Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

All livestock to be registered with state [WI-Yes, fish too]
Wisconsin News ^ | 10-25-05 | Brian Bridgeford

Posted on 10/25/2005 6:59:42 PM PDT by SJackson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: SJackson

Just more of the same of big government socialism and control of your life and property.

Only the people can stop it.


21 posted on 10/25/2005 7:21:26 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
Anyone heard of this in other states?

Yes, projects of this type are discussed openly in Industry Trade magazines and newsletters.

Actually the Animal ID project is a compromise offered since the cattle industry especailly is opposed to the Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) many are pushing.

I know it sounds crazy to people who don't grow animals for human consumption, but I happen to subscribe to the theory that everyone deserves to know where the meat they purchase at the Supermarket comes from.

As environmental regulations become more stringent all the time, the livestock industry is moving out of the U.S. into Mexico and Brazil.

In the U.S. livestock diets are more restricted than humans. There are many growth promotants and veterinary vaccines which are commonly used outside the U.S. which the Food and Drug Administration has decided to outlaw here. In the case of outlawed antibiotics, the reasoning for banning the antibiotic is to help prevent humans building up a resistance to them. It is for our own good health that these vaccines are not available to livestock producers to use on their herds. Yet these same vaccines are commonly used in other countries.

This is why I feel it is extremely important that we all know where our food is grown. The COOL legislation would have helped us in that way. Unfortunately there were powerful infulences within the industry (maybe packers who also own livestock???) who were able to stall the COOL legislation. The Animal ID project is the compromise substitute.

Most responsible livestock producers I know are not going to complain too much about it, until they start publishing the information in the newspaper. Then all HELL will break loose.

22 posted on 10/25/2005 7:24:28 PM PDT by Iowa Granny (I am not the sharpest pin in the cushion but I can draw blood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple
This needs to be stopped in WI NOW or it will grow like a cancer across the country. Your "right to privacy" protected by the constitution?? -- Not it you don't fight for it!!
23 posted on 10/25/2005 7:26:18 PM PDT by xcamel (No more RINOS - Not Now, Not Ever Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny

I don't see it as odd for livestock raised for consumption...

What seems odd is that they have broadened it to animals that are essentially pets such as horses and llamas and the like.


24 posted on 10/25/2005 7:28:03 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog (Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
This is incredible. A state is going to keep track of all domestic animals and pets in a state and yet they can't keep track of illegal aliens or sexual predators! Talk about misplaced priorities.
25 posted on 10/25/2005 7:31:10 PM PDT by Citizen Tom Paine (An old sailor sends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ikka
I heard about a push at the Federal level to have all livestock tagged with RFID tags. But don't know how far along that is...

Look here. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/lpa/issues/issues.html

26 posted on 10/25/2005 7:32:27 PM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

But it's for your own good. For the love of God, think of the children. LOL


27 posted on 10/25/2005 7:36:11 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

"Your papers, please.

Sir, it appears that your papers are not in order.

Come with me."


28 posted on 10/25/2005 7:40:45 PM PDT by henderson field
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caisson71

Another part of the business development plan for government.


29 posted on 10/25/2005 7:41:44 PM PDT by henderson field
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Tom Paine
A state is going to keep track of all domestic animals and pets in a state and yet they can't keep track of illegal aliens or sexual predators!

I haven't read the Wisconsin law, but if it's like the ones I've read about in the trade magazines they will be required to register the farm the animals are on, not each individual animal.

It is not unusual in the midwest for a farm family to piece together their land holdings over the years they are farming, so all the land isn't necessarily contiguious. The purpose of the bills I know about is to identify 'where' the animals are raised. Which is why I am concerned about the bureaucrats publishing the information and letting PETA and ALF have access to it.

30 posted on 10/25/2005 7:41:56 PM PDT by Iowa Granny (I am not the sharpest pin in the cushion but I can draw blood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Tom Paine
This is incredible. A state is going to keep track of all domestic animals and pets in a state and yet they can't keep track of illegal aliens or sexual predators! Talk about misplaced priorities

Illegals that enter Wisconsin will be issued a cow, for tracking purposes. Predators, I'm not speculating on that.

31 posted on 10/25/2005 7:42:22 PM PDT by SJackson (God isn`t dead. We just can`t talk to Him in the classroom anymore, R Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Notice how many freedoms are being impinged on in the name of public health? Be it gun bans, ATV regs, or whatever, when a public health concern is expressed an attack on freedoms is sure to follow.


32 posted on 10/25/2005 7:42:31 PM PDT by Buzwardo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Wait until the mental giants in "Sandal City" aka Madison figure out that fish "poop" in the water.

Next thing Ban fish!


33 posted on 10/25/2005 7:43:10 PM PDT by TaMoDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple

Of course we'll need to tatoo the animals for identification...and then the humans too.
This is nothing new, it's been done before.


34 posted on 10/25/2005 7:43:24 PM PDT by henderson field
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Borrowed from http://orangecow.org/pythonet/sketches/fish.htm


Praline: (whistles a bit, then) Hello. I would like to buy a fish license, please.

Postal clerk: A what?

Praline: A license for my pet fish, Eric.

Clerk: How did you know my name was Eric?

Praline: No, no, no! My fish's name is Eric. Eric fish. He's an halibut.

Clerk: What?

Praline: He is an halibut.

Clerk: You've got a pet halibut?

Praline: Yes, I chose him out of thousands. I didn't like the others, they were all too flat.

Clerk: You must be a loony.

Praline: I am not a loony. Why should I be tarred with the epithet 'loony' merely because I have a pet halibut? I've heard tell that Sir Gerald Nabarro has a pet prawn called Simon - you wouldn't call him a loony! Furthermore Dawn Pathorpe, the lady show jumper, had a clam called Stafford, after the late chancellor. Alan Bullock has two pikes, both called Chris, and Marcel Proust had an 'addock! So if you're calling the author of 'A la recherche de temps perdu' a loony, I shall have to ask you to step outside!

Clerk: All right, all right, all right. A license?

Praline: Yes!

Clerk: For a fish.

Praline: Yes!

Clerk: You *are* a loony.

Praline: Look, it's a bleeding pet, isn't it? I've got a license for me pet dog Eric, I've got a license for me pet cat Eric.

Clerk: You don't need a license for your cat.

Praline: I bleedin' well do and I've got one! Can't be caught out there!

Clerk: There is no such thing as a bloody Cat license.

Praline: Yes there is.

Clerk: No there isn't.

Praline: Is!

Clerk: Isn't!

Praline: Is!

Clerk: Isn't!

Praline: Is!

Clerk: Isn't!

Praline: Is!

Clerk: Isn't!

Praline: Is!

Clerk: Isn't!

Praline: Is!

Clerk: Isn't!

Praline: What's that then?

Clerk: This is a dog license with the word 'dog' crossed out and 'cat' written in, in crayon.

Praline: Man didn't have the right form.

Clerk: What man?

Praline: The man from the cat detector van.

Clerk: The loony detector van, you mean.

Praline: Look, it's people like you what cause unrest.

Clerk: What cat detector van?

Praline: The cat detector van from the Ministry of Housinge.

Clerk: Housinge?

Praline: It was spelt like that on the van. I'm very observant. I never seen so many bleedin' aerials. The man said their equipment could pinpoint a purr at four hundred yards, and Eric being such a happy cat was a piece of cake.

Clerk: How much did you pay for this?

Praline: Sixty quid and eight for the fruit-bat.

Clerk: What fruit-bat?

Praline: Eric the fruit-bat.

Clerk: Are all your pets called Eric?

Praline: There's nothing so odd about that. Kemel Attaturk had an entire menagerie called Abdul.

Clerk: No he didn't.

Praline: Did!

Clerk: Didn't!

Praline: Did, did, did, did, did and did!

Clerk: Oh all right.

Praline: Spoken like a gentleman, sir. Now, are you going to give me a fish license?

Clerk: I promise you that there is no such thing. You don't need one.

NB: The TV Version continues.....the album version continues below

Praline: Then I would like a statement to that effect signed by the Lord Mayor.

(Fanfare of trumpets. Mayor gorgeously dressed with dignitaries enters flanked by trumpeters.)

Clerk: You're in luck.

(In long shot now. The Mayor, who is nine foot high, and dignitaries approach a startled Praline. Organ music below a reverent voice over)


TV Version finishes - continuation of Album Version


Praline: In that case give me a bee license.

Clerk: A license for your pet bee.

Praline: Correct.

Clerk: Called Eric? Eric the bee?

Praline: No.

Clerk: No?

Praline: No, Eric the half bee. He had an accident.

Clerk: You're off your chump.

Praline: Look, if you intend by that utilization of an obscure colloquialism to imply that my sanity is not up to scratch, or even to deny the semi-existence of my little chum Eric the half bee, I shall have to ask you to listen to this. Take it away, Eric the orchestra-leader.

Singer: A one, two, a one two three four!

Praline (sings):

Half a bee, philosophically,
Must, ipso facto, half not be.
But half the bee has got to be
Vis a vis, its entity. D'you see?

But can a bee be said to be
Or not to be an entire bee
When half the bee is not a bee
Due to some ancient injury?

Chorus: La dee dee, one two three,
Eric the half a bee.
A B C D E F G,
Eric the half a bee.

Praline: Is this wretched demi-bee,
Half-asleep upon my knee,
Some freak from a menagerie?
No! It's Eric the half a bee!

Chorus: Fiddle de dum, Fiddle de dee,
Eric the half a bee.
Ho ho ho, tee hee hee,
Eric the half a bee.

Praline: I love this hive, implore ye-ee,
Bisected accidentally,
One summer afternoon by me,
I love him carnally.

Chorus: He loves him carnally,
Semi-carnally.


Praline: The end.

Clerk: Cyril Connolly?

Praline: No, semi-carnally!

Clerk: Oh.

Chorus: Cyril Connolly. (Whistle end of tune.)


35 posted on 10/25/2005 7:44:17 PM PDT by MarkL (I didn't get to where I am today by worrying about what I'd feel like tomorrow!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TaMoDee

I feed the fish here in the lake. Will I be taxed on my pets?


36 posted on 10/25/2005 7:45:34 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Inge_CAV
Wonder when it will dawn on those bastards that a paper check or a plastic credit card will not cook into a meal.......

But the government can't allow you to be able to feed yourself and your family directly.

How can they force you to follow their directives if they can't starve you, sort of like the way the USSR did with the Ukraine!

Mark

37 posted on 10/25/2005 7:46:10 PM PDT by MarkL (I didn't get to where I am today by worrying about what I'd feel like tomorrow!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

I guess I can add one more reason to be happy that I don't have crabs.


38 posted on 10/25/2005 7:47:13 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
''No, no, Your Honour. I accused this bureaucrat of f****** with my chickens.''
39 posted on 10/25/2005 7:47:40 PM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple
Livestock will be redefined to include humans.

Sheeple.

40 posted on 10/25/2005 7:50:37 PM PDT by SouthTexas (Texans vote FOR prop 2, Nov 8th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson