Posted on 10/20/2005 9:56:38 PM PDT by quidnunc
President Hillary will be happy to hear that.
Yeah, I agree but Boxer doesn't have the faintest idea why being called a "snake" is a bad thing, is my point, but she sure does try for mileage by using concepts she abhores.
Snake is satan, being turned into a snake is punishment by God for falling from grace. Somehow hearing Boxer try to capitalize on the concept involved and then say with dark righteousness that she (as does Feinstein say) campaigned upon and was elected to support abortion rights...and then call Republicans "snakes" as if she respects the judgement of God. It's just piling on the blasphemy upon the blasphemous by a blasphemor. Disgusting parody in her statement.
BS.
Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan.
I was wordy, but you have to admit, I made some pretty damned good inferences in the second portion of post #95!
Nobody will buy her book except her echo chamber.
Ai-yai-yai-yai-yai.
You are one confused quisling.
Ai-yai-yai-yai-yai.
You are one confused quisling.
Is He One of Us?"
Only if we're politicians.
Read the article. It defines anti-state and anti-left.
While they're drunk. When they're sober they can be shaky, insecure and passive about things that they used to care about.
AND it's nearly impossible to shut up a drunk while he's drunk.
POTUS is NOT drinking and I'll say it again, it's snarky to give that credence.
So what did you think of my inferences in post 95... pretty straight on, huh?
My thinking too, that with the composition of the SCOTUS at stake, she might be playing her trump cards.
There are illegal aliens in our country from all over the world. There just happen to be more of them using the southern border to do their illegal deeds. And, just because Mexico shares our southern border does not make it alright for people from that land to engage in illegal immigration.
Aplogists for those just want some special privilege for them and damn anyone who raises any questions, much moreso opposition to the exploitation.
Any problems "Mexico" has, it's responsible for. If people are law abiding and honest about who they are and what their intentions are, most Americans, including me, welcome them to the United States and even assist in the process for many.
The issue of Mexico is exploited by some to denigrate Americans. Allows some sort of perceived privilege to ridicule Americans.
Doesn't work since most thinking people know otherwise.
Illegal aliens are responsible for their own behavior and their illegal status is in violation of laws. From wherever they are. But suggesting that holding the majority of offendors responsible represents some sort of undue negativity about them is foolish and it is disrespectful to the very nature of what citizenship means.
deaconjim wrote: "If we are judging him on being a Conservative, he barely passes muster."
I'm really curious how he passes muster. What's your definition of conservative, and how has he met it? Being a Democrat-lite doesn't make someone conservative.
There are illegal aliens in our country from all over the world. There just happen to be more of them using the southern border to do their illegal deeds. And, just because Mexico shares our southern border does not make it alright for people from that land to engage in illegal immigration.
Aplogists for those just want some special privilege for them and damn anyone who raises any questions, much moreso opposition to the exploitation.
Any problems "Mexico" has, it's responsible for. If people are law abiding and honest about who they are and what their intentions are, most Americans, including me, welcome them to the United States and even assist in the process for many.
The issue of Mexico is exploited by some to denigrate Americans. Allows some sort of perceived privilege to ridicule Americans.
Doesn't work since most thinking people know otherwise.
Illegal aliens are responsible for their own behavior and their illegal status is in violation of laws. From wherever they are.
CORRECTION: BUT SUGGESTING THAT NOT HOLDING the majority of offendors responsible represents some sort of undue negativity about them is foolish and it is disrespectful to the very nature of what citizenship means.
Thomas isn't prone to making rash comments. But he has an evil-eye, scornful stare that would do my high-school principle proud.
CORRECTION TWO (last one): BUT SUGGESTING THAT the majority of offendors responsible BE HELD RESPONSIBOLE FOR THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIONS REPRESENTS SOME SORT OF UNDUE NEGATIVITY about them is foolish and it is disrespectful to the very nature of what citizenship means.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.