Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Survey USA: Approval Rating for President George W. Bush (In all 50 States as of 10-18-05)
Survey USA ^ | October 18, 2005

Posted on 10/18/2005 1:24:14 PM PDT by RWR8189

APPROVAL RATING FOR PRESIDENT GEORGE W BUSH AS OF 10/18/05
 SORT ► SORTED ALPHABETICALLY BY STATE
SORTED BY 10/05 'NET APPROVAL' 
SORTED BY 'APPROVAL' IN DESCENDING ORDER
Sorted
JOB APPROVAL / PRESIDENT GEORGE W BUSH  (Released 10/18/05)
SORTED ALPHBETICALLY BY STATE  
10/18/2005 Net 10/05
Approval
Link to Interactive Tracking Graphs
with Sub-Selects for Demographics
# State '04 ECV Approve Disapprove
1 Alabama Bush 48% 49% -1% Alabama Bush Approval Tracked
2 Alaska Bush 52% 44% 8% Alaska Bush Approval Tracked
3 Arizona Bush 40% 55% -15% Arizona Bush Approval Tracked
4 Arkansas Bush 38% 58% -20% Arkansas Bush Approval Tracked
5 California Kerry 32% 65% -33% California Bush Approval Tracked
6 Colorado Bush 42% 57% -15% Colorado Bush Approval Tracked
7 Connecticut Kerry 32% 66% -34% Connecticut Bush Approval Tracked
8 Delaware Kerry 33% 65% -32% Delaware Bush Approval Tracked
9 Florida Bush 41% 58% -17% Florida Bush Approval Tracked
10 Georgia Bush 46% 52% -6% Georgia Bush Approval Tracked
11 Hawaii Kerry 39% 54% -15% Hawaii Bush Approval Tracked
12 Idaho Bush 55% 44% 11% Idaho Bush Approval Tracked
13 Illinois Kerry 32% 66% -34% Illinois Bush Approval Tracked
14 Indiana Bush 44% 53% -9% Indiana Bush Approval Tracked
15 Iowa Bush 38% 61% -23% Iowa Bush Approval Tracked
16 Kansas Bush 43% 54% -11% Kansas Bush Approval Tracked
17 Kentucky Bush 46% 50% -4% Kentucky Bush Approval Tracked
18 Louisiana Bush 48% 49% -1% Louisiana Bush Approval Tracked
19 Maine Kerry 33% 66% -33% Maine Bush Approval Tracked
20 Maryland Kerry 33% 64% -31% Maryland Bush Approval Tracked
21 Massachusetts Kerry 28% 68% -40% Massachusetts Bush Approval Tracked
22 Michigan Kerry 33% 65% -32% Michigan Bush Approval Tracked
23 Minnesota Kerry 39% 58% -19% Minnesota Bush Approval Tracked
24 Mississippi Bush 48% 48% 0% Mississippi Bush Approval Tracked
25 Missouri Bush 39% 59% -20% Missouri Bush Approval Tracked
26 Montana Bush 49% 49% 0% Montana Bush Approval Tracked
27 Nebraska Bush 52% 45% 7% Nebraska Bush Approval Tracked
28 Nevada Bush 37% 60% -23% Nevada Bush Approval Tracked
29 New Hampshire Kerry 37% 61% -24% New Hampshire Bush Approval Tracked
30 New Jersey Kerry 34% 64% -30% New Jersey Bush Approval Tracked
31 New Mexico Bush 39% 58% -19% New Mexico Bush Approval Tracked
32 New York Kerry 30% 66% -36% New York Bush Approval Tracked
33 North Carolina Bush 41% 56% -15% North Carolina Bush Approval Tracked
34 North Dakota Bush 49% 48% 1% North Dakota Bush Approval Tracked
35 Ohio Bush 37% 61% -24% Ohio Bush Approval Tracked
36 Oklahoma Bush 51% 46% 5% Oklahoma Bush Approval Tracked
37 Oregon Kerry 38% 59% -21% Oregon Bush Approval Tracked
38 Pennsylvania Kerry 36% 62% -26% Pennsylvania Bush Approval Tracked
39 Rhode Island Kerry 29% 70% -41% Rhode Island Bush Approval Tracked
40 South Carolina Bush 40% 58% -18% South Carolina Bush Approval Tracked
41 South Dakota Bush 41% 56% -15% South Dakota Bush Approval Tracked
42 Tennessee Bush 40% 57% -17% Tennessee Bush Approval Tracked
43 Texas Bush 42% 54% -12% Texas Bush Approval Tracked
44 Utah Bush 61% 36% 25% Utah Bush Approval Tracked
45 Vermont Kerry 29% 69% -40% Vermont Bush Approval Tracked
46 Virginia Bush 41% 56% -15% Virginia Bush Approval Tracked
47 Washington Kerry 38% 59% -21% Washington Bush Approval Tracked
48 West Virginia Bush 43% 55% -12% West Virginia Bush Approval Tracked
49 Wisconsin Kerry 36% 61% -25% Wisconsin Bush Approval Tracked
50 Wyoming Bush 54% 44% 10% Wyoming Bush Approval Tracked
Weighted Average 38% 59% -21%  
('Weighted Average' means each state is weighted proportionally to its share of USA population. For example,
California, the most populated state, is given 71 times the weight of WY the least populated state, in a weighted avg.)
Unweighted Average 41% 57% -16%  
('Unweighted Average' means each state is given equal weight; population density is not taken into account).


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 50states; approval; bush43; jobapproval; poll; polls; surveyua; surveyusa; susa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-60 next last

1 posted on 10/18/2005 1:24:20 PM PDT by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Well, looks like we have to concede that the Bush Presidency is over. /sarc


2 posted on 10/18/2005 1:28:19 PM PDT by My2Cents (Dead people voting is the closest thing the Democrats come to believing in eternal life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Uh oh...Bush might lose re-election...


3 posted on 10/18/2005 1:28:29 PM PDT by RockinRight (I am beginning to think conservatism is buried somewhere under New Orleans' mud...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Really bad news in all the 2000 and 2004 battleground states except W. Virginia.

The gang of 14's states are controlling the national agenda, as it were, going into 2006, if this poll is to be taken seriously.


4 posted on 10/18/2005 1:28:30 PM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

I continue to be surprised by poll numbers from liberal states that show they don't approve of GWBs performance. His performance could not be too much more LIBERAL...with the exception of a token tax cut....


5 posted on 10/18/2005 1:28:41 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

I find it hilarious that Kerry gets so much approval. Don't these folks know that he was never president? Or --are these fools saying they would vote for him in '08 if he runs again? Either way, they're obviously Anti-American idiots!


6 posted on 10/18/2005 1:30:48 PM PDT by basil (Exercise your Second Amendment--buy another gun today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Notice La. and Ms. are some of the better ones for Bush. With everything we've seen (as the MSM reports it) those states should be the worst. Maybe 20% approve/ 80% disapprove?


7 posted on 10/18/2005 1:30:57 PM PDT by loreldan (Lincoln, Reagan, & G. W. Bush - the cure for Democrat lunacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Given that I can't see Republicans winning an election with just Alaska, Idaho, Utah and Wyoming, it might make sense for Bush to withdraw his support for Miers and return the Republican base to the fold.


8 posted on 10/18/2005 1:31:42 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Don't believe the lying MSM polls.


9 posted on 10/18/2005 1:31:55 PM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: basil
I find it hilarious that Kerry gets so much approval

Respondents weren't, to my knowledge, asked about Kerry. Only Bush. The Kerry/Bush column just shows if the state's red or blue, for reference purposes.

10 posted on 10/18/2005 1:33:07 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

GW has no one else to blame but himself. RINO-ism can be costly.


11 posted on 10/18/2005 1:33:42 PM PDT by Digger (Outsource CONgress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Ummmm!

I didn't know that we had co-Presidents as of 10-8-05.

Seems like Co-President Kerry has some strong ratings!


12 posted on 10/18/2005 1:35:09 PM PDT by aShepard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Another lib favoring weekend poll that did not even ask registered voters much less likely voters.
13 posted on 10/18/2005 1:35:25 PM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aShepard

See #10 -- that column just indicates who that state went for in 2004, for reference purposes.


14 posted on 10/18/2005 1:36:14 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
He has about 8 months to something dramatically "conservative" and bring the base back
15 posted on 10/18/2005 1:38:53 PM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
I continue to be surprised by poll numbers from liberal states that show they don't approve of GWBs performance. His performance could not be too much more LIBERAL...with the exception of a token tax cut....

How do we know what % of these ratings come from libs or conservatives? I would say that we might be surprised how many conservatives have had it with him.

16 posted on 10/18/2005 1:40:23 PM PDT by Digger (Outsource CONgress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents

If you go here you will see that virtually ALL the Staes below 40% went to Kerry in '04. I believe 2 went to Bush.



http://surveyusa.com/50State2005/50StatePOTUS1005SortedbyApproval.htm


17 posted on 10/18/2005 1:40:35 PM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: RWR8189
"Do you approve of President Bush stupid policies?"

Answer "Yes" or "No."

19 posted on 10/18/2005 1:41:54 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander
Really bad news

Why?

I don't give a rat's ass how popular Bush is, as long as he is right (and I believe he is).

What does matter, is that the validity of his position is deomonstrated before 2008, as a minimum, or before 2006 (preferably)

20 posted on 10/18/2005 1:42:45 PM PDT by Michael.SF. ('That was the gift the president gave us, the gift of happiness, of being together,' Cindy Sheehan")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: loreldan

In LA and MS it may have something to do with displaced residents not being surveyed. Clearly NO is a liberal hotbed, and I think even south MS may be more liberal than the rest of the state, what with all the transplants attracted by the casinos.


21 posted on 10/18/2005 1:43:09 PM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Seal the borders and boot all criminal illegal invaders and watch his approval ratings skyrocket. Are you listening George? (It's a no brainer)


22 posted on 10/18/2005 1:44:20 PM PDT by Buffettfan (http://www.swiftvets.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Talon IV
If you go here you will see that virtually ALL the Staes below 40% went to Kerry in '04. I believe 2 went to Bush.

Well, obviously the libs don't like Bush. But Ohio is at 37, New Mexico is at 39, Nevada has him at 37 and Iowa at 38. Moreover, he's at 40 and 41% in Arizona and Florida, respectively, two states that we absolutely have to win. And in Alabama -- even in that noted bastion of liberalism -- Bush's negs outweigh his positives. Bush has to return his base to the fold, or the Republican Party is in deep trouble ahead.

23 posted on 10/18/2005 1:46:40 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Javelina

I disapprove of the way Bush is handing some aspects of his job and am still voting for Kilgore. State and national politics are apples and oranges.


24 posted on 10/18/2005 1:48:03 PM PDT by DarthVader (Liberal Democrats = The Excrement of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Talon IV

Bush is at 43 in Kansas, probably the most socially conservative state in the union. Any time faves fall below 50, a politician is in trouble. 43 in Kansas? Kansas? When was the last time a Republican had to campaign there?


25 posted on 10/18/2005 1:48:56 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

To: Alter Kaker

Withdrawing Miers wouldn't matter.

The dems have said they will block any conservative nominee.

So Miers is blocked and we get another Rino Consuelo Callahan.


28 posted on 10/18/2005 1:52:53 PM PDT by johnmecainrino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Doing better in Oregon and Washington than in Ohio.

Hmmm...

29 posted on 10/18/2005 1:53:03 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Digger

Self-inflicted wounds.


30 posted on 10/18/2005 1:53:26 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (Socialist Dems, the MSM and Islamic murderers, ALL threats to the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Javelina
Republicans still won't have to campaign there. No matter what Bush's approval rating is in KS, KS will still go red.

No, I don't seriously believe that Hillary will win Kansas or Texas (42%), but the point is that if you're seeing those kinds of numbers in safe red states, its going to be next to impossible to sway traditional swing states. It's the base who staff local Republican clubs, go door-to-door on election day, etc., not moderates, and you need them the most in swing states. Even a small drop in base support can translate into huge drops at the ballot box, and that's what we may be facing.

31 posted on 10/18/2005 1:55:08 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

Problem is dems can block anything in congress with the fillabuster and in the process make Bush look weak.

I would only blame Bush if he had this agenda with 60 non rino senators that could drive his agenda home.


No president could make conservatives happy with the dems in congress having veto power.


32 posted on 10/18/2005 1:55:56 PM PDT by johnmecainrino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
600 adults age 18+ in each of the 50 states were interviewed by SurveyUSA 10/14/05 to 10/16/05. You must credit SurveyUSA of Verona NJ if you broadcast, print, or cite these results in whole or part. Click on each state to open link which contains the margin of sampling error for each state, a complete statement of methodology and fully crosstabbed data.
33 posted on 10/18/2005 1:57:08 PM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

The Kilgore-Kaine race will tell us a lot.

Bush won Virginia by 8 points.

Kaine is a liberal for tax hikes, pro illegals, gun control, anti development, anti death penalty.


Candidates like Kaine never win in Virginia. He has the politics of Howard Dean.


For Kaine to be leading by 2 points in the latest Survey USA poll is very concerning.


Warner won 4 years ago but he wasn't percieved as being a liberal like Kaine is.


If Kaine had run last year he would have lost going away.


34 posted on 10/18/2005 2:00:02 PM PDT by johnmecainrino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Javelina

Wrong tea leaves reading down here. Bringing Clinton in will have a negative effect no matter what the climate is. The things I am upset with Bush on are 1) Illegal Immigration and 2) High Entitlement Spending. (Spending on the war and national security is a good thing and can't be helped. So there is no beef there) These are the things that Kaine stands for and like they are gonna fly with an conservative block of voters who oppose such things. Kaine's death penalty,pro-tax and anti-death penalty stance will kill him. He is to the left of Warner. The only reason Warner is popular because he did nothing in office for the most part and kept the status-quo.

The jury is out on Harriet Miers until I see the hearings. If she is a constructionist and has sound judicial temperament I support her. If she doesn't its thumbs down.


35 posted on 10/18/2005 2:01:13 PM PDT by DarthVader (Liberal Democrats = The Excrement of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: johnmecainrino

Early running an abysmal campaign didn't help.


36 posted on 10/18/2005 2:02:43 PM PDT by DarthVader (Liberal Democrats = The Excrement of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Talon IV

This is a hosed up operation. i couldnt get Missouri to come up.

That said, though, last time they said that 54% of Missourians live in the St. Louis area. No joke.

That of course, is a farce.

Maybe they are factoring in the voter fraud factor now that we have a dim as our secretary of state.


37 posted on 10/18/2005 2:03:52 PM PDT by BoBToMatoE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
I agree he has to get back the base but the '06 elections really are not about Bush and in these elections the politics is all about local issues. When it comes to these races the voters in each state in large measure care about what THEIR official has done or not done and not what the president has done or not done. The presidential election is different and there the issues are national. Bush still has 3 full years to get that part right again.
38 posted on 10/18/2005 2:06:25 PM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

I miss the old days, when Carter clocked in at a whopping 24. So did the BDS infected media.

What was Clinton's low point? Something like 35%. Does anyone have a copy of the state by state?


39 posted on 10/18/2005 2:07:56 PM PDT by Tarpon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loreldan

Those are exactly the numbers I looked at. Interesting.


40 posted on 10/18/2005 2:08:19 PM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

SURVEY USA is a biased polling firm run by libs.

Any Conservative who references them might as well say "According to the NY Times-" before every sentence.


41 posted on 10/18/2005 2:10:07 PM PDT by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Texas Bush 42% 54% -12%

Wow.

42 posted on 10/18/2005 2:10:09 PM PDT by Texas Federalist (qualified to serve on the United States Supreme Court)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnmecainrino

What is disturbing are conservatives who pay attention to Survey USA.

Survey USA stunk up the place in 2004.


43 posted on 10/18/2005 2:11:15 PM PDT by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
WHOOPDEFREEKINDOO!

44 posted on 10/18/2005 2:12:25 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK (secus acutulus exspiro ab Acheron bipes actio absol ab Acheron supplico)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Utah Wins! Yeaaaaaa.......!!!!!!


45 posted on 10/18/2005 2:12:52 PM PDT by Utah Binger (Modernist American Art in the West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

"Survey USA stunk up the place in 2004."

It sure did!


46 posted on 10/18/2005 2:16:22 PM PDT by DarthVader (Liberal Democrats = The Excrement of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Tarpon
What was Clinton's low point? Something like 35%.

And it was because of that low approval rating that Clinton lost both branches of the Congress, the House for the first time in over 40 years. You want that to be Bush's legacy?

47 posted on 10/18/2005 2:18:36 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

Having moved to Kansas about 3 years ago, I've been quite surprised by the politics of Kansas. Kansas is decidedly Republican but not socially conservative. The Kansas Republican Party is divided into the social conservatives (the Brownback wing) and the economic conservatives (the Roberts wing). These two groups dislike and distrust each other. It was the economic conservatives abandoning the social conservative candidate that gave us Democratic Governor Sebilius. If Bush is identified as a social conservative, the economic conservatives will join the Democrats in disapproving of Bush. Given some of the venomous statements that I have heard about Bush from these Country Club Republican, I'm not that surprised by this result.


48 posted on 10/18/2005 2:19:22 PM PDT by CommerceComet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader
Any Conservative who still refers to polls from the biased MSM might as well begin every sentence they speak with phrase "According to the NY Times-".

Translation of my statement above: FAKE NEWS & FAKE POLLS are one in the same.

49 posted on 10/18/2005 2:20:40 PM PDT by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
Clinton's low came in the second term.

Poll-itorials mean little these days. It's just a trick to get you to think Bush is failing. Have a look at the Democrats generic number, it's stands at 31-32%.
50 posted on 10/18/2005 2:28:21 PM PDT by Tarpon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson