see the Dallas Morning News published his editorial."

He's a regular DMN columnist.


129 posted on 10/12/2005 8:28:23 PM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks
Interesting, Fred, but the credibility and veracity of the article and site came into question with the "updated" Guernica picture including GWB, Rumsfeld, et al, as well as the "endwar.com" tag at the bottom of the pic.

It amazes me how the left attacks Bush for being stupid, yet connects him to all these anazingly intricate conspiracies.

Do I think there is an Islamic connection to the OK City bombers? Yes, without a doubt, and also without much evidence.

Do I think there is an Islamic connection to the latest bombing in OK? Yes, again, but there is more evidence.

And for "strike 3" there is the Moussouwi/ Norman mosque connection.

Any "theory" that points fingers at the US and ignores the Islamist connection is pure fantasy, in my estimation.

130 posted on 10/12/2005 8:42:59 PM PDT by Former Dodger ( "Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." --Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Spunky

Some people back in those days were still trying to compare the front view picture. She builds a strong case in her book that we should totally disregard the frontal shot sketch of John Doe #2 but not the side profile.

If you do get her book to read, the paperback has an additional chapter that is an update on things that happened after her hardback came out. For instance, Richard Clarke and his mention of the Philippine connection with Nichols, the mention of her book to Louie Freeh in the 9-11 hearings, and her discovery that Zawahiri visited Oklahoma in the spring of 1995. Also, there is a chapter that talks about the Norman connection to terrorists.


131 posted on 10/12/2005 8:46:03 PM PDT by Nancie Drew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: laz

You make an excellent point laz. They WANT the attention - that's why they finally did 9/11 - attacks against the military weren't enough.

At this point the leaders of AQ are probably focusing attention on Iraq and how to achieve control over it after the US leaves - per the letter intercepted. But that doesn't mean that the cells in the US are not plotting future attacks. I think the cell in Norman will be even more active considering what kind of response this latest episode has gotten. I mean - they didn't even interrogate these people.

A little Off-Topic:
Another thing that strikes me as somewhat unbelievable is because you KNOW if it were drugs and not explosives found the DEA would be ALL over EVERYONE even remotely associated with Hinrichs - charging or attempting to charge them with all kinds of conspiracy charges in order to get people to talk.

Maybe some of the DEA Agents should be transferred to fighting terrorism!!! IMHO they are better trained than these FBI guys, they've got the tools to protect themselves against these terrorists, and they could use their expertise in undercover ops and such to bust these cells wide open... THAT would be a better use of our tax dollars at this point, IMHO.


132 posted on 10/12/2005 8:57:22 PM PDT by LibertyRocks (OUBombing summary (UPDATED 10/12) @ http://sweetliberty.alfablog.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

The Duck Pond is what I have been thinking all along, as the most obvious "open area" where he *could* have done his handiwork. You're so right.


133 posted on 10/12/2005 9:04:28 PM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Rte66

u know..it doesn't even matter. We all know this kid had murder in the name of Islam on his mind. No rocket science required for this psycho drama. What is required is a sort of bravery in spite of the media. A bravery to call a terrorist a terrorist!! For cryin out loud..what is so hard about that?


134 posted on 10/12/2005 9:41:27 PM PDT by penelopesire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
At this point the leaders of AQ are probably focusing attention on Iraq and how to achieve control over it after the US leaves - per the letter intercepted. But that doesn't mean that the cells in the US are not plotting future attacks.

If I were AQ, I wouldn't concentrate all my energy and effort into fighting the US in Iraq. I'd try to carry out a rash of localized domestic attacks in the US so that the anti-war movement could claim that our presense in Iraq is backfiring and inciting domestic terrorism. You and I both know that normal people would only be enraged by such attacks and would support the war being escalated. But I think it's a safe bet that liberals would vent their rage at Bush instead of the terrorists, and demand that we withdraw.

So if I were AQ, I'd deploy my best operatives in Iraq to continue harrassing the coalition there, and at the same time, I'd employ domestic recruits in the US to carry out enough small attacks to increase liberal whining and erode support for the war. AQ knows they have many friends here -- in Congress, in the MSM, in academia, in Hollywood -- that would exploit such attacks in accordance with their agenda.

135 posted on 10/12/2005 11:20:59 PM PDT by laz (They can bus 'em to the polls, but they can't bus 'em out of the path of a Cat 5 hurricane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: laz

And that's why, in the final analysis, I believe the MSM hasn't covered the OU bombing for the simple fact that it didn't succeed. Had Hinrichs succeeded in pulling off what he planned, and killed a lot of people in the stadium, the MSM would have been all over the story. Not because such an event couldn't be ignored, but because they would use it to bash Bush and the war.


136 posted on 10/12/2005 11:26:32 PM PDT by laz (They can bus 'em to the polls, but they can't bus 'em out of the path of a Cat 5 hurricane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

Makes you wonder why Greta couldn't devote a few shows to the OU bombing instead of the dead blonde of the week. If Hinrichs had been as cute as Taylor Behl, Greta might be camping out in Norman, Oklahoma.


137 posted on 10/13/2005 12:22:19 AM PDT by AZLiberty (Binary: The Power of Two)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: laz

I think it's very hard to buy ammonium nitrate these days. I was listening to a gardening show on the radio the other day, and the host was saying that nowadays you have to buy calcium nitrate instead of ammonium nitrate. Perhaps this hasn't been publicized (except by this talk show host) in hopes of nabbing any Jihadists -- like Hinrichs -- who haven't gotten the news yet.


138 posted on 10/13/2005 12:27:24 AM PDT by AZLiberty (Binary: The Power of Two)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: laz; All

You make some very good points laz. The press is so concerned with the PC part of this - typical to say the least... If they could use it to bash the war, I'm sure they would. I've seen on some blogs and forums that have talked about this the anti-war crowd says "I thought we were fighting them there so we wouldn't have to fight them here". They are delusional if they wish to ignore the fact that they are ALREADY here and have been for quite some time...

Some interesting articles I ran across earlier tonight and have added to the summary at my blog:

The Muslim Student Association: A Wahabbi Front
by Steven Schwartz (a Muslim) - orginally published on NationalReview.com
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=6579
[Houda Elyazgi - interviewed on MSNBC on the OU Bombing represents the Muslim Student Association at OU]

How I made "Jihad in America" and lived to tell about it
by Steve Emerson - Chapter 1 Online at the AIJAC!
http://www.aijac.org.au/updates/Mar-02/060402.html
Book Excerpt mentions (among other things) a meeting of the Muslim Arab Youth Association (MAYA) that he sat in on back in 1992. Incredible information about the state of terrorists in America. Emerson is a former CNN reporter who quit his job to pursue his investigations full-time.


139 posted on 10/13/2005 2:02:16 AM PDT by LibertyRocks (OUBombing summary (UPDATED 10/13) @ http://sweetliberty.alfablog.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks

Have you heard any reports that there were "pellets" embedded in a nearby tree that were from the bomb?
Was this an early rumor that has since been disproven?

Specifically, I was told that Greg Knapp from KLIF-570 stated that info.

Maybe it has since been proven wrong. I was told this by a person I know who lives in the Dallas area & heard Knapp make that claim on his radio show.


140 posted on 10/13/2005 5:13:58 AM PDT by texianyankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo; swarthyguy

Pardon my memory......but could you remind me about flight 587?

Thanks.


141 posted on 10/13/2005 5:29:12 AM PDT by texianyankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: texianyankee
Why Did American Airlines 587 Crash?, by Daniel Pipes, August 30, 2004
142 posted on 10/13/2005 9:10:47 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Peach; PhiKapMom

Bill Hemmer of Fox talking with the editor to the OU student newspaper now. Tres Savage saying that FBI and Boren spoke with reporters yesterday and it is less likely Hinrichs was involved in conspiratorial activities with Muslim radicals and more likely just a loner. Not true (he says) was finding of Muslim literature in Hinrichs apartment and Hinrichs attending the Mosque. FBI saying it will have more to say in a few weeks. Savage says its important to clear up these descrepancies and others. Finishes by saying we're "on the backside of the mountain now" contrary to what some web sites are saying.

A short, disappointing interview that appears to support the official story not withstanding evidence to the contrary here.


143 posted on 10/13/2005 10:00:54 AM PDT by CedarDave (What do Sandy Burglar and Slick Willie have in common? Problems with what's in their pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #144 Removed by Moderator

To: LibertyRocks

Methinks Tariq is a big fibber...and an undercover something-or-other.


145 posted on 10/13/2005 12:03:33 PM PDT by Palladin (America! America! God shed His grace on Thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Former Dodger

Thanks, even after a third reading my head is still spinning. The body of this giant beast is being deliberately submerged beneath misinformation. Isn't this the same University that Nick Berg briefly attended? Funny how Hinrich's father sounds the same as Nick Berg's - both said their sons were conservative. I'm beginning to think that's a code word for ISLAMIC conservative...wahabbi conservative if you know what I mean...


146 posted on 10/13/2005 7:01:06 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Understand islam understand evil - read THE LIFE OF MUHAMMAD free pdf see link My Page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Former Dodger

When I first caught wind of this story and started pinging people, and calling family who live in the area, my gut said this was a jihadist act - even if of a home-grown convert variety. I have yet to see a single fact percolate up to the surface which contradicts my initial instincts...

Not that it qualifies me as a prophet or anything...just call me another clown prince of grasping the obvious - LOL!

Thanks for the ping!

A.A.C.

"Let the Final Crusade commence!"


147 posted on 10/14/2005 10:47:31 AM PDT by AmericanArchConservative (Armour on, Lances high, Swords out, Bows drawn, Shields front ... Eagles UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-147 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson