The Federalist was written before the Constitution was ratified, before the 1st Congress met, before the BOR was written or ratified. It contains no discussion on the BOR, nor could it have.
I'm sorry, but that is incorrect!
I can't quote the number, but it is one of the last federalists papers. In it, Hamilton went to great lengths explaining the absurdity of a BOR - specifically using the freedom of the press as an example.
His reasoning was, essentially, why include a specific prohibition against something that the congress was not given the power to regulate in the first place.