Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senators face off on Miers nod
The Washington Times ^ | 25 October 2005 | Charles Hurt

Posted on 10/24/2005 9:33:30 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher

Senators disagreed yesterday over the Supreme Court prospects for Harriet Miers, with a key Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee saying the nominee would lose a confirmation vote, a prediction dismissed by two of the panel's Republicans, including its chairman.

"If you held the vote today, she would not get a majority either in the Judiciary Committee or on the floor," said Sen. Charles E. Schumer, New York Democrat and one of the committee's most vocal liberals. Mr. Schumer noted that only a handful of Republican senators have endorsed the nominee.

But Chairman Arlen Specter, Pennsylvania Republican, called such statements premature, saying, "There are no votes one way or another."

"I don't think the nomination is in trouble," he said on CBS' "Face the Nation" yesterday. "I believe that the critical part's going to be when she testifies before the committee. We have a Constitution. People ought to follow it, instead of having all of this prejudgment."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; arlenspecter; bushsquagmier; charlieschumer; georgewbush; harrietmiers; miershearings; rino; scotus
When was the last time Specter and Schumer disagreed on anything? :)
1 posted on 10/24/2005 9:33:31 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

"I don't think the nomination is in trouble," he said on CBS' "Face the Nation" yesterday. "I believe that the critical part's going to be when she testifies before the committee. We have a Constitution. People ought to follow it, instead of having all of this prejudgment."


Hell must have just frozen over. Spector and I finally agree.


2 posted on 10/24/2005 9:35:41 PM PDT by HelloooClareece (Anagram of New York Times....... Monkeys Write. (I Still have a water bucket))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HelloooClareece

Just think how I feel. I never thought I'd agreed with Charles "Chuck" Schumer in a million years. Now we're really talking a blizzard in Satanland.


3 posted on 10/24/2005 9:38:24 PM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Luke21

Some times we are really stupid. All the Rats had to do to kill Miers was to have dirty Harry say he liked her.

We walked right into the trap, we just don`t know it yet

Once the hearings start, watch Chuckie keep reminding us that R`s don`t agree with GWB


4 posted on 10/24/2005 10:58:56 PM PDT by bybybill (remember, the fish come first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Luke21

Just think how I feel. I never thought I'd agreed with Charles "Chuck" Schumer in a million years. Now we're really talking a blizzard in Satanland.

LMAO!


5 posted on 10/24/2005 11:33:35 PM PDT by HelloooClareece (Anagram of New York Times....... Monkeys Write. (I Still have a water bucket))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson