Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FastCoyote
Exactly right. She doesn't have to challenge the libs. She only has to vote the right way, and leave the great decisions to Scalia and Thomas and Roberts.

Sorry, but nine eggheads, even conservative eggheads, is a disaster waiting to happen. You need people with pragmatic, everyday outlooks to know how laws affect real people. As Bill Buckley often said, "I'd trust myself to the first 100 names in the Boston phone book than the faculty of Harvard," and in this case I'd trust the decisions of nine average Americans just as soon as a bunch of "brilliant" legal scholars---of any stripe.

23 posted on 10/17/2005 10:57:13 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: LS

She doesn't have to challenge the libs. She only has to vote the right way, and and you certainly don't need brains for that. In fact, brains are just a hindrance to good jurisprudence. Leave the great decisions to Scalia and Thomas and Roberts, then just use Miers as a convenient sock puppet to rubber stamp the ideas of men with brains. I don't know why people think a woman on the Supreme Court should have brains anyway, how much brain work does it take to make coffee or write a cute birthday card?

Sorry, but nine eggheads, even conservative eggheads, is a disaster waiting to happen. Especially ones who believed in strict constructionism, cause there's no knowing where a strict reading of the Constitution will lead you. Could be anywhere, conservative penumbras anyone?

You need people with pragmatic, everyday outlooks to know how laws affect real people. Like, how a parking ticket gets written or how many spotted owls does it take to make a pie. As Bill Buckley often said, "I'd trust myself to the first 100 names in the Boston phone book than the faculty of Harvard,". That's why we need to go the opposite way and find someone of low IQ, lower than mine even.

I'd trust the decisions of nine average Americans just as soon as a bunch of "brilliant" legal scholars---of any stripe. Sort of the way 12 jurors awarded $250 million in the Vioxx case, putting an entire industry in chaos. Now there's jurisprudence for ya, straight from the common man.


24 posted on 10/17/2005 11:12:28 AM PDT by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: LS

I keep wondering how many justices the next president will appoint and what the results will be.


25 posted on 10/17/2005 11:17:34 AM PDT by B4Ranch (In 3 to 5 seconds check- employees immigration status - http://uscis.gov/graphics/services/SAVE.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: LS

I think you may have missed Fast Coyote's point.


27 posted on 10/17/2005 11:31:10 AM PDT by brivette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson