Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Whose Agenda are you Parrotting When You Do NOT Support Miers?
Net Searches ^ | October 22, 2005

Posted on 10/22/2005 9:19:11 AM PDT by Calpernia

For those of you promoting the agenda of NOT supporting Harriet Miers, take a look at where you are siding.

Domain Name:BUSHCOMMISSION.ORG

Created On:30-Sep-2005 19:41:00 UTC
Last Updated On:03-Oct-2005 20:48:38 UTC
Expiration Date:30-Sep-2006 19:41:00 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:Tucows Inc. (R11-LROR)
Status:TRANSFER PROHIBITED
Registrant ID:tu65xuClzUJzqkgN
Registrant Name:Charles C. Kissinger

Registrant Organization: Not In Our Name Project

Registrant Street1: EDITED FOR POSTING
Registrant Street2:
Registrant Street3:
Registrant City:Brooklyn
Registrant State/Province:NY
Registrant Postal Code:11217-1112
Registrant Country:US
Registrant Phone:+1.212-EDITED FOR POSTING

Not in Our Name project.

They are SDS/Weatherman.

From FBI Files:

Weatherman or Weather Underground Organization, is a "revolutionary organization of communist men and women" formed by members of the Students for a Democratic Society or SDS. They were originally called the Revolutionary Youth Movement. They advocated the overthrow of our government and capitalism. They carried out a campaign of bombings, jailbreaks, and riots in 1969-1976.

The group derived their name from Bob Dylan's song lyrics from "Subterranean Homesick Blues", which were, "You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows", I use to see that quote at the bottom of their periodical, New Left Notes, when I use to work at a periodical distribution company.

Their first event, in 1969, was the "Days of Rage" in Chicago. They blew up a statue dedicated to police casualties in the 1886 Haymarket Riot. They announced at a convention that they supported Charles Manson. The rally failed to draw as many participants (300) as they had hoped. They did lead a riot through Chicago's business district, smashing windows and cars. 6 were shot and 70 arrested. The conflict went on for a few days.

1970, after the shooting by police of Black Panther Fred Hampton, the group issued a Declaration of War against the United States government, changing its name to the "weather underground organization", adopting fake IDs, and pursuing covert activities only. These initially included plans for a bombing of a US military noncommissioned officers' dance at Fort Dix. But when three Underground members died in an accidental explosion while preparing the bomb in a Greenwich Village, New York City safe house, other cells re-evaluated their plans and decided to pursue only non-lethal projects.

This group released a number of manifestos and declarations, while conducting a series of bombings. These attacked the U.S. Capitol, The Pentagon, police and prison buildings, and the rebuilt Haymarket statue again, among other targets. The group took measures to avoid any loss of life as a result of these bombings, issuing warnings to evacuate the building ahead of time via phone. They also took a $25,000 payment from a drugs group called The Brotherhood of Eternal Love to break LSD advocate Timothy Leary out of prison, transporting him to Algeria. They remained largely successful at avoiding the police and the FBI.

In the mid-to-late 1970s, the group began dissolving, as many members turned themselves in to the police, and others moved onto other armed revolutionary groups. Very few served prison sentences, since the evidence gathered against them, by the FBI's COINTELPRO program, was inadmissable in court, due to the illegal methods used to obtain it.

Famous members of the Weather Underground include Kathy Boudin, Mark Rudd, Terry Robbins, David Gilbert, and the still-married couple Bernardine Dohrn and Bill Ayers.

Many former Weathermen have re-integrated into society, without necessarily repudiating their original intent. Bill Ayers, now a Distinguished Professor of Education at the University of Illinois, said in a September 11, 2001 New York Times profile "I don't regret setting bombs. I believe we didn't do enough."

---------------------------------------------------------

Searches on BUSHCOMMISSION.ORG Database and Files:

>>>>Harriet Miers' deep loyalty to George Bush could lead to her making dangerous interpretations of the Constitution.

>>>>Campaign Manager: Miers "Is On the Extreme End of the Anti-Choice Movement"

>>>Operation Rescue urged rejection of Ms. Miers' candidacy, calling her insufficiently conservative.

>>>>make this a ferocious confirmation battle in the Senate

>>>>show the conservative credentials insufficient for many on the right.

If you aren't supporting Harriet Miers, take some time to do a search of BUSHCOMMISSION.ORG. Not a site search. A search to see where info is pulled from:

http://www.google.com/search?q=%22bushcommission.org%22&hl=en&lr=&filter=0

Make sure if you are not on the side of supporting Miers, it isn't information that came from SDS, Not In Our Name, MoveOn.org, of the NLG.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: auntharriet; georgebush; harrietmiers; jokenominee; miers; miersliars; moveon; nion; nlg; notinourname; quotaqueen; scotus; sds; weatherman; weathermen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 421-427 next last
To: thoughtomator

Robert Blake you mean, not Robert Bork. Get up to date with the MSM ~ no one even remembers who Bork was.


21 posted on 10/22/2005 9:31:18 AM PDT by muawiyah (/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again? How'bout a double sarcasm for this one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

We are siding with our conservative principles. Everything else is "background noise", and should be ignored. It's called character, and my conservative beliefs eclipse my belief in President Bush. He's just a frail fallible human just like the rest of us by the way, and the conservative movement is larger than this President. We have to struggle on while he plans his library in a few years.


22 posted on 10/22/2005 9:32:17 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Who cares? The woman is unqualified for the position and her nomination is an insult to conservatives.


23 posted on 10/22/2005 9:33:02 AM PDT by SFinmate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
One that opposes Harry Reid's agenda? And, Gloria Steinem's? One that opposes quotas and preferrential treatment?

This has to be the dumbest post at FR in a long time. Most liberal groups opposed David Souter when he was nominated, too.

24 posted on 10/22/2005 9:33:14 AM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
True, lawyers can be pretty slimy. My point is, is that her support for the Aristocracy of Quotas is documented and on Record. How many Mayor Nagins and Governor Blancos do we want wielding power in the name of diversity?
25 posted on 10/22/2005 9:33:35 AM PDT by .cnI redruM (Because change is not something you talk into existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Even Harriet Miers wouldn't be convinced by this arguement!


26 posted on 10/22/2005 9:33:55 AM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
"Miers Backed Race, Sex Set-Asides. She Made Diversity A Texas Bar Goal
Washington Post ^ | Saturday, October 22, 2005; Page A01 | By Jo Becker and Sylvia Moreno


Posted on 10/22/2005 8:38:48 AM PDT by .cnI redruM


As president of the State Bar of Texas, Harriet Miers wrote that "our legal community must reflect our population as a whole," and under her leadership the organization embraced racial and gender set-asides and set numerical targets to achieve that goal.

The Supreme Court nominee's words and actions from the early 1990s, when she held key leadership positions as president-elect and president of the state bar, provide the first window into her personal views on affirmative action, an area in which the Supreme Court is closely divided and where Miers could tip the court's balance.


(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ..."

Who do you think you are siding with regarding these facts? It's not the Heritage Foundation I can assure you.
27 posted on 10/22/2005 9:34:56 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Do you realize that all the tactics of the left are now being used by supporters of Miers (I know - not all but enough).

Let's see, we have:
1) Attack the messenger, not the message
2) Guilt by association
3) Guilt by non-association
4) Use emotional arguments rather than arguing substance

This is not DU - pls use relevant arguments rather than this type of BS.
28 posted on 10/22/2005 9:36:49 AM PDT by al_again
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Correct me if I am misunderstanding you but I think that you are arguing that rather than evaluating Harriet Miers on her merits we instead let Moveon.org decide for us by doing the opposite of whatever they do. I can't do that.


29 posted on 10/22/2005 9:37:37 AM PDT by gondramB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest; Calpernia

I'll send the memo to Laura Ingraham....she must be a commie, too....and since I've been agreeing with Laura's statements/comments concerning Miers.....I guess that makes me and at least half her listeners commies, as well.


30 posted on 10/22/2005 9:38:25 AM PDT by nicmarlo (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest; Calpernia

Calpernia was born yesterday, doncha know!

;)


31 posted on 10/22/2005 9:38:42 AM PDT by adam_az (It's the border, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Well, I was leery, but on the fence.

But did you know she supports NUMERICAL QUOTAS?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1507258/posts?page=54#54



32 posted on 10/22/2005 9:38:50 AM PDT by FairOpinion (CA Props: Vote for Reform: YES on 73-78, NO on 79 & 80, NO on Y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SFinmate
It's not an insult to Conservatives. Rather, it's upsetting to those who favor Libertarians, or those who particularly despise heretics.
33 posted on 10/22/2005 9:38:55 AM PDT by muawiyah (/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again? How'bout a double sarcasm for this one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

A typo is when someone spells 'Emglish' instead of 'English.' Using "who's" for 'whose' suggests unfamiliarity with English grammar.

In any case, please inform us whether, had you been a member of the Dallas Bar Association, you would have voted for the resolution "urging Texas law firms to set a goal of hiring one qualified minority lawyer for every 10 new associates."


34 posted on 10/22/2005 9:39:22 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (read my posts on Today show bias at www.newsbusters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

I'm supporting my own agenda.


35 posted on 10/22/2005 9:39:32 AM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al_again
This is not DU - pls use relevant arguments rather than this type of BS.

"You fight with the army you have." — Donald Rumsfeld

36 posted on 10/22/2005 9:39:52 AM PDT by Wormwood (Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

"Get up to date with the MSM ~ no one even remembers who Bork was."

I remember who he was. He was the lousy nominee who didn't think that the 2nd amendment referred to an individual right to own firearms.


37 posted on 10/22/2005 9:40:09 AM PDT by adam_az (It's the border, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

Yeah, if that happens, they might decide to support President Bush. Then where would we be, voting for Kerry?


38 posted on 10/22/2005 9:40:36 AM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner; Calpernia
Yeah, go right after the source. Any comment on Jonah Goldberg or David Frum's position on the Miers nomination?
39 posted on 10/22/2005 9:41:06 AM PDT by .cnI redruM (Because change is not something you talk into existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

I was on that thread. There is not quote supporting quotas. Goals are not quotas.


40 posted on 10/22/2005 9:41:06 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 421-427 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson