Skip to comments.Sex-Selection by Embryo Screening Approved for US Trial
Posted on 10/27/2005 7:20:09 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
HOUSTON, October 27, 2005 (LifeSiteNews.com) - An experiment has been underway for a month in a Houston Texas where parents are permitted to ask scientists for a child with the gender of their choice. The procedure involves preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) which is able to detect the sex of embryos created by in vitro fertilization (IVF) prior to their implantation in their mothers' wombs.
While sex selection via PGD has been allowed in some cases where sex-linked diseases are concerned, the clinical trial is seeking to gage the impact of sex selection at the whim of the parents. According to the journal Nature, the researchers, led by Sandra Carlson of Baylor College of Medicine, will be studying the long term health effect to the children born after PGD and also the social impact on the families.
The fundamental ethical problems behind PGD lie in its origin of IVF which creates children outside of the loving union of a man and a woman. Moreover, the lives of the embryonic children conceived by the IVF procedure are under severe threat since the latest statistics have revealed that over 85% of embryos transferred in the procedure die in the process.
However, with those arguments ignored, and IVF accepted as a moral procedure in most of the world, researchers are left looking at PGD as perhaps problematic since it may cause sex discrimination as is the case in China and India. Both countries have seen a discrepancy in the ratio of boys and girls born since one-child policies and discrimination against female children have resulted in abortion being used to eliminate female babies in utero.
PGD sex selection is banned in Canada, Britain and several other countries for that reason. However the researchers are suggesting sex selection may be ethical for 'family balancing'. The researchers have said they will only accept couples into the trial who have a child and want another child of the opposite sex.
PGD is already routinely used to screen out embryos with genetic defects. Thus those embryonic children with disabilities are disposed of (read killed) prior to being given a chance to be born, a fact which has been of serious concern to groups advocating for the disabled.
Would that ever put the breaks on population growth - there would be a 4/1 male/female ratio within a generation.
I guess a whole series of hurricanes didn't convey the message clearly.
Wow! I can only say there is much in this world that I do not recognize anymore.
It is a brave new world. :-(
You'll appreciate this. As a homeschooling mom, I share current events with our sons every day. One of them commented today, "Mom, it's like every day there is something that is worse and worse...like getting hit with another cannonball every morning." We've started praying about these types of stories.
God help us.
What are these people thinking? Do they not realize that God has the power over life and death? Whatever fits their convenient and happy lifestyles I guess.
Well y'all can think what you want about the article and the concepts therein, but this statement is outrageously ignorant and offensive to those MARRIED couples who have been blessed with children through IVF. Why the assumption that the children conceived aren't out of "the loving union of a man and a woman"?
As far as gender selection, the article did say that it's reserved for couples who already have a child of the other gender. So why all the chicken littles around here?
The technology, like ANY technology, can be used for great good. And like ANY technology, it can be abused. That doesn't mean to eradicate technology, like the Amish...
He does. And in His absolute authority, He has permitted that man can create life outside of the normal reproductive means, for those who are unable. Is that a problem for you?
Absolutely. Just because MAN has the technology or power to do something does not mean it is the right thing to do.
So you're blindly desiring to end IVF altogether, or are you referring to gender selection?
Even after having spent a gruelling 18 months and nearly $30,000 on an adoption, I still feel glad we did not go the IVF route.
There are hundreds of thousands of children in the world who desparately need families, and you don't have to create a batch of microscopic snowflake offspring to poke, prod, sort, and discard in order to choose whether you want a boy or a girl.
Both, and no I am not blind.
If you can't see that then you are self-righteously blind
I never said I don't value girl children. I said that the technology isn't necessarily evil in and of itself. It can be used for evil, but the technology itself isn't. For couples that want another gender from the one they already have, there isn't a problem. This isn't China
Yawn.......do they perceive their children as a gift from God or a gift from their doctor?
This is no different.
Don't speak in the name of the Lord with such hate for fellow man and Christians.
Your ignorance is boring, thanks for the yawn, hypocrite.
They won't. Widows and orphans aren't a priority of the GOP, sadly...
God Bless you too!
Cool! Pretty soon we'll be just like China! < /sarcasm >
Doesn't mean much to say, after you've basically condemned every Christian who has had IVF, hypocrite...
"The procedure involves preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) which is able to detect the sex of embryos created by in vitro fertilization (IVF) prior to their implantation in their mothers' wombs." But But But ... you mean these 'undifferentiated cells' have already differentiated to express male or female direction in their lifetime? Why you could knock me down with a feather! You mean the leftist craptittutes have been lying to US? ... (/sarcasm) The death and exploitation of the youngest humans industry is completely founded on lies, lies the liberal public are willing to keep swallowing in order to indulge their magic thinking.
PGD is often done in IVF and it is helping couples have children. Testing the embryo, and now even the egg before conception is becoming a fantastic way to predict the potential birth of a much-wanted baby! They can't help but know the sex of an embryo when it is used, of course.
This is not really such a Brave New World scenario. They are seeing what life will be like for families who have children on one gender and would like to try parenting the other kind, but wouldn't like to go it naturally and wait for the 8th child. I don't have a problem with it. As long as they donate any unwanted embryos to the infertile couples waiting on long lists to adopt embryos.
This orginally started with parent's trying to avoid sex linked diseases. I have no problem with that, but when it goes to family "balancing" and stuff it gets a little iffy. But then it is probably cheaper in the long run for a family than those who choose to have 5 + children hoping to finally get a boy. When I see that I always wonder if the father takes the saying that "baby girls are God's punishment for the father's teen years" to heart.
Well on this issue, it's not the same as abortion. If they want a girl after so many boys, I don't see anything wrong with that.
**Further down the slippery slope we slide...**
Lord have mercy!
Christ have mercy!
Lord have mercy!
Exactly. Thank you for voicing words of sanity. I thought I was alone here...
And you think this is ANY technology? Does ANY technology murder so many human beings?
This is all indicative of selfishness on the part of mankind. Sadly, men and women do not seem to be able to accept the will of God.
May they be forgiven for these connivings.
Bad bad bad bad bad idea! Very bad.
You spittled out, "He (GOD) has permitted that man can ...", and then you infer that 'can' means should. Do you understand that murder is something man 'can' do but God frowns upon? No, you can't see that clearly ... those who have eyes to see and all that. Eat you chicken little meals now.
If they donate the embryos, then that would be the ideal way to go. If they don't, well, I can't stop people from killing, smoking, having unsafe sex, etc... It's a sinful world, haven't you realized that yet?
The will of God is that such technology exists to help the infertile. Can you accept the will of God?
""85% of embryos transferred in the procedure die in the process.""
""However, with those [above argument] ignored, and IVF accepted as a moral procedure in most of the world,""
Go, run now and throw away all your kitchen knives!!!! People use them to kill!!!!
There's a $10,360 tax credit for adoption, and a $5,000 tax-deductable subsidy available through an employer via some corporate tax incentives. Other adoption expenses are not tax deductable, though, so the remaining $15,000+ we'll be paying with after-tax dollars.
IVF has blessed countless millions, including Christians, who are infertile. Just because it can be used to murder, doesn't make the technology evil. Do you own a gun? They're used to murder, y'know. But we shouldn't go outlawing guns.
So what about a man who marries a woman who has her tubes tied during a previous marriage.. a marriage that didnt even end on her accord.
Should her husband only have to be someone who's had children or doesn't care about children?
Should that man select surgery for his wife that could endanger her?
Or do you think it would be ok with God after much prayer and thought that God would say it's ok to have a child this way.
Remember man can do great evil with technology.. but not all technology is used for evil.
Don't be blanket in all your statements. God is loving.. and he does command that we not all be as judgemental as you currently are.
He can't help judging. God has sent him to judge. Oh wait, Jesus said, judge not, lest you be judged. I guess he doesn't really know the true heart of Jesus...
My my, you do babble don'tchaknow. You appear quite learned in the lieberal art of twisting and dissembling (you even contradict yourself from sentence to sentence; astounding deceitful dexterity that). You won't be happy here at FR. We tend to be pro-life. Need an explanation of what that means?
Care to write another adjective-filled dissertation?
Typicasl lieberal lickspittle, taking a sentence from Scripture out of context and twisting it to fit the lieberal way: "Oh wait, Jesus said, judge not, lest you be judged. I guess he doesn't really know the true heart of Jesus..." And you assume to know? Bwahahahahaha
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.