Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Crackingham
If a paper trail firmly identifying a nominee as an "originalist," or whatever, is a prerequisite for nomination, then we will never have anyone but judges and law professors as Supreme Court justices.

Is this a backhanded attempt to call some anti-Miers elitist? We know that's just not true.

3 posted on 10/24/2005 9:36:56 AM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TheDon
If a paper trail firmly identifying a nominee as an "originalist," or whatever, is a prerequisite for nomination, then we will never have anyone but judges and law professors as Supreme Court justices.

Is this a backhanded attempt to call some anti-Miers elitist? We know that's just not true.

hardly backhanded. It flat out states the rationale for those who make the charge. In fact, it is patently self evident that, if the formulation is true, then those that hold to this position are absolutely being elitists, in every since of the word.

As to what "we know," I don't think you and I would agree on who "we" are, nor on what anyone can be said to know at this point in the debate. Anyone who claims that they have all the information they'll ever need and refuse to look at any other evidence are just a bit too arrogant and ignorant for my tastes.

Helluva combination.

18 posted on 10/24/2005 10:06:56 AM PDT by Phsstpok (There are lies, damned lies, statistics and presentation graphics, in descending order of truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson