Skip to comments.The Statistics on Homosexuality and its Effects
Posted on 10/13/2005 10:08:23 AM PDT by Coleus
click here to read article
Why is it that the more reprehensible and disgusting behavior is, the more it is revered and cherished by the left?
The NEA supports the gay agenda in spite of the effects on children.
How many members of the NEA support a gay agenda because they have a personal interest promoting the freedom to prey on whoever they desire, no matter what the age or gender?
I wish insurance companies could act on these statistics,
I had this discussion with this uber-left person I know. This person is rabidly anti-religion, and pro-evolution (not that there is anything wrong with being either, but I wanted to point out that for this person, it's all evolution). So I asked this person, "all opinions aside, what evolutionary purpose does homoseuality serve?" The response, "you're such a homophobe," and then this person walked away.
LOL and so accurate.
Really, is there any evil the left doesn't support and aid?
WARNING: Explicit content.
It is my humble opinion that homosexuals are created by other homosexuals. So many tell the same story: "I was molested as a boy (some as young as four years old) by a man/priest/uncle " etc. So these otherwise normally functioning hetero boys believe that when (if) they became sexually aroused through stimulation, they must have enjoyed it. Which means they must be homosexual.
The fact is that their equipment worked. Period. They became aroused because their equipment worked. That does not mean they enjoyed it. That does not mean they are homosexual. It means they were savagely violated by a pervert.
I'm sure this thread will be pulled soon. It offers way too much of an opportunity for rational discussion of a sensitive subject.
I wonder if DIVERSITY TRAINING crappolla includes the 'downside' of homosexual behavior.
Here is the thread title, it was posted yesterday.
The Unholy Sacrament of Diversity Training The Remnant
^ | 10/05 | William Price
Because it undermines the country and its government.
BUMP to be read by EVERYONE!
This is why GLSEN wants to be with your children.
The law does not consider 18 year olds "boys" and for 18, 19 and 20 year olds, younger ages may be an "acceptable" consent age. I haven't looked at the source of the footnote, but I suspect they included 18 year olds since it added weight to the statistic they were trying to portray. We could also look at the age of the questioned when the activity tookplace. It may be possible that this response included acts committed before the men questioned were 18 as there is no time frame established for the act.
I only highlight this, since purposely skewed statistics, will be sighted by others to debunk the entire content.
The homosexual lifestyle is much more dangerous than smoking. I wonder when state AG's are going to sue "big gay" to fund anti-homosexual programs...
not that there's anything wrong with that...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.