Skip to comments.Op Infinite Freep... Protest Anti-war morons in Madison on Nov 2
Posted on 10/28/2005 11:57:11 AM PDT by Thunder90
The left is planning another "Troops out-Walk out" on Nov 2, and they are complaining how Bush stole the election and other left wing blather.
The protest is sponsored by the Multiculteral Student center, Wunk Sheek, MeCha, Al-Awda, International Socialist Organization, MSA, World Can't Wait, Madison area Peace Coliation, Stop the War, Madison area Warming Center Campagin, and Student Labor Action Coliation.
The College Republicans are holding a rally in the University Square parking lot at noon. We probably will go to the bridge over University Avenue afterword, and await the path of the lefties. If they approach the Recuriting office, we will defend it.
The counter protest starts at NOON!
Final target info for Nov 2 in Madison is in this thread!
....this will probably be another "Antiwar" protest where their message is lost under the calls for gay rights, equal rights, women's rights, arguments against the WTO, arguments for the environment, arguments in favor of animal rights....
What were they protesting again?
More like protesting for Socialism and calling Bush a Nazi, Freeing Palestine, Freeing Mumia and the Cuban 5, and other stupid stuff like that...
If they approach the Recuriting office, we will defend it. Thank you.
Freedom must be fought for, protected, and handed on to our kids for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our kids and our kids kids what it was once like in the United States where men were free.
Thank you again.
They are having one on Nov 2nd in SF also.
You go, Thunder! I reported on what the Moonbats were planning earlier in the week. Glad to see that the counter-strike is in place. ((HUGS)) Keep the faith!
Think you'll get any TV coverage? If there's any breath of a chance, contact WKOW TV 27. They're amazingly centrist for a Madison TV Station. :)
You might want to e-mail or call Vicki McKenna @ WIBA, 1310AM because she'd most likely do a remote broadcast for ya along the route somewhere. Contact her soon, because next Wednesday is coming up fast!
Just some thoughts. You take it from here. *Salute*
in NYC as well... Times Square!
They're as insignificant now as they've always been. Just swat 'em! ;)
There are going to be students there, too. The same ones. We still need to counter them because if they are uncountered, they could brainwash other students (They get enough in class) and get them over to their side. I don't want that.
"I don't want that."
I don't either! Just know your enemy. They're clueless and stuck in the 60's...even if they're dragging their kids along for the ride this time around. It's the exact same playbook. They want Iraq to be another Viet Nam. They want President Bush to go down in flames ala President Nixon. That was their "moment in the sun," and they haven't had one since. They live in some sort of endless-loop cassette tape that's stuck in the dashboard of their Daddy's 1979 Chevy Cutless.
You're doing good! I wasn't being critical. Just don't worry about making a life-altering statement on November 2nd. Your life-altering statements can be made at the polls on 11-02-06 and 11-02-08; and bring all of your conservative friends with you!
These dopes are not worth it. It's probably not the hill you want to die on, though I do admire your conviction. :)
And I'm speaking as an Old Lady of 45 who has twenty years of military service and a few tear-gas laden demonstrations behind her. And for the record, I was always on the side of Justice! ((Hugs))
They are going to try to sit-in outside of a recruiter office and get themselves arrested, unless we block it.
"They are going to try to sit-in outside of a recruiter office and get themselves arrested, unless we block it."
Take the High Road. Let them get arrested. It's backfired on Cindy Sheehan. The media is dropping her like a Hot Potato and she's been arrested twice so far, trying to regain their love and attention. Very, very sad.
Just let the Socialists be themselves. They'll shoot themselves in the foot every d@mn time. ;)
First of all, the Quote was from Ronald Reagan and "Men" was a 'figure of speech,' sometimes termed a rhetorical figure or device, i.e. "Mankind." "Defend" as in 'nonviolent resistance,' i.e. "carrying signs."
"So was Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free." Quote was from Ronald Reagan.
Second, in Canada freedom of speech is not absolute as in the United States.
In the United States everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions without interference by anyone. The freedom of speech and of thoughts and of opinions is one of the most precious rights of man.
But how do you explain the attacks on the CPB from conservatives whom have said that they believe in freedom of speech, yet in contast to this, they openingly attack the CPB and PBS for producing "liberal" programs? Yet in Canada, there is more of a balance between conservative and liberal views? Furthermore, there is very very very very little cenorship of "profane" or to use the more American word . . . cussing on television? And if Freedom of Speech in America is more absolute, then why can't we run into a theater and yell fire? Why can't a business place a sign on their building without being charged some kind of tax or payment? Dosen't paying a tax interfere with one's freedom of speech? And how do you explain the FCC? So does that mean I can start cursing on this forum and nobody will mind? Or how about placing pictures of fully nude women on this site or any other site for that matter? I mean this is my freedom of expression.
And lastly, what about the sculptor who had his sculpture of an American flag and Osama Bin Ladin removed because "it was politically contriversial?"
Actually, no my questions are not verbal harassement. I just want some clarity to your following statement:
"In the United States everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions without interference by anyone. The freedom of speech and of thoughts and of opinions is one of the most precious rights of man."
I mean did I not post ideas that are relevant to "freedom of speech?" How I've interpretated your meaning of "freedom of speech" is that one can say what they want without being harrassed by government entities. Is my interpretation of your statement correct? If not could you please clarify and/or expound on your views? You can't hate a person for asking for clarity, now can you?