Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Joe Wilson In A Bind
American Spectator ^ | 10-31-05 | Clinton W. Taylor

Posted on 10/30/2005 9:25:14 PM PST by smoothsailing

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 221-224 next last
To: SirLinksalot
I found something that should be quite useful when countering your leftist aquaintances.

It's a lengthy article but contains the ammo you need for making cogent arguments, although to be honest,for me, talking to lefties has been a waste of my time.

Tale of two papers>

161 posted on 10/31/2005 4:57:28 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Talon IV
BTW, in the Commission report it was also stated that the CIA, rather then taking Wilsons verbal report as evidence that there was no attempt to purchase yellow cake in fact stated that it actually bolstered the case they were.

I've heard this too but I can't imagine the reasoning. Can you post the pages where it appears?

162 posted on 10/31/2005 4:57:42 PM PST by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Talon IV
Let's say that I accept your preferred interpretation and that Plame did suggest Wilson for the trip. The report is clear - she neither came up with the idea that the trip was necessary or useful, nor decided who should go.

So why is her suggestion such a big deal?

163 posted on 10/31/2005 5:00:57 PM PST by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
Ah the art of creative insult is NOT dead..

Thank God. And I'm glad you appreciate it. I'm capable of recognizing it too...and of responding in kind. It's a joy to do so.

164 posted on 10/31/2005 5:02:58 PM PST by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: bvw

Scraping away the nonsense and snide remarks - you're right that Saddam's primary interest was in removing the sanctions so that he could reconstitute his WMD programs. That was - correctly - one of the principal justifications for attacking him.


165 posted on 10/31/2005 5:06:12 PM PST by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly
I find it particularly amusing that the CIA says it had no other options but to send Wilson. They really need to work on their Africa desk.

The CIA had reports from the Ambassador to Niger (the woman with the hyphenated name) and General Carlton Fulford, who they sent for the same reason they sent Wilson. They probably had reports from spies and covert contacts as well.

The Senate report is no great shakes for accuracy, consistancy, and clarity.

166 posted on 10/31/2005 5:09:04 PM PST by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers
Isn't it possible that Joe Wilson was in the uranium business himself, and had a vested interest in not finding that the Nigeriens had ever done business with Saddam Hussein?

I heard he had covert dealings in goat droppings.

167 posted on 10/31/2005 5:11:22 PM PST by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

Bookmark post.


168 posted on 10/31/2005 5:15:37 PM PST by LowOiL ("I am neither . I am a Christocrat" -Benjamin Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Yes, what's ludicrous about the whole affair is that IF there were any illicit dealings in Niger uranium, what were the chances that Joe Wilson's chats over mint tea would have revealed anything about them??? It was such an obvious bogus journey, at taxpayer expense - should have been deducted from Valerie Plame's CIA paycheck!!! And Joe Wilson has the nerve to pretend HE was doing the nation a great favor taking this junket at our expense any maybe building contacts for his bogus consulting business along the way....

Think about it: IF Niger had been taking any active secret steps toward dealing uranium to Iraq in violation of UN sanctions, would any current or former official just volunteer the info to Joe Wilson???? "Oh, yes, Mr. ex-Ambassador, we know about the UN sanctions but we decided not to pass up the chance for some foreign exchange revenue from Iraq..... please don't tell your CIA or the UN Security Council about this!"

That's what's been bogus about this matter from the start - the whole mission was preposterous and could not disprove anything at all. What's even worse is that, given that Wilson DID obtain an account of an Iraqi trade approach to Niger, which the former minister DID think was aimed at starting illicit trade in uranium, Wilson has been given a free pass from the MSM to totally lie about everything in this case. What a crock!


169 posted on 10/31/2005 5:39:02 PM PST by Enchante (Joe Wilson: "I don't know anything about uranium, but I did stay in a Holiday Inn last night!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing; PhilDragoo; potlatch; ntnychik; Grampa Dave; Czar; weegee; dixiechick2000; ...



 mp3   THE  SPY  WHO  LOVED  ME   midi 

170 posted on 10/31/2005 5:40:08 PM PST by devolve (<--- (-------(--do not check out my lame FR home page--)-------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

p.s. one might think it's a contradiction to assert that Wilson's mission could not have yielded any useful results when in fact he did get some info on a possible Iraqi attempt to start an illicit trade for uranium, but what I mean is that the CIA could not possibly DEPEND upon Wilson's trip doing anything to prove the negative.... i.e., if everyone he talked to swore up and down that there were no illicit sales of uranium or even attempts to discuss such sales, that would not give any REASONABLE person the slightest confidence that the trip had debunked anything. This was a totally slipshod and slovenly approach to intelligence gathering!


171 posted on 10/31/2005 5:42:48 PM PST by Enchante (Joe Wilson: "I don't know anything about uranium, but I did stay in a Holiday Inn last night!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: devolve; ntnychik; PhilDragoo; bitt; Boazo; Smartass; Lady Jag; abigail2
They travel with witches and 'carrier' bats!


172 posted on 10/31/2005 6:20:11 PM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry

"The Senate report is no great shakes for accuracy, consistancy, and clarity."

You make them sound like Joe Wilson. How is the Senate version less accurate then, say, yours?


173 posted on 10/31/2005 6:46:51 PM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry

You're splitting hairs.


174 posted on 10/31/2005 6:52:03 PM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry

It is a big deal because Wilson attributed his trip to the Vice President's office, and not his wife.


175 posted on 10/31/2005 6:55:38 PM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly
How is the Senate version less accurate then, say, yours?

Oh, it's far more accurate than mine...but still tough to read, incomplete, and sometimes incomprehensible.

176 posted on 10/31/2005 7:00:59 PM PST by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

Not at all. A position opened up, she suggested her husband - but she was neither responsible for selecting him or opening the position. Those responsible could have selected someone else, or no one at all.


177 posted on 10/31/2005 7:03:39 PM PST by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly
It is a big deal because Wilson attributed his trip to the Vice President's office, and not his wife.

The Senate report is very clear about this. The trip was initiated in response to a query by Cheney's office, not by his wife. He was selected to go on that trip by people other than his wife as well.

Inotherwords incompetent nepotism is not an accurate description of what happened.

178 posted on 10/31/2005 7:05:54 PM PST by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: devolve; smoothsailing; potlatch

179 posted on 10/31/2005 7:08:44 PM PST by Boazo (From the mind of BOAZO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Boazo

LOL, two teeth, crossed eyes....whoops, you forgot the wart!


180 posted on 10/31/2005 7:11:31 PM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 221-224 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson