Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mystery-Woman Miers (Has Supported ICC, Gay Adoptions, Tax Hikes; Some "Conservative," Huh...?)
World Net Daily ^ | 10/03/2005 | Joseph Farrah

Posted on 10/23/2005 5:34:36 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

WASHINGTON – Harriet Miers, President Bush's nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court to replace Sandra Day O'Connor, is on record as supporting the establishment of the International Criminal Court, homosexual adoptions, a major local tax increase and women in combat, WorldNetDaily has learned.

While some conservative leaders and organizations were stunned by the appointment, most were not alarmed by the lack of a paper trail by the nominee who has never served as a judge at any level.

But a profile of her positions as a leader of the American Bar Association, a Dallas city councilwoman and as presidential counselor is unlikely to ease the concerns of those who were expecting Bush to fulfill his promise to name a justice in the mold of Clarence Thomas or Antonin Scalia.

According to Elaine Donnelly, president of the Center for Military Readiness, Miers has taken positions as White House counsel that violate the law banning women in combat.

"As White House counsel, Ms. Miers either approved of the Department of Defense's illegal assignments of women in units required to be all-male, which is still continuing in violation of the law requiring notice to Congress in advance, or she was oblivious to the legal consequences of those assignments," she said.

Donnelly believes the actions of Miers could lead directly to a future court ruling requiring women to register with the Selective Service for the draft because they are now being, against the wishes of Congress, assigned to land combat.

"I am very disappointed by the president's choice," she said. "Ms. Miers does not have a judicial 'paper trail,' but her record as White House counsel is a legitimate cause for concern. Democrats and liberals who were willing to use the military for purposes of social experimentation have reason to be pleased."

Donnelly also concludes that Miers approved the Bush administrations retention of President Clinton's "don't ask, don't tell" regulations, which, she says, are different from the 1993 law passed by Congress

Meanwhile, during Miers long affiliation with the American Bar Association, she submitted a 1999 report to the ABA's house of delegates that included recommendations to develop and establish an International Criminal Court and the enactment of laws and public policy providing that the sexual orientation of adults be no bar to adoption of children.

Under the heading Family Law and subheading Adoption, the document states: "Supports the enactment of laws and public policy which provide that sexual orientation shall not be a bar to adoption when the adoption is determined to be in the best interest of the child."

Also included, under the heading International Law and Practice, is a recommendation for "the development and establishment of an International Criminal Court."

Along with the proposed agenda was a memo, dated Oct. 28, 1998, that explained the document.

"The Committee urges all Delegates to review this list for items of interest to their constituencies, and to act as the catalyst for further contact and action so that each entity will have the earliest opportunity for consideration and input."

The memo is signed by Miers as chairwoman of the Select Committee of the House.

As a city councilwoman, Miers also said Dallas had a responsibility to pay for AIDS education and patient services. And she courted the support of the Lesbian/Gay Coalition of Dallas in her successful 1989 campaign.

In addition, economic conservatives pleased by her corporate law background may find it distressing that in 1990 Miers voted for a 7 percent property tax increase during her short tenure on the Dallas City Council.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: allhailharriet; betrayingthebase; bowbeforeharriet; bushbotbait; bushbotchorus; cmr; cronypick; daffyduck; dissingthebase; elainedonnelly; falsearticle; farahisnuts; farahlies; gayadoption; gaymarriage; harrietakbar; harrietdroids; harrietmiers; harrietshumanshields; homosexualagenda; josephfarrah; justicemiers; lies; miers; moonbats; nutcaseposting; quotaqueen; repostedarticle; saintharriet; scotus; souterinadress; stiffingthebase; stoptheinsanity; taxhikes; trustbutverify; trustme; womenincombat; worldnutdaily; worshipharriet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 301-311 next last

1 posted on 10/23/2005 5:34:38 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
IGNORE this article. There's nothing to see here, move along now.

Bush said, "Trust me."
We must trust, we must trust, we must trust, we must trust........

/s

2 posted on 10/23/2005 5:46:17 AM PDT by Condor51 (Leftists are moral and intellectual parasites - Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

"she submitted a 1999 report to the ABA's house of delegates that included recommendations to develop and establish an International Criminal Court"

If that proves to be true, that has to be the last straw on this nomination.

It's as if Bush is trying to force conservatives to the Constitution Party in 2008.


3 posted on 10/23/2005 5:46:40 AM PDT by nj26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

These are not the droids you are looking for.


4 posted on 10/23/2005 5:48:09 AM PDT by counterpunch (SCOTUS interruptus - withdraw Miers now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
He really does not like Miers. He has influence with Rush Limbaugh since he ghosted Limbaugh's first book (or so I have read). The question remains is Farrah speaking for himself only or others or conservatives in general.

Like Limbaugh, Frum, Noonan, Rich, Krauthammer et al, Farrah makes a good living telling others what is what. Now the question is, whether what he believes and advocates is anyone's best interest other than a narrow group of pundits who hate Mies since the President did not seek their counsel in the selection process.

About 22% of the people who vote Republican in Minnesota consistently say that the reason they do so is on the basis of moral and traditional values. I do not believe any of the above mentioned pundits speaks for them or even approves of them. Running beneath the opposition to Miers is a strong feeling that some ignorant, knuckle dragging, Neanderthal Jesus freak does not belong on SCOTUS.

Let Miers speak before the Judiciary Committee and let the Senators vote. After all, was not the pundit mantra "give an up or down vote" the basis for the success of the last nominee?

No rule by philosopher kings! Our US Senators can vote her up or down and then face the electorate. That is the way the Constitution proclaims.

5 posted on 10/23/2005 5:51:40 AM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Combine this with her encouragement of affirmative action and we have a real winner. I'm glad this stuff is coming out now and not 5 years from now in supreme court decisions.
6 posted on 10/23/2005 5:52:34 AM PDT by BinaryBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Outstanding! Not even so much as one single, solitary word of all that dealt with Miers' support for an International Court; her support for major tax hikes; or her support for "normalization" of homosexual adoptions! BRILLIANT -- ! < /sarcasm>
7 posted on 10/23/2005 5:55:11 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("It'sTime for Republicans to Start Toeing the Conservative Line, NOT the Other Way Around!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All

But remember we are just supposed to "trust" Bush on this one.


8 posted on 10/23/2005 5:59:15 AM PDT by markedmannerf (I BELIEVE IN CONGRESSMAN WELDON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Yesterday I moved from I'll-wait-until-the-hearings to NO WAY on Harriet Miers.


9 posted on 10/23/2005 6:01:29 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nj26

The ICC would be a disqualifier for me. I hate that treaty. And the fact that a Spanish judge issued an international arrest warrant (since quashed by grownups) for 3 American soldiers for a friendly fire incident in which they have already been cleared underscores the problem.

She needs to go.


10 posted on 10/23/2005 6:02:17 AM PDT by Patriot from Philly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Already posted and farah has been debunked.

You guys must be desperate when you repost retread articles.

Link

11 posted on 10/23/2005 6:03:22 AM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

It just gets better.


12 posted on 10/23/2005 6:03:37 AM PDT by johnny7 (“What now? Let me tell you what now.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Souter in a skirt


13 posted on 10/23/2005 6:04:36 AM PDT by lormand (Dead people vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane

Thanks, I didn't know that. The ICC is a real deal closer for me.


14 posted on 10/23/2005 6:04:58 AM PDT by Patriot from Philly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Patriot from Philly
The ICC would be a disqualifier for me. I hate that treaty

Now think, I know you can.

Do you think if Harriet Miers was for the ICC that she would work for an administration that gutted it and gave the UN the finger over it.

You guys are getting desperate. You use your brains once in a while.

15 posted on 10/23/2005 6:05:27 AM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

I hear Sununu speaks highly of her.


16 posted on 10/23/2005 6:06:23 AM PDT by johnny7 (“What now? Let me tell you what now.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: markedmannerf

Exactly, what does that say about him if this person has influence on any of his decisions? And the fact that he trusts her and nominated her?


17 posted on 10/23/2005 6:07:50 AM PDT by stopem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
"Outstanding! Not even so much as one single, solitary word of all that dealt with Miers' support for an International Court; her support for major tax hikes; or her support for "normalization" of homosexual adoptions! BRILLIANT -- ! < /sarcasm>

Well, that is what the Senate Judiciary Committee is for--asking these questions. So far they are allegations and it is unclear to me at least whether she supports these things.

Outstanding! You are unwilling to give the President of The United States nominee a fair hearing! Brilliant defense of the Constitution. Rule by Limbaugh et al is your choice of governance. /sarcasm

18 posted on 10/23/2005 6:08:03 AM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Meanwhile, during Miers long affiliation with the American Bar Association, she submitted a 1999 report to the ABA's house of delegates that included recommendations to develop and establish an International Criminal Court and the enactment of laws and public policy providing that the sexual orientation of adults be no bar to adoption of children.

I no longer support Miers and think she should remove herself from consideration. However, I dont see any where in Farrah's lastest trash piece that he has any proof that Miers favored any of these issues. ABA lawyers put them up for a vote. Once they get enough support from the committee, the go to the membership for a vote. Fact that they went up for a vote doesnt mean that Miers personally favored any of these issues. It's similar to certain issues being voted on in the House or Senate that the leadership opposes. What is she supposed to do, resign her position if an issue comes up that she disagrees with? Or should she stay and be influential in preventing their passage?

19 posted on 10/23/2005 6:08:45 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Already posted and farah has been debunked.

Embarrassingly for your baldly stated assertion: there is, in fact, no substantive "debunking" of any of Farrah's points anywhere in the thread cited. Oopsie.

You guys must be desperate when you repost retread articles.

Didn't show up on Search. If the Mods feel it should be removed: I have no hey problema with that.

"Desperate," however, is a term better reserved, I feel, for those so slavish in their need to prove their undying devotion to a political party (rather than conservative political principal, per se), that they ardently champion -- and even lie on behalf of! -- a pro-ICC quota queen for the United States Supreme Court. YMMV, however.

20 posted on 10/23/2005 6:09:40 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("It'sTime for Republicans to Start Toeing the Conservative Line, NOT the Other Way Around!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

NTSA.


21 posted on 10/23/2005 6:10:44 AM PDT by verity (Don't let your children grow up to be mainstream media maggots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Didn't show up on Search

Yeah right, just put in the term "mystery woman" and do the search through the date, and voila this know nothing farah hit piece, but you already knew that.

22 posted on 10/23/2005 6:11:48 AM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
it is unclear to me at least whether she supports these things.

I have absolutely no difficulty believing that statement to be 110% true.

And then some.

23 posted on 10/23/2005 6:11:54 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("It'sTime for Republicans to Start Toeing the Conservative Line, NOT the Other Way Around!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
"I hear Sununu speaks highly of her"

lol

24 posted on 10/23/2005 6:13:21 AM PDT by lormand (Dead people vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dane
but you already knew that.

Either re-read Posting #20, or else go run and fetch A Big Person to do so for you.

25 posted on 10/23/2005 6:14:01 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("It'sTime for Republicans to Start Toeing the Conservative Line, NOT the Other Way Around!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

wow, Bush admin joining the gang of pedophiles and playing with liberal soviet rifraf....this really take the cake...but is not surprizing given the consciouslessness of liberals who give themselves up and commit suicide....why is Bush sleeping with such people he apparently know nothing about (not an excuse)

No sparks in this


26 posted on 10/23/2005 6:14:39 AM PDT by JudgemAll (Condemn me, make me naked and kill me, or be silent for ever on my gun ownership and law enforcement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
that they ardently champion -- and even lie on behalf of! -- a pro-ICC quota queen for the United States Supreme Court.

LOL! Then why is she working for an administartion that effectively neutered the ICC.

Oh BTW, she is more pro-2nd amendment than Bork.

"The same liberties that ensure a free society make the innocent vulnerable to those who prevent rights and privileges and commit senseless and cruel acts," Miers wrote in Texas Lawyer when she was president of the state bar. "Those precious liberties include free speech, freedom to assemble ... access to public places, the right to bear arms and freedom from constant surveillance. "We are not willing to sacrifice these rights because of the acts of maniacs," she concluded.

Harriet Miers, 1992

Link

27 posted on 10/23/2005 6:15:29 AM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Schumer on MTP just said "And I agree with my friends on the right, that we need to know Harriet Miers judicial philosophy." Congratulations Far Right...you just sealed for all time the fact that Chucky Schumer is RIGHT to demand to know the nominees philosophy.


28 posted on 10/23/2005 6:15:37 AM PDT by ez (Extremism, like all else, should be applied in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Debunked?

Didn't see it

29 posted on 10/23/2005 6:15:44 AM PDT by lormand (Dead people vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dane

No matter what you say there were better choices. Whenever liberals choose someone for the Supreme Court that are strong liberals. So why cant Bush pick a strong conservative instead of someone that no one knows anything about and try to make the liberals happy?


30 posted on 10/23/2005 6:16:26 AM PDT by markedmannerf (I BELIEVE IN CONGRESSMAN WELDON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

yep yep yep, sigh....

I'm not giving up on Bush..... and FreeRepublic

.....AND THIS IS PRECISELY WHY HARRIET MUST BE STOPPED!!!!!!

n'ough said.


31 posted on 10/23/2005 6:18:15 AM PDT by JudgemAll (Condemn me, make me naked and kill me, or be silent for ever on my gun ownership and law enforcement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: lormand; Dane
Debunked? Didn't see it

The poster in question has already had that humiliating little fact pointed out. And is busily scampering away from it. :)

32 posted on 10/23/2005 6:18:20 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("It'sTime for Republicans to Start Toeing the Conservative Line, NOT the Other Way Around!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: markedmannerf

Schumer on MTP just said "And I agree with my friends on the right, that we need to know Harriet Miers judicial philosophy." Congratulations Far Right...you just sealed for all time the fact that Chucky Schumer is RIGHT to demand to know the nominees philosophy.


33 posted on 10/23/2005 6:18:39 AM PDT by ez (Extremism, like all else, should be applied in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: markedmannerf
No matter what you say there were better choices.

That's your opinion, you can make your "better" choice when you are on the campaign trail for a year to become President of the United States.

I'll trust Bush rather than some blowhards.

34 posted on 10/23/2005 6:18:44 AM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou

Just as I'm sure Bill Cliton would be a hoot on a night out with the guys hitting the stip clubs, but had no busines being President, Harriet Miers is a nice, intelligent, rather recently converted Evangelical who has no business on SCOTUS. Nothing personal.

I was NO WAY the FIRST DAY.

If we had FR and the internet when Souter was up for nomination, he wouldn't be where he is today!

Two thumbs up for Jim Robinson for giving us a place to vent our facts and frustrations, even if all of us don't toe the party line all the time!


35 posted on 10/23/2005 6:18:56 AM PDT by 308MBR (Walnut stocks with steel buttplates are pretty effective in close quarters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
You're the third one I've noticed saying this since yesterday. You switched because of the affirmative action thing, like the other two I saw?

Anyway, we'll see. Even if the entire base and all the conservative think tanks and journalists oppose her to a man, it's still an uphill job to stop our goofy herd of GOP senators from confirming her.
36 posted on 10/23/2005 6:19:53 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Sorry Starbucks dude, see reply #20.

Of course farah knew that, but conviently left it out.

37 posted on 10/23/2005 6:20:16 AM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Dane

Lawyering is a nasty job... and women doing it, save for genuine counsel, gain little power for much filth...Harriet proves it


38 posted on 10/23/2005 6:21:17 AM PDT by JudgemAll (Condemn me, make me naked and kill me, or be silent for ever on my gun ownership and law enforcement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Reply #20 is mine, cupcake.

Gee... you really aren't much good at this sort of thing, are you...?

39 posted on 10/23/2005 6:21:54 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("It'sTime for Republicans to Start Toeing the Conservative Line, NOT the Other Way Around!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Sorry Starbucks dude, see reply #20

Excuse me reply #19.

40 posted on 10/23/2005 6:22:17 AM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

She's so stealth, even GW didn't know she was a PC liberal.


41 posted on 10/23/2005 6:22:33 AM PDT by NavVet (“Benedict Arnold was wounded in battle fighting for America, but no one remembers him for that.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
"The same liberties that ensure a free society make the innocent vulnerable to those who prevent rights and privileges and commit senseless and cruel acts," Miers wrote in Texas Lawyer when she was president of the state bar. "Those precious liberties include free speech, freedom to assemble ... access to public places, the right to bear arms and freedom from constant surveillance. "We are not willing to sacrifice these rights because of the acts of maniacs," she concluded.

Harriet Miers, 1992

LOL!
Why don't you post her entire quote, rather than edit it to conceal her incompetence?

You are nothing but a cheap propagandist, and you have been exposed!

The same liberties that ensure a free society make the innocent vulnerable to those who prevent rights and privileges and commit senseless and cruel acts. Those precious liberties include free speech, freedom to assemble, freedom of liberties, access to public places, the right to bear arms and freedom from constant surveillance. We are not willing to sacrifice these rights because of the acts of maniacs.

The one part you selectively edited out was "freedom of liberties" because you know just how idiotic, redundant, and meaningless that is. You tried to save Miers the embarrassment, but in the end only embarrassed yourself.
42 posted on 10/23/2005 6:24:15 AM PDT by counterpunch (SCOTUS interruptus - withdraw Miers now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

Anyway, we'll see. Even if the entire base and all the conservative think tanks and journalists oppose her to a man, it's still an uphill job to stop our goofy herd of GOP senators from confirming her



I think I'm gona fly to the carribean for a while until America's elite love affair with nutso liberals bears its nasty stinking fruits and they start deciding to get their a$$e$ and heads screwed on right.


43 posted on 10/23/2005 6:24:17 AM PDT by JudgemAll (Condemn me, make me naked and kill me, or be silent for ever on my gun ownership and law enforcement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: NavVet
She's so stealth, even GW didn't know she was a PC liberal

See reply #27, doesn't seem PC to me.

44 posted on 10/23/2005 6:24:31 AM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Mystery-Woman Miers (Has Supported ICC, Gay Adoptions, Tax Hikes;

She sounds more like a politician than a judge.............

45 posted on 10/23/2005 6:24:49 AM PDT by WhiteGuy (Vote for gridlock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
I'm not sure I follow the rant entirely, but if it wasn't for the support of religious conservatives, her nomination would already be DOA.

I notice your post doesn't refute one of the allegations made in the WND article. Honestly, if you're still supporting Miers at this point, I have just one question. How does the Kool Aid taste?
46 posted on 10/23/2005 6:25:07 AM PDT by NavVet (“Benedict Arnold was wounded in battle fighting for America, but no one remembers him for that.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dane
#19 isn't "rebuttal": it's nothing more than opinion ("I don't see...") and conjecture ("What is she supposed to do...?").

Try again.

47 posted on 10/23/2005 6:26:24 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("It'sTime for Republicans to Start Toeing the Conservative Line, NOT the Other Way Around!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

"Outstanding! You are unwilling to give the President of The United States nominee a fair hearing!"

The President of the United States couldn't afford a potential Souter nominee, and now he's finding that out.


48 posted on 10/23/2005 6:27:22 AM PDT by Rennes Templar ("The future ain't what it used to be".........Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch; Dane
Why don't you post her entire quote, rather than edit it to conceal her incompetence?

OUCH! That one's gonna leave a bruise -- ! :)

49 posted on 10/23/2005 6:27:54 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("It'sTime for Republicans to Start Toeing the Conservative Line, NOT the Other Way Around!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Do you think if Harriet Miers was for the ICC that she would work for an administration that gutted it and gave the UN the finger over it.

Illogical arguments raised solely for convenience. You folks not only speak out of both sides of your mouths, you do it simultaneously without the slightest indication that you hear the strange dissonance that causes the rest of us laugh at you.

Earlier the Miers fanatics were crowing about how her long and intimate work for the uber-liberal ABA meant nothing, that she was easily capable of working, around, and even leading people she personally disagreed with. Now your tack is, "How can you believe she would work for an administration she doesn't agree with?"

50 posted on 10/23/2005 6:30:13 AM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 301-311 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson