Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Ship In N. Korea (USS Pueblo) Get Her Back
The Washington Times ^ | 10/29/05 | Andrew Salmon

Posted on 10/29/2005 7:35:16 PM PDT by takbodan

PYONGYANG, North Korea -- In the center of the North Korean capital floats a commissioned vessel of the U.S. Navy. The USS Pueblo, a spy ship captured by the North in 1968, is moored on a bank of the Daedong River. Despite quiet U.S. moves in recent years to secure its return, the vessel still functions as tourist attraction, trophy and symbol of anti-American struggle.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: northkorea; usn; usspueblo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-122 next last
To: southland
In mid 50s you were using most likely, intelligence gathered by people that risked their lives.

The first time I saw an overhead photo of a major Russian city taken at high noon, I was awe struck as was everyone else. Someone had risked their lives for those photos.

81 posted on 10/29/2005 9:35:25 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Bobibutu
Read what you can about the 91st Recon SQ in Korean war. There is much good information and a book by a former AC from that outfit.

I forget his name but it is very enlightening for those that believe the Navy crew was heroic.

82 posted on 10/29/2005 9:38:26 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: southland
Each case is different. We had pilots shot down and captured during the Vietnam War. They were not stigmatized when they were released because they lost their aircraft. Some were promoted to flag rank and others received the MOH. The same holds true for other wars. Check out this article in the Naval Institute Proceedings: Confronting the Chinese
83 posted on 10/29/2005 9:40:15 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: cynicom

You are very correct. There was a question if we had enough fuel to get to our target. No fuel left to return so the plan was to bail out after vaporizing the target. We all risked our lives. Five percent of my flight class were killed in first 18 months out of flight school. One of my class is on the Viet Nam Wall.
And I know a pilot who flew with Gary Powers while he was in Strategic Air Command flying F-84's.
I did not stay in that long.


84 posted on 10/29/2005 9:40:55 PM PDT by southland (New Orleans was an incident waiting to happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Zeroisanumber
Not a Clinton fan, but it wasn't like Nixon, Ford, Reagan, Bush 41, or Bush 43 have done anything either.

Any reason for not mentioning Carter?

85 posted on 10/29/2005 9:41:31 PM PDT by FDNYRHEROES (Liberals are not optimistic; they are delusional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
In '69-71, I flew in the same air frame, PR 32, as the one that landed on Hainan. This was in a war zone..

PR 32 was thumped and then collided with a Chinese J8 (MIG 21 variant) suffering damage to the nose cone and destruction of the radars. The A/C commander regained control of the A/C, and the crew went to "pitch and ditch", destroying all sensitive equipment, jettisoning all to Davy Jones that they could.
The A/C commander brought PR 32 in to a safe landing on Hainan Island....not that he had much choice since he was under escort from other J8s. All in all, a commendable recovery on all parts.
All the Chinese got was a photo op and a battered airframe, which we got back.
We got back an entire aircrew.
86 posted on 10/29/2005 9:43:31 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (I once opposed keelhauling but recently have come to my senses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: kabar

I admit War Time is different. I was refering to incidents not in War Time.
The military does not give equal consideration to problems outside of hostel military action.


87 posted on 10/29/2005 9:44:54 PM PDT by southland (New Orleans was an incident waiting to happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: cynicom

"In mid 50s you were using most likely, intelligence gathered by people that risked their lives.

I was practicing " Duck and Cover" in grade school then - U-2's and then SR-71's later.

One of the 3G pilots is an aquantance.


88 posted on 10/29/2005 9:45:59 PM PDT by Bobibutu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: southland

In this particular incident, the pilot and crew of the US aircraft were not at fault. The Chinese fighter crashed into them while they were 50 miles off the coast. One of the Chinese fighters was lost in the collision. It took the heroic efforts of the US commander to land his plane safely. I would consider what the Chinese did to be a hostile action.


89 posted on 10/29/2005 9:51:40 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

Under Xlintoon's watch they could have sent it by way of the Air Force Adademy, West Point, the Naval Academy and Potomac and no would have been the wiser!!


90 posted on 10/29/2005 9:52:18 PM PDT by Young Werther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Many expected that since he did have control of the craft that he would have dived into the water rather than giving it to the Chinese.


91 posted on 10/29/2005 9:53:20 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Someone on FR posted a memorial page for the Dead pilot during the time immediately after the incident. I know no Chinese language but probed the page until an email page poped up. I sent message: the the pilots flight instructor should have told him not to fly near large aircraft.
Someone posted a reply to me that I was engaging in a dangerous activity . Perhaps NSA.
I got a couple of replys from a China source.


92 posted on 10/29/2005 10:02:14 PM PDT by southland (New Orleans was an incident waiting to happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Many expected that since he did have control of the craft that he would have dived into the water rather than giving it to the Chinese.

Yeah right. Given the description of conditions on the aircraft and the difficulty of maintaining control, the crew could not have egressed from the aircraft safely. The crew was not on a suicide mission.

The crew reported that they had succeeded in destroying secret equipment aboard the airplane before being marched off it.

93 posted on 10/29/2005 10:02:37 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: H. Paul Pressler IV

"A horrible symbol of America."

True, it is a horrible symbol, however, it's harmless to us now. All of the comms gear has been vastly outdated and its purpose, after all, was comms intercept. There is one particular piece of equipment on the ship that, no doubt, was a particular concern, a highly secure means of communications but I suspect that either the Korcoms didn't know how to operate it or the NSA made it irrelevant.


94 posted on 10/29/2005 10:03:02 PM PDT by Rembrandt (We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt
Chaof Anh,
About time you got back......at least some where I can find you.
Pick up the phone.
95 posted on 10/29/2005 10:12:47 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (I once opposed keelhauling but recently have come to my senses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt
NSA made it irrelevant.

Correct.

96 posted on 10/29/2005 10:14:03 PM PDT by ASA Vet (Those who know don't talk, those who talk don't know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: southland

"Someone posted a reply to me that I was engaging in a dangerous activity "

Keep it up and post - and keep a Rem 870 close at hand.


97 posted on 10/29/2005 10:19:31 PM PDT by Bobibutu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Husker24

Heh heh heh. That was good.

And it probably is the most modern ship in their navy.


98 posted on 10/29/2005 10:56:11 PM PDT by gogogodzilla (Raaargh! Raaargh! Crush, Stomp!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bobibutu

I was in Navy boot camp in San Diego when this happened.

My company commander, a chief petty officer was apoplectic with rage at Bucher for surrendering.

By chance we had a class about what you are permitted to do when you surrender. The instructor, another crusty old chief gave us the class by the book, and then told us, "This surrendering crap is for Army pukes!" "Bucher is a coward, and ought to be shot!"
"We are the US NAVY!" "You will NEVER surrender!!!" "You will WIN, or you will DIE!" "You will NEVER, EVER, HAUL DOWN THE FLAG, and you will kill anyone who tries to do so!!"

It made a massive impression on us.


99 posted on 10/29/2005 11:19:12 PM PDT by coladirienzi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: FDNYRHEROES
Any reason for not mentioning Carter?

Because he's a modern secular saint and can do no wrong.

/sarcasm

Seriously? I was just listing the Republican presidents since LBJ.

100 posted on 10/30/2005 1:06:49 AM PST by Zeroisanumber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson