Oh, I forgot--- it was America's fault.
Posted on 10/21/2005 4:34:10 PM PDT by blogblogginaway
Ok, let me see if I have this straight now. Killing terrorists is ok, burning the dead bodies is not. Kind of irrational reasoning IMO. Also, I think the pentagon spokesman who said the idea was repugnant should have his butt kicked for him along with any other American politician or official that speaks against this Lt. for burning the bodies. Don't want to be burned? Don't be a terrorist, AND don't kill civilians and burn their bodies while they are hanging from a bridge.
Oh, I forgot--- it was America's fault.
How does that explain the bacon that was sizzing on Johnny Taliban?
One more thing to add. This is part of the process of getting people's minds off of the good news coming out of Iraq about the elections and so forth. Can't have people feeling good about the Iraqis starting to govern themselves can we?
Just once I'd like to see an official spokesman say, "Yeah, we burned 'em. So what? Yeah, we flushed their filthy Koran down the toilets. Screw 'em! They murdered 3000 innocent Americans!"
A man can dream. . .
Well, this is a good lesson for our soldiers. If you're going to do something like this, shoot the journalist who is embeded with you first.
LOL! ;)
Yeah .. I wish our kids would realize there are people all around them taking pictures. That's the way it should be, but I think they get wrapped up in the day to day battles and forget there is some guy lurking with a camera.
But .. where was the leadership who allowed them to do this. That guy needs to get off the battlefield.
I'm sorry. I didn't mean to be offensive. I write replies like I would talk to a friend in my kitchen.
And .. here's another one with a snotty remark.
Thanks, but your comment is arrogant!!
Well .. I've seen the video of the area - and it looked to me like there were several places where they could have burried the guys, instead of burning them.
Rocky hills or not - I know what I saw.
I can imagine being there, from past experiences, and given the conditons I would dump fuel on the bodies and burn them just for simple expediency.
"Thanks, but your comment is arrogant!!"
Thanks, but your comment was stupid!!
It was not "stupid" - I saw the video of the location where the body burning took place - there were plenty of places where they could have buried the bodies.
Don't call me stupid just because you are trying to make some arrogant point like I don't know anything.
But .. our military has rules against this .. so why would the leader of the group allow them to do that ..??
We have to fight monsters .. but we don't want to turn our precious warriors into monsters too. Just because the terrorists burned our guys on the bridge in Baghdad, that doesn't make it okay for us to burn them. No matter how much we dislike them. We're there to kill and break things - not become butchers and monsters.
Regardless of whether they were scum or desrved a 21 gun salute, who says that cremation is not respectful?
What next?
"U.S. sailors desecrate body by using it for crab food!!!!"
I am still at a loss as to why the press thinks that burning terrorist corpses is a bad thing.
Of course, I still am wondering why we are not burning live terrorists...
"I love the smell of napalm in the morning!"
If you can't take the heat, stay out of the kitchen.
I really do think it was done for expediency. Bloated, stinking bodies, high heat, other tactical considerations...all conspire to make it far easier to burn them than bury them. I really don't see what the big deal is, the guys were already dead and if some jerk hadn't photographed it, it never happened.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.