Skip to comments.
If America invades Iran: Price of oil per barrel will approach $150, warns Iranian diplomat
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2005\10\27\story_27-10-2005_pg7_36 ^
Posted on 10/26/2005 3:29:38 PM PDT by markedmannerf
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
To: marron
And, if past is prologue, the price spike would spur development of new alternative energy sources, plus more efficient energy use. The result would be new record-low oil prices, just in time for Iran to get back into the market.
To: RockinRight
Worldwide oil supplies are tight right now due to increased demand from emerging countries like India and China. Markets for refined products may be even tighter. If Iran should hold back its contribution, say 3-4 million barrels per day out of the approximately 82-84 being produced now, prices will climb significantly.
In addition, and perhaps more important, Iran may close or try to close the Straits of Hormuz to all naval traffic. The U.S. would obviously try to prevent this, but the Iranians have Russian-made and very lethal Sunburn shore to ship missiles.
If the Iranians were successful, Saudi, Kuwaiti, Iraqi and Emirates oil would not flow out. That is a huge, huge percentage of the world supply of oil and refined products.
Even the threat of military action in the Gulf and Straits of Hormuz might make insurance on marine shipments either too costly for most or just completely unavailable.
To: oceanagirl
If only we could nuke 'em and be done with it.
23
posted on
10/26/2005 3:45:26 PM PDT
by
RockinRight
(I am beginning to think conservatism is buried somewhere under New Orleans' mud...)
To: RockinRight
No dhimmitude for oil!
To: markedmannerf
Sounds like a bargain. Let's Roll!
25
posted on
10/26/2005 3:49:31 PM PDT
by
TADSLOS
(Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
To: markedmannerf
I support war against Iran... for oil
To: markedmannerf
I think we've seen the end of invading or occupying Arab states. A couple of strategically dropped bombs would shut down their ports, thus shutting down their oil revenue.
27
posted on
10/26/2005 3:51:35 PM PDT
by
FLCowboy,
(Hillary is changing her colors. She's a chameleon. No, she's a liberal.)
To: markedmannerf
Price of oil per barrel will approach $150, warns Iranian diplomat.Not if we take it. What is it the Left always says? "It's all about oil?"
28
posted on
10/26/2005 3:51:44 PM PDT
by
luvbach1
(Near the belly of the beast in San Diego)
To: RockinRight
good question? But if we invade the price will be a BIG FAT $0
29
posted on
10/26/2005 3:52:00 PM PDT
by
markedmannerf
(I BELIEVE IN CONGRESSMAN WELDON!)
To: RockinRight
good question? But if we invade the price will be a BIG FAT $0
30
posted on
10/26/2005 3:52:00 PM PDT
by
markedmannerf
(I BELIEVE IN CONGRESSMAN WELDON!)
To: RightWhale
"If we invade Russia and Norway, and Venezuela and Iran at the same time oil will go to $1000 a barrel."
And if we drop nuclear weapons on our own refineries, gasoline will cost $12,000/gal. And if aliens from the 12th dimension turn the moon into jello...
31
posted on
10/26/2005 3:53:18 PM PDT
by
NJ_gent
(Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.)
To: oceanagirl
In addition, and perhaps more important, Iran may close or try to close the Straits of Hormuz to all naval traffic. The U.S. would obviously try to prevent this, but the Iranians have Russian-made and very lethal Sunburn shore to ship missiles.
I predict their control of the strait would last about 15 minutes.
To: markedmannerf
Three points. First, Iran exports 2.6 million barrels of oil per day. This is a pimple on the butt of world oil supply. Second, if oil goes to $150 per barrel then even more incentive will exist for the development of alternatives; an endeavor which is going full speed ahead as the world has come to realize that the Mideast cannot be relied upon because of the demonstrated inability of Islam to coexist with the world at large. And third, Iran's nuclear facilities can, and will, be taken out without one American boot hitting the ground.
33
posted on
10/26/2005 4:01:58 PM PDT
by
layman
(Card Carrying Infidel)
To: markedmannerf
We will not develop nuclear weapons, the Iranian diplomat pledged. We honour our word.
You are a muslim, and as a muslim is acceptable to lie to an infidel. You are a liar.
34
posted on
10/26/2005 4:05:20 PM PDT
by
reagan_fanatic
(Darwinism is a belief in the meaninglessness of existence - R. Kirk)
To: oceanagirl
In addition, and perhaps more important, Iran may close or try to close the Straits of Hormuz to all naval traffic. The U.S. would obviously try to prevent this, but the Iranians have Russian-made and very lethal Sunburn shore to ship missiles. In an invasion scenario this woul be a very short term threat.
35
posted on
10/26/2005 4:07:46 PM PDT
by
Jalapeno
To: markedmannerf
Yah but the price of lampshades should plummet.
36
posted on
10/26/2005 4:12:05 PM PDT
by
festus
(The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
To: markedmannerf
A $150 bbl spot price for crude is going to trash the European, Chinese and Japanese economies, whereas ours would merely be damaged.
If this guy is right, and frankly I doubt it, it would be a relatively small price to pay for the realignment which would ultimately result.
Is he trying to talk us into this, or what?
* snicker *
To: markedmannerf
Someday, the price of crude oil may be $150 a barrel.
But not in the near future. When oil reaches $80-100 per barrel, it shall be amazing how many sources of oil suddenly appear, and once that spigot is opened, the threat of an oil embargo against the US becomes moot.
Oil is a fungible commodity, and does not care who uses it. There are, already, a number of substitute sources that could come on line and be up to speed rapidly, with a significant number of additional sources being added over a period of a year or two afterward. Once Iran is removed as a source, it may have extreme difficulty recovering its old markets without deeply discounting their product to gain market share back.
The US can make a synthetic substitute (from turkey offal) for crude petroleum right now, and at a cost highly competitive around $60 a barrel. At $80 a barrel, there will be great incentive to apply recently developed technology to recovery of petroleum from oil shale, coal deposits, and reformation of natural gas into many of the lighter fractions of petroleum.
And there is an enormously abundant source of natural gas, from harvest of Methane Hydrate from the ocean floor.
http://www.ncseonline.org/NLE/CRSreports/energy/eng-46.cfm?&CFID=1919958&CFTOKEN=24414047
38
posted on
10/26/2005 4:16:59 PM PDT
by
alloysteel
(Payback and reality may not be related, but they can both be a b*tch.)
To: markedmannerf
Hmm...$150/gal to drop the hammer on a few of those arrogant SOB's? There must be a negative side to this...
To: marron
40
posted on
10/26/2005 4:31:19 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson