Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: P8riot; Joe Brower; Travis McGee; Squantos; El Gato; DMZFrank; Mulder; Billthedrill; ...
It was S. 397 complete with the asinine Gun Lock provision.

Indeed, I just got it from the horse's mouth. "Commenting on the passage of this landmark legislation, NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre said, 'This is an historic victory for the NRA. Freedom, truth and justice prevailed, and today S. 397 is one step closer to becoming the law of the land.'"

We'll have to take some solace in the fact that the NRA is still pushing for shall issue, concealed carry privileges, including Alaska's new concealed carry right, in all states, and uniform state law pre-emption over local gun control laws. Here are references about body armor standards which pertains to the other amendment in S. 397 to study ammo and LEO body armor.

Body Armor Standards and Testing

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bvpbasi/docs/SupplementII_08_12_05.pdf

A half step forward, politics prevailed.

15 posted on 10/20/2005 12:15:12 PM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

Thanks for the ping! Good news!


17 posted on 10/20/2005 12:20:22 PM PDT by NRA2BFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
neverdem said: "A half step forward, politics prevailed."

On the bright side, perhaps someday the Supreme Court will find itself ruling that the trigger-lock provision is an infringement of the Second Amendment. One can hope.

19 posted on 10/20/2005 12:36:21 PM PDT by William Tell (Put the RKBA on the California Constitution - Volunteer through rkba.members.sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Re: The left's efforts to attach the "Armor Piercing Ammo Ban" to this legislation.

During the voting they took a call from a woman in Houston (I believe), that set the record straight concerning "Armor Piercing" ammunition. She stated correctly that if the amendment passed it would've outlawed every "Hi-Powered" hunting rifle round currently in existence in this country.

20 posted on 10/20/2005 12:45:15 PM PDT by P8riot (When they come for your guns, give them the bullets first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
A half step forward, politics prevailed.

Actually a half step forward for the industry, but a step onto the slippery slope towards mandatory trigger lock usage for us.

However there is a little bit more good news. From S 397 as passed.

(a) Findings- Congress finds the following:

(1) The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

(2) The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the rights of individuals, including those who are not members of a militia or engaged in military service or training, to keep and bear arms.

Now that doesn't carry any force of law, it's in the findings, not the parts that will make it into the US Code. However it is something to be cited the next time a law which violates the second amendment is challenged in court.

The down side is that darn trigger lock business, although since in this bill it's not mandatory to actually use them, I guess it doesn't infringe on the right to either keep or bear arms.

22 posted on 10/20/2005 5:22:31 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson