Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Red Cross Drinking ACLU Kool-Aide?
vanity | 10.28.05 | Mad Dawg

Posted on 10/28/2005 7:29:37 AM PDT by Mad Dawg

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
I can see prohibiting actual services on site. But announcements of bus rides? Anybody else see anything wrong with this or have I just lost all perspective?
1 posted on 10/28/2005 7:29:38 AM PDT by Mad Dawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg

The Red Cross is following the United Way's leadership in driving everyone away.


2 posted on 10/28/2005 7:33:12 AM PDT by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg

We had hurricane evacuees here. A local Christian outreach group was helping to organize and distribute donations. They wore T-shirts bearing the name of the group with "Christian" in the name. A Red Cross worker told them they had to put on different T-shirts, that the word "Christian" might be offensive. They refused and were allowed to continue helping.


3 posted on 10/28/2005 7:33:14 AM PDT by SittinYonder (Flea, feather, bird, egg, nest, twig, branch, limb, tree, and the bog down in the valley - o.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg
More silliness from the Red Plus Sign. That's why the Salvation Army got my money for Hurricane Katrina relief.
4 posted on 10/28/2005 7:34:46 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (We were promised someone in the Scalia/Thomas mold. Maybe <strike>next</strike> this time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg

Irony. It's so deliciously ironic.


5 posted on 10/28/2005 7:34:58 AM PDT by Constitution Day (When life gives you lemons... Just shut up and eat your damn lemons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

Screw the Red Cross. They used millions in 9/11 donations to update their network. They will not get my money again.


6 posted on 10/28/2005 7:35:54 AM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder

Christians 1: RC 0.


7 posted on 10/28/2005 7:36:35 AM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gathersnomoss

That's exactly why I donated to the Salvation Army after Katrina when I could help it. There was stuff through work that went to the Red Cross, but any time I call on my own, it will be to the Salvation Army for now. Just hearing too many stories about the Red Cross lately.


8 posted on 10/28/2005 7:42:55 AM PDT by ark_girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg
The Red Cross is one of the most viciously anti-Semitic organizations in the US and is firmly under the control of Islamofacists. It refuses to recognize or coordinate relief efforts with Israel's Red Star of David "until the occupation of Palestine is over." That pretty much says it all.

Do NOT give to the hate-mongers at the Red Cross. Give to the Salvation Army, a non-political group that takes just 13% of donations for operating costs. The Red Cross and United Way (ready for this?) keep up to 85% of donations for operating costs. Oh. The United Way also gives to The Brady Bunch for gun confiscation.

9 posted on 10/28/2005 7:45:22 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg

Isn't leftism grand...


10 posted on 10/28/2005 7:45:38 AM PDT by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg
Anybody else see anything wrong with this or have I just lost all perspective?

It's totally wrong ... and you can quote this atheist.

11 posted on 10/28/2005 7:49:44 AM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg

The Red Cross is my charity of last resort. If there is absolutely no other way of giving to a cause I support than giving it to the Red Cross, I will give them a look. Otherwise, there are a lot of other outfits out there that can use my money.


12 posted on 10/28/2005 7:49:44 AM PDT by gridlock (Nature started the fight for survival, and now she wants to quit because she's losing... Monty Burns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg

I think people should help out through their local church. At least there is some accountability there. Well, hopefully.


13 posted on 10/28/2005 7:50:29 AM PDT by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg

Is there some reason why it's a red "cross?" Is there some terrible history in their background? Did they have their origin in something, er, Christian?


14 posted on 10/28/2005 7:55:33 AM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg
the Red Cross couldn't allow advertising any particular religious services because then it would have to allow advertising for all religious services.

And just what problems did they foresee arising if they did allow advertising for all religious services?

15 posted on 10/28/2005 7:57:50 AM PDT by DumpsterDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
The SA puts a much higher proportion of your donation into it's work. They are largely staffed by voluntêrs. The RC takes a big chunk off the top for HQ.

We had a large group of refugês at the fairground for a while with the RC in charge. They had said that they wanted only money, no goods at all. There was a number of mothers with infants that NEEDED formula. My wife took a car load of formula to the fairground and was indignantly refused permission to give it to the mommies. She and a preacher passed the boxes over the fence. I never heard whether the RC tried then to confiscate the contraband.

RC demanded there be NO goods donations because the organizaion can't get its cut from canned goods and clothes and the like.

16 posted on 10/28/2005 8:01:44 AM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
The Red Cross is my charity of last resort.

The Red Cross is no charity. They are in business to provide plush sinecures for bureaucrats and for empirebuilding.

17 posted on 10/28/2005 8:04:04 AM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

It's sad that group has so thouroghly lost their way as far as where they came from and what their purpose is. I keep hearing stories of them taking credit for stuff churches were doing. Micromanaging how people were recieving help, such that people were getting less help that they could and should have been because heaven forbid someone recieve unsanctioned help. Then there were stories of them inflicting gay rights stuff on their employees.

How did they get to that point? Bad leadership or involvement with our government along the way?


18 posted on 10/28/2005 8:15:33 AM PDT by ark_girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg
First off, thanks for volunteering your time to help those in need. I hope you don't think those who are criticizing the RC are attacking you.

I can see prohibiting actual services on site.

I may be way off base (the memory isn't what it used to be), but didn't the RC allow Scientologists to provide therapeutic back rubs at some sites? Wouldn't that be as religious to a Scientologist as a prayer service would be to a Christian?

19 posted on 10/28/2005 8:20:11 AM PDT by Stegall Tx (At least I can now fill up the bike for $7.50.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
"The use of the red cross on a white background, which is actually the Swiss flag reversed, was granted to the International Red Cross to commemorate the organisation founded by Henri Dunant, citizen of Geneva. Indeed, the plenipotentiaries of 35 nations, assembled in Geneva on July 6, 1906 to revise the "Geneva Convention," stated as follows in the enacting clause concerning the symbol of the International Red Cross: "To do homage to Switzerland, the heraldic arms of the Red Cross on a white field, which is formed by reversal of the Swiss Federal arms, shall be maintained as a distinctive emblem of the medical services of most armies."

Source

20 posted on 10/28/2005 8:20:41 AM PDT by F-117A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson